6. CHARACTER EVIDENCE
prosecutor may offer rebuttal evidence on that same trait. The state may rebut only as to the victim's character, not the defendant's. Illustration. In an assault/self-defense case, the defense calls witnesses to testify that the victim ... testimony describing the subject's reputation in the community concerning a trait in issue.
Download 6. CHARACTER EVIDENCE
Information
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Documents from same domain
2.04 PREPARING A CASE THEORY
law.indiana.edu2.04 PREPARING A CASE THEORY Developing a theory of the case will be the single most important thing you do. This theory must be developed early, and will serve as your blueprint from which you will construct your case. As you prepare for trial, you will face a myriad of decisions, from which witnesses to call to which jury instructions to request.
Chapter 2 PREPARING FOR TRIAL - Indiana University …
law.indiana.edustructuring your trial as a whole and getting ready for trial: c Interviewing witnesses and fact gathering. c Preparing a case theory. c Developing and analyzing your evidence, and planning how you will fill in the gaps. c Forming a general trial strategy concerning such issues as the order of proof, the main points to emphasize, and selecting ...
10. CROSS-EXAMINATION AND IMPEACHMENT
law.indiana.eduA criminal defendant who testifies is treated no differently -- his bad character may not be proved by specific acts of dishonesty. 4. Prior Criminal Convictions Rule 609 provides that, with certain restrictions, a witness may be impeached witrh evidence of two kids of criminal convictions: (1) felonies, regardless of their nature; and (2)
DEPOSITIONS - Indiana University Maurer School of Law
law.indiana.eduinvolved in the pending acti on.! Potential witnesses -- the existence, identity, names, addresses and other information about potential ... incl uding criminal record, prior statements, biases and prejudices, and ... The deponent's trial preparation material (sometimes cal led work-product, sometimes privil eged), consisting
Chapter 9 CLOSING ARGUMENT
law.indiana.educlosing argument can solidify and organize your supporters, arm them with the strongest arguments in your arsenal, help them find your opponent’s weaknesses, and energize them to do battle in the jury room. This is the modern view of the role of closing argument: A lawsuit, like a chain, is only as strong as its weakest link. Contrary
Chapter 4 OPENING STATEMENT
law.indiana.edupresent it as a cohesive whole. While you cannot expect jurors to reach a decision in your favor based solely on your opening remarks, you can make effective use of the principle of primacy to begin this persuasion process. Too often, lawyers squander this opportunity to present their theory and highlight the pivotal evidence.
BASICS OF NEGOTIATION
law.indiana.eduotherwise deliberately deceive your opponent in order to gain a bargaining advantage, the ... false and misleading statements made to facilitate reaching a favorable agreement. Nevertheless, this is ... be based on material false assumptions, you may have acted unethically. For example, it is certainly ...
Chapter 7 CROSS-EXAMINATION 1 - Maurer School of Law ...
law.indiana.eduQ: You’re sure it was my client, Mr. Roberts? A: Oh, yes. Q: So, did you watch him for several seconds, then? A: Yes. He got out of his car and walked quickly over to where Mr. Hartzog’s body was. Q: Would you say it took four or five seconds for him to get there? One — two — three — four — five? A: Uh, yes, that’s about right.
Chapter 6 DIRECT EXAMINATION
law.indiana.eduDIRECT EXAMINATION § 6.01 INTRODUCTION The direct examination of witnesses is the most important part of the trial. Cross-examination may be more exciting and closing argument more eloquent, but it is the direct examination of your own witnesses that will determine whether the jurors hear, understand, and remember the facts upon which your
DEFENDANTS' REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS' RESPONSE TO …
law.indiana.eduPlaintiffs filed a response to Defendants' motion on October 2, 2000, and a response to Defendants' supplemental brief on October 9, 2000. In support of their response of October 2, 2000, Plaintiffs included numerous affidavits, thus essentiall y responding to Defendants' motion as though it had been filed pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 56 ...
Related documents
SAMPLE CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT AND SCHEDULING …
www.mied.uscourts.govExpert Disclosures (Rebuttal): Typically 30 days prior to fact discovery cutoff date Expert Discovery Cutoff: Typically 45 days after fact discovery cutoff ... testify at trial, except for rebuttal witnesses whose testimony could not be reasonably anticipated before trial, or except for good cause shown. ...
Practice Series - Jenner & Block
jenner.comFounded in 1914, Jenner & Block is a law firm of international reach with more than 500 lawyers. Our firm has been widely recognized for producing outstanding results in …
Judge Davila's Standing Order for Civil Cases
www.cand.uscourts.govexcerpts of deposition testimony or other discovery to be offered at trial, other than solely for impeachment or rebuttal. Any objections to the use of designated excerpts and any counter-designations or deposition testimony shall be filed and served no later than 10 days prior to the commencement of trial. 8.
American Mock Trial Association
www.collegemocktrial.orgJul 18, 2016 · In lieu of rebuttal witness availability, a defendant must first notify the court and opposing counsel in writing at the Captains’ Meeting of the intention to offer such evidence. If such ... it may be proved by testimony about the person’s reputation or by testimony in the form of an opinion. On cross-examination of the character witness ...
CR 56 SUMMARY JUDGMENT (a) For Claimant.
www.courts.wa.govserve any rebuttal documents not later than 5 calendar days prior to the hearing. If the date for filing either the response or rebuttal falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, then it shall be filed and served not later than the next day nearer the hearing which is neither a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday.
UNIFORM RULES OF LOUISIANA COURTS OF APPEAL
www.la2nd.organd page of any oral reasons for judgment. The transcript of testimony shall indicate the party in whose behalf each witness was called (whether on direct, on cross-examination, or in rebuttal), and by whom examined or cross-examined. In criminal cases, the record must also contain all or any portion of the following
Virginia Model Jury Instructions – Civil
www.vacourts.govRebuttal evidence may then be introduced if appropriate. Instructions of Law. At the conclusion of all evidence, I will instruct you on the law which is to be applied to this case. ... The evidence which you are to consider consists of testimony of witnesses, any exhibits admitted into evidence, and any facts agreed upon between the parties and ...