Current Directions in Psychological Jury Decision Making ...
Juror and Jury Decision Processes A jury trial typically involves contradictory accounts of past events and, often, uncertainty about future events as well (e.g., criminal defendants’ dangerousness, civil plaintiffs’ pain and suffering). Research on how jurors make sense of this dis-crepant information shows that they engage in an explanation-
Download Current Directions in Psychological Jury Decision Making ...
Information
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Documents from same domain
Criminal Trademark Enforcement and the Problem …
www.law.nyu.eduCriminal Trademark Enforcement and the Problem of ... 2 See Trademark Counterfeiting Act of 1984, 18 U.S.C ... case law that had expanded trademark law to …
NYU School of Law Outline: Criminal Procedure, Erin Murphy
www.law.nyu.edu{ The Court, however, says that the legislature should have used more than simply \shall" if it was suggesting a mandate. { Spouses tend to recant, there are limited police resources, and manda-
Hitler’s American Model The United States and the Making ...
www.law.nyu.edunewsletter of the Hitler Youth, described him as a “revolutionary” who might fail only because he lacked “a disciplined Party army like our Führer.”18 Meanwhile Roosevelt, for his part, though he was certainly troubled by the persecution of the German Jews and had harsh words for
Damages for Breach of Contract - NYU School of Law
www.law.nyu.edu2 I. Damages for Breach of Contract Three ―Damage Interests‖ •Expectation [Benefit of the Bargain]: Put promisee in position he would have been in had the contract been performed: •Measure: Wealth of promisee if promise had been performed – Actual Wealth
Damages for Breach of Contract - NYU School of Law
www.law.nyu.eduC. Implied Warranties 50 D. Express Warranties 51 XI. Writings as Evidence 52 A. Parol Evidence Rule 52 B. Statute of Frauds 55 XII. Constructive Terms: Material Breach 56 XIII. Mistake 57 A. Mutual Mistake 57 B. Unilateral Mistake 61 XIV.
Constitutional Law Spring 2013
www.law.nyu.eduCraig v. Boren (1976) (p. 1214) Sex Discrimination West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish(1937) (p. 511) Substantive Due Process United States v. Virginia (The VMI Case) (1996) (p. 1229) Sex Discrimination United States v. Carolene Products (1938) (p. 513) Substantive Due Process
Consideration - Home | NYU School of Law
www.law.nyu.eduWebb v. McGowan (S. Ct. AL, 1935): Working for D in a factory, P lept over a banister to divert a 75 pound package that was speeding toward D on the floor below. D promised to pay P. Consideration. 3. Harrington v. Taylor (S. t. N, 1945): P prevented Ds wife from murdering him by sticking her hand in front of a swinging ax. No consideration.
SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION - NYU School of Law
www.law.nyu.eduHowever, if interpretation of federal law is required to resolve the case, does not necessarily confer federal question jurisdiction. Gunn, 313. • Legal malpractice case requiring interpretation of patent law in case-within-case analysis. • Outcome of case has zero effect on patent law, and therefore no federal interest, no federal
CORPORATIONS OUTLINE I. EXAM CHECKLIST / BIG PICTURE …
www.law.nyu.eduVIII. FIDUCIARY DUTIES OF THE CORPORATE DIRECTORS - 33 A. The Fiduciary Duty of Care B. The Fiduciary Duty of Loyalty IX. MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS - 41 A. Three Ways to Get Control B. What can a merger accomplish? C. Statutory Mergers D. Triangular Mergers E. Law of Sale of all assets F. De Facto Merger Doctrine G. Shareholder Protections in ...
Civil Procedure Outline - New York University
www.law.nyu.edube regarded as rules of decision in civil actions in the courts of the United States, in cases where they apply. 1938: great procedural revolution (case XXX). The federal court applies their notion of the common law and their rules of procedure. Federal courts shall resolve the case in the way their think the highest court of the
Related documents
Model Criminal Jury Instructions
www.courts.michigan.govModel Criminal Jury Instructions Michigan Supreme Court We are pleased to provide an electronic copy of the criminal jury instructions presently in use for criminal trials. On January 1, 2014, by Administrative Order 2013-13, the Michigan Supreme Court created the Committee on Model Criminal Jury Instructions. The
Local Court Rules - Indiana
www.in.govcriminal rules lr49-cr2.2-100 random assignment of criminal cases lr49-cr2.3-101 case consolidation lr49-cr23-102 records lr49-cr00-103 grand jury lr49-cr00-104 special grand jury lr49-cr00-105 trial rules lr49-cr2.1-106 appearance and withdrawal of counsel lr49-cr00-107 discovery lr49-cr00-108 bail
Instructions for Reinstating a Pharmacy Technician ...
www.njconsumeraffairs.govInstructions for Reinstating a Pharmacy Technician Registration ... c. Completion of Certification and Authorization form for a Criminal History Background Check 2. Submit the completed application, all supporting documentation, and fees to the address below: ... non vult, nolo contendere, no contest, or a finding of guilt by a judge or jury ...
Racial 3 Discrimination in the Criminal Justice System
www.sagepub.comand objectivity of judicial instructions to a jury when an African American is on trial, and other discretionary acts within the system. Petit apartheid contrasts with grand apartheid. The latter encompasses overt racism. Studies on racism within the criminal justice system have been critiqued for giving undue emphasis to
Civil Dispositive Motions: A Basic Breakdown
www.sog.unc.edu* This diagram assumes a jury trial. In a non-jury trial, the court, as finder of fact, may grant a Rule 41(b) dismissal for defendant at close of plaintiff‟s evidence even where the plaintiff has presented evidence that would be sufficient to take to a jury. ** This is a rare occurrence, particularly in negligence cases.
Excerpt from PD-22, - Texas Department of Criminal Justice
www.tdcj.texas.govNov 01, 2021 · CRIMINAL JUSTICE . Excerpt from PD-22, ... event no written or verbal instructions have been issued regarding an employee ’s responsibilities or duties, the employee is expected to use sound judgment in arrivingat a prudent course of ... “Conviction” is: (a) a finding of guilt by judge or jury and the assessment of punishment, whether