How to handle authorship disputes:a guide for new …
Similarly, if your name is wrongly omitted, you should discuss this with the other contributors. You could contact the journal but an editor is unlikely to add your name without the agreement of the other authors.If your name is omitted by accident,and the other authors agree, then the journal may publish a correction. Key concepts in authorship
Download How to handle authorship disputes:a guide for new …
Information
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Documents from same domain
WWW.PUBLICATIONETHICS
publicationethics.orgCOPE Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors Good Editors should: (1) General duties and responsibilities • actively seek the views of authors, readers, reviewers and editorial board members about ways of improving their
CODE OF CONDUCT AND BEST PRACTICE …
publicationethics.orgCOPE COMMIT TEE ON PUBLICATION ETHICS CODE OF CONDUCT AND BEST PRACTICE GUIDELINES FOR JOURNAL EDITORS publicationethics.org Best practice for editors would include: ...
CODE OF CONDUCT AND BEST PRACTICE …
publicationethics.orgCODE OF CONDUCT AND BEST PRACTICE GUIDELINES FOR JOURNAL EDITORS 3. Relations with authors 3.1. Editors’ decisions to accept or reject a paper for publication should be based on the paper’s importance,
Responsible research publication: international …
publicationethics.orgThis document aims to establish international standards for authors of scholarly research publications and to describe responsible research reporting practice.
CODE OF CONDUCT AND BEST PRACTICE …
publicationethics.orgCODE OF CONDUCT AND BEST PRACTICE GUIDELINES FOR JOURNAL EDITORS Background/structure The COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors is designed to provide a set of minimum standards to which all
COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers
publicationethics.orgCOPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers COPE Council Peer reviewers play a role in ensuring the integrity of the scholarly record. The peer review
COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers
publicationethics.orgCOPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers • ensure their review is based on the merits of the work and not influenced, either positively or negatively, by any personal, financial, or other conflicting considerations or by intellectual biases.
COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers
publicationethics.orgCOPE C OMMI TTEE ON P U B LIC ATION ETH ICS Expectations during the peer-review process On being approached to review Peer reviewers should: • respond in a reasonable time-frame, especially if they cannot do the review, and without
Springer Nature PowerPoint presentation title goes here
publicationethics.org2 How to deal with plagiarism / 13 May 2016 Overview of this session • What plagiarism is and why it is damaging • The difference between plagiarism and text recycling
COPE in Montreal, Canada, May 2013 Council of Science ...
publicationethics.orgCouncil of Science Editors (CSE) More than 350 editors participated in this years’ annual meeting of CSE: “Communicate Science Effectively: The world depends On It!”. The keynote address on the opening day was by Jeffrey M Drazen, editor-in-chief of
Related documents
Integrated Report 2021
pdf.kabutan.jpOctober 2021 (Next issue: October 2022) Disclaimer This Integrated Report includes past and current facts about JAPEX and its affiliate firms, their plans and prospects as of the issuing date, as well as forecasts based on their business plans and corporate management policies. These forecasts represent management’s assumptions or deci-