Example: barber
NOT PRECEDENTIAL

NOT PRECEDENTIAL

Back to document page

District Court concluded that FRS had not violated the FDCPA, the District Court did not rule on the potential vicarious liability of the other defendants and we need not reach this issue. 2 Defendants do not contest the District Court’s finding that FRS is a “debt collector” covered by the FDCPA. See 15 U.S.C. § 1692a(6).

  District, Precedential, Not precedential

Download NOT PRECEDENTIAL


Information

Domain:

Source:

Link to this page:

Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:

Other abuse

Advertisement

Related search queries