SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES . Syllabus . FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION . v. TED CRUZ FOR SENATE . ET AL.
Download SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Information
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Documents from same domain
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
www.supremecourt.gov4 . v. HODGES OBERGEFELL Syllabus . Finally, this Court’s cases and the Nation’s traditions make clear that marriage is a keystone of the Nation’s social order.
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
www.supremecourt.gov2 OIL STATES ENERGY SERVICES, LLC v. GREENE’S ENERGY GROUP, LLC Syllabus . 1. Inter partes review does not violate Article III. Pp. 5–17. (a) Under this Court’s precedents, Congress has significant lati-
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
www.supremecourt.govment, as applied to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment. The freedoms asserted here are both the freedom of speech and the free exercise of religion.
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
www.supremecourt.govcite as: 583 u. s. ____ (2017) 1 breyer, j., dissenting supreme court of the united states nos. 16–9448 and 17–5083 quentin marcus truehill 16–9448 v. florida . on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
www.supremecourt.gov(Slip Opinion) Cite as: 585 U. S. ____ (2018) 1 Per Curiam NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the …
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
www.supremecourt.govment, as applied to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment. The freedoms asserted here are both the freedom of speech and the free exercise of religion.
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
www.supremecourt.gov2 CITIZENS UNITED v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMM’N Syllabus and cable television. Concerned about possible civil and criminal penalties for violating §441b, it sought declaratory and injunctive re-
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
www.supremecourt.gov2 . v. UNITED STATES CARPENTER Syllabus . prepared to recognize as reasonable,” official intrusion into that sphere generally qualifies as a search and requires a warrant sup
(ORDER LIST: 585 U.S.) MONDAY, JUNE 25, 2018 …
www.supremecourt.govThe judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the ; United States District Court for the Middle District of North : Carolina for further consideration in light of Gill v.
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
www.supremecourt.gov2 FLORIDA v.GEORGIA Syllabus . sets of principles guide the Court’s review. First, both Georgia and Florida possess “an equal right to make a reasonable use of the wa ...
Related documents
In the Supreme Court of the United States
electionlawblog.orgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania—which has a 5-2 Dem-ocratic majority—imposed a more partisan Democratic map backed by the Elias Law Group, overruling the rec-ommendation of its special master that had urged the adoption of the legislature’s plan. The question presented is: Do the Elections Clause and 2 U.S.C. § 2a(c) ...
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHEASTERN et al. v.
supreme.justia.comPENNSYLVANIA et al. v. CASEY, GOVERNOR OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the third circuit No. 91–744. Argued April 22, 1992—Decided June 29, 1992* At issue are five provisions of the Pennsylvania Abortion Control Act of 1982: §3205, which requires that a woman seeking an abortion give her
FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA …
www.courts.phila.govPhiladelphia Municipal Court Landlord Tenant Diversion Program Service of Writs of Possession - Completed Rental Assistance Applications ORDER AND NOW, this 24th day of November, 2021, in furtherance of the authority granted to the undersigned by the Supreme Court in continuing the Philadelphia Municipal Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
www.pacourts.usFeb 24, 2021 · Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 205.5. (Cover Sheet) provides, in part: Rule 205.5. Cover Sheet (a)(1) This rule shall apply to all actions governed by the rules of civil procedure except the following: (i) actions pursuant to the Protection from Abuse Act, Rules 1901 et seq. (ii) actions for support, Rules 1910.1 et seq.
PENNSYLVANIA ORPHANS’ COURT RULES CHAPTER I.
www.pacourts.usThese Rules shall be known as the Pennsylvania Orphans’ Court Rules, shall be referred to individually herein as “Rule,” and cited as “Pa. O.C. Rule _____.” Note: Rule 1.1 is substantively similar to former Rule 17. Rule 1.2. Construction and Application of Rules (a) The Rules adopted by the Supreme Court regulating the practice and
The Supreme Court of South Carolina
www.sccourts.orgThe Supreme Court of South Carolina POST OFFICE BOX 11330 PATRICIA A. HOWARD COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA 29211 ... 5888 – Covil Corp. v. Pennsylvania National Mut. Ins. Co. Pending 5891 – Dale Brooks v. Benore Logistics System, Inc. Pending 2020-UP-197 – Cheryl DiMarco v. Brian DiMarco (3) Pending
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
www.supremecourt.govOpinion of the Court . In 2012, while the Mississippi Supreme Court was con-sidering whether to review Jones’s case, this Court decided . Miller. v. Alabama, 567 U. S. 460. Miller . held that the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause of the Eighth Amend-ment prohibits . mandatory . life-without-parole sentences for murderers under 18, but the ...
Summary of Roe v. Wade - USCCB
www.usccb.org1973 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that women had a constitutional right to abortion, and that this right was based on an implied right to personal privacy emanating from the Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments. In Roe v. Wade the Court said that a fetus is not a person but "potential life," and thus does not have constitutional rights of its own.