WWW.PUBLICATIONETHICS
COPE Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors • adopt peer-review methods best suited for their journal and the research community it serves
Download WWW.PUBLICATIONETHICS
Information
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Documents from same domain
CODE OF CONDUCT AND BEST PRACTICE …
publicationethics.orgCOPE COMMIT TEE ON PUBLICATION ETHICS CODE OF CONDUCT AND BEST PRACTICE GUIDELINES FOR JOURNAL EDITORS publicationethics.org Best practice for editors would include: ...
CODE OF CONDUCT AND BEST PRACTICE …
publicationethics.orgCODE OF CONDUCT AND BEST PRACTICE GUIDELINES FOR JOURNAL EDITORS 3. Relations with authors 3.1. Editors’ decisions to accept or reject a paper for publication should be based on the paper’s importance,
Responsible research publication: international …
publicationethics.orgThis document aims to establish international standards for authors of scholarly research publications and to describe responsible research reporting practice.
CODE OF CONDUCT AND BEST PRACTICE …
publicationethics.orgCODE OF CONDUCT AND BEST PRACTICE GUIDELINES FOR JOURNAL EDITORS Background/structure The COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors is designed to provide a set of minimum standards to which all
COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers
publicationethics.orgCOPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers COPE Council Peer reviewers play a role in ensuring the integrity of the scholarly record. The peer review
COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers
publicationethics.orgCOPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers • ensure their review is based on the merits of the work and not influenced, either positively or negatively, by any personal, financial, or other conflicting considerations or by intellectual biases.
COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers
publicationethics.orgCOPE C OMMI TTEE ON P U B LIC ATION ETH ICS Expectations during the peer-review process On being approached to review Peer reviewers should: • respond in a reasonable time-frame, especially if they cannot do the review, and without
Springer Nature PowerPoint presentation title goes here
publicationethics.org2 How to deal with plagiarism / 13 May 2016 Overview of this session • What plagiarism is and why it is damaging • The difference between plagiarism and text recycling
COPE in Montreal, Canada, May 2013 Council of Science ...
publicationethics.orgCouncil of Science Editors (CSE) More than 350 editors participated in this years’ annual meeting of CSE: “Communicate Science Effectively: The world depends On It!”. The keynote address on the opening day was by Jeffrey M Drazen, editor-in-chief of
Responsible research publication: international standards ...
publicationethics.orgThis document aims to establish international standards for authors of scholarly research publications and to describe responsible research reporting practice.
Related documents
Guidelines for Scholarship - vtpi.org
vtpi.orgEvaluating Research Quality Victoria Transport Policy Institute 6 Guidelines For Living With Information (Harris 1997) These general guidelines are designed to help readers critically evaluate information,
A 360-DEGREE PEER EVALUATION OF LEADERSHIP …
www.dissertationdoctor.comA 360-DEGREE PEER EVALUATION OF LEADERSHIP COMPETENCIES By Anthony Rogers, MBA DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty of the Department of Center for Leadership Studies
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in …
www.enqa.euThis is the third edition of the “Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area”, drafted by ENQA in cooperation with EUA,
2016 ACC/AHA/HFSA Focused Update on New …
www.hfsa.orgGuidelines 2016 ACC/AHA/HFSAFocused Update on New Pharmacological Therapy for Heart Failure: An Update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of …
GUIDELINES FOR RESUSCITATION TRAINING - …
www.moh.gov.myGuidelines For Resuscitation Training In Ministry of Health Malaysia Hospitals and Healthcare Facilities First published in Malaysia in January 2012 by
FRANCE - OECD.org
www.oecd.orgFRANCE Development Assistance Committee (DAC) PEER REVIEW ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT