WWW.PUBLICATIONETHICS
COPE Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors • encourage reviewers to comment on ethical questions and possible research misconduct raised by submissions,
Download WWW.PUBLICATIONETHICS
Information
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:
Advertisement
Documents from same domain
CODE OF CONDUCT AND BEST PRACTICE …
publicationethics.orgCOPE COMMIT TEE ON PUBLICATION ETHICS CODE OF CONDUCT AND BEST PRACTICE GUIDELINES FOR JOURNAL EDITORS publicationethics.org Best practice for editors would include: ...
CODE OF CONDUCT AND BEST PRACTICE …
publicationethics.orgCODE OF CONDUCT AND BEST PRACTICE GUIDELINES FOR JOURNAL EDITORS 3. Relations with authors 3.1. Editors’ decisions to accept or reject a paper for publication should be based on the paper’s importance,
Journal, Guidelines, Code, Practices, Best, Conduct, Editor, Conduct and best practice, Conduct and best practice guidelines for journal editors
Responsible research publication: international …
publicationethics.orgThis document aims to establish international standards for authors of scholarly research publications and to describe responsible research reporting practice.
International, Standards, Authors, International standards for authors
CODE OF CONDUCT AND BEST PRACTICE …
publicationethics.orgCODE OF CONDUCT AND BEST PRACTICE GUIDELINES FOR JOURNAL EDITORS Background/structure The COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors is designed to provide a set of minimum standards to which all
Guidelines, Code, Practices, Best, Best practices, Conduct, Code of conduct, Best practice guidelines
COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers
publicationethics.orgCOPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers COPE Council Peer reviewers play a role in ensuring the integrity of the scholarly record. The peer review
Guidelines, Ethical, Peer, Reviewer, Ethical guidelines for peer reviewers
COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers
publicationethics.orgCOPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers • ensure their review is based on the merits of the work and not influenced, either positively or negatively, by any personal, financial, or other conflicting considerations or by intellectual biases.
Guidelines, Considerations, Ethical, Peer, Reviewer, Ethical guidelines for peer reviewers
COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers
publicationethics.orgCOPE C OMMI TTEE ON P U B LIC ATION ETH ICS Expectations during the peer-review process On being approached to review Peer reviewers should: • respond in a reasonable time-frame, especially if they cannot do the review, and without
Springer Nature PowerPoint presentation title goes here
publicationethics.org2 How to deal with plagiarism / 13 May 2016 Overview of this session • What plagiarism is and why it is damaging • The difference between plagiarism and text recycling
Title, Presentation, Goes, Here, Presentation title goes here
COPE in Montreal, Canada, May 2013 Council of Science ...
publicationethics.orgCouncil of Science Editors (CSE) More than 350 editors participated in this years’ annual meeting of CSE: “Communicate Science Effectively: The world depends On It!”. The keynote address on the opening day was by Jeffrey M Drazen, editor-in-chief of
Sciences, Council, Editor, Council of science editors, Council of science
Responsible research publication: international standards ...
publicationethics.orgThis document aims to establish international standards for authors of scholarly research publications and to describe responsible research reporting practice.
International, Standards, International standards, International standards for
Related documents
SUMMARY of selected 2015 LEGISLATION of interest to the …
www.courts.wa.gov2015 Legislative Summary We are pleased to present a Summary of Selected 2015 Legislation of Interest to the Courts that has been updated to include all three special sessions.
2015, Interest, Summary, Selected, Legislation, Summary of selected 2015 legislation of interest
DoD Directive 1030.01, April 13, 2004; Certified Current ...
www.esd.whs.milDoDD 1030.1, April 13, 2004 6 ENCLOSURE 1 legal guardian, parent, child, sibling, another family member, or another person designated by the court or the Component responsible official, or designee.
WEINGARTEN: THE RIGHT TO REPRESENTATION
www.nage.orgWEINGARTEN: THE RIGHT TO REPRESENTATION What are Weingarten rights? Employees do not have to be alone when they are questioned by an employer in a
Rights, Representation, Weingarten, The right to representation
BUPERSINST 1640 - United States Navy
www.public.navy.milBUPERSINST 1640.22 Article 1640-010 Page 4 of 6 29 Mar 2011 Enclosure (1) standards issued by the ACA shall be followed in determining corrections policies and administering shore brigs.
United states navy, United, States, Navy, Correction, Bupersinst 1640, Bupersinst, 1640
EMPLOYEE HANDBOOK - Renhill Group
www.renhillgroup.comPage 8 Anti-Harassment Policy Renhill is committed to maintaining a work environment that is free of all forms of discrimination and conduct that can be considered harassing, coercive, or disruptive, including sexual harassment.
One Hundred Fourteenth Congress of the United States of ...
www.gpo.govS.1177 One Hundred Fourteenth Congress of the United States of America AT THE FIRST SESSION Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,