Example: marketing

Calculation of Replacement Ratio - Coal Tech

1 Babich, A., Yaroshevskii, S., Formoso, A., Isidro, A., Ferreira, S., Cores, A., Garcia L.,(1996),Increase of pulverized coal use efficiency in blast furnace,ISIJ International, Vol. 36, , 1996. CoalTech Pty Lty2005 Calculation of Replacement RatioThe choice of coal for use as the injected fuel does impact significantly on the cost benefitthat can be obtained by pulverised coal injection. The primary factor that influences the costbenefit of PCI is the amount of coke that can be replaced by the injected coal.

4 Ishii, K., 2001, Advanced Pulverized Coal Injection Technology and Blast Furnace Operation, Pub. Pergamon, UK, 2001 5 Bennett, P., Fukushima, T., 2003, Impact of PCI Coal Quality on Blast Furnace

Tags:

  Replacement, Ratios, Replacement ratio

Information

Domain:

Source:

Link to this page:

Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:

Other abuse

Advertisement

Transcription of Calculation of Replacement Ratio - Coal Tech

1 1 Babich, A., Yaroshevskii, S., Formoso, A., Isidro, A., Ferreira, S., Cores, A., Garcia L.,(1996),Increase of pulverized coal use efficiency in blast furnace,ISIJ International, Vol. 36, , 1996. CoalTech Pty Lty2005 Calculation of Replacement RatioThe choice of coal for use as the injected fuel does impact significantly on the cost benefitthat can be obtained by pulverised coal injection. The primary factor that influences the costbenefit of PCI is the amount of coke that can be replaced by the injected coal.

2 Any coal canbe injected with the main requirements, from the viewpoint of chemical analysis being lowsulphur, ash content and minimum fluctuation in Figure A1 the data from several sources has been plotted against the dry ash free carboncontent which is a measure of the rank of a coal. In this figure all coal properties have beenrelated back to the carbon content of the coal assuming a fixed ash content and using in-house relationships between coal Replacement Ratio normally quoted in the literature is the metallurgical corrected coke75808590 Carbon (%daf) correlation (Brouwer & Toxopeus, 1991)*Other European correlation (1999)*Japanese correlation (Ishii, 2000)*Modelling 1 (Hutny and others, 1990)**Modelling 2 (Fukushima, 2000)

3 ** Actual blast furnace performance** Theoretical computer modelFigure A1 Variation of Replacement Ratio with coal rank2 Hutny, , Price, Gransden, , (1990),Evaluation of coals for blast furnaceinjection using a computer model,Ironmaking Conf. Proc., , , Toxopeus, , (1991),Massive coal injection at Hoogovens IJmuidenBFs, Revue de d'Informations Techniques, V88, N4, April 1991. CoalTech Pty Lty2005 RRSE coaldaf 0 63950 ()RRAshVM where the coke rate is corrected for furnace parameters, such as hot metal silicon content,blast temperature, etc.

4 , to give coke rates under standard conditions. The theoretical cokereplacement Ratio is between and kg coke/kg coal depending on the energy and carboncontent of the coal. Actual Replacement ratios achieved in blast furnace operations with lowto moderate injection rates tend to be slightly higher due to reduced heat losses and someincrease in reduction efficiency. At higher rates over 150 kg/tHM heat losses can increasewhich may lead to Replacement ratios that are lower than & others2(1990) have reported a general increase in Replacement Ratio with the C/Hratio of coal.

5 They derived a relationship between the calorific value of the injected coal andreplacement Ratio , this relationship is:whereRRfractional Replacement rateSESpecific Energy MJ/kg dry ash and Toxopeus3(1991) in summarising the PCI operating results at HoogovensIJmuiden blast furnace derived a relationship between Replacement Ratio and the propertiesof the coal injected. This relationship is based on the dry carbon, hydrogen and ashpercentage and is given below:whereCcarbon % dryHHydrogen % dryashash % above relationship reinforces the conclusion reached by Hutny & others that replacementratio increases with the rank of the coal.

6 Though the positive effect of ash on replacementratio is not what is 1996 a European steelworks reported the use of a correlation which uses the volatilematter (dry basis) and the dry ash content to determine Replacement Ratio and given below:whereVMvolatile matter % dryAshAsh % dry4 Ishii, K., 2001,Advanced Pulverized Coal Injection Technology and Blast FurnaceOperation, Pub. Pergamon, UK, 20015 Bennett, P., Fukushima, T., 2003,Impact of PCI Coal Quality on Blast FurnaceOperations, 12th International Conference on Coal Science, Cairns, Australia, November20036 Matsuzaki S.

7 , et al., CAMP-ISIJ (April, 2004) p. 137 Orimoto T.,et al., CAMP-ISIJ (Sept., 2004) p. 631 CoalTech Pty Lty2005In 1998 yet another European steelworks reported the following relationship for determiningthe Replacement Energy MJ/kg dryHHydrogen % dryCCarbon % dryMoistMoisture % air driedIshii4examining the data from Japanese steelworks showed that the Replacement Ratio wasrelated to the energy content of the injected T. Fukishma of F-TeCon Pty Ltd carried out the modelling5to investigate the impact ofPCI coal quality on the operation of a blast furnace.

8 It was found that the partial heat ofcombustion was a good parameter to estimate the Replacement Ratio . The partial heat ofcombustion is the heat released when coal is gasified to CO and H2less the heat ofdecomposition of the volatile recently Nippon Steel6 7has shown that Calorific Value in Lower zone of BF (CVL)can be used to indicate the Replacement Ratio that can be obtained with a coal. The CVL isthe partial combustion heat minus sensible heat of CO , H2and ash. CVL is defined as:CVL=Available heat of PCI coal in lower part of BF above 1400 C=Effective partial combustion heat above 1400 C=(partial combustion heat)- ( sensible heat of CO , H2and Ash)


Related search queries