炎上加担動機の実証分析 An Empirical ... - sgu.ac.jp

1 An Empirical Analysis of Flaming Participants Motives 1 Shinichi YAMAGUCHI 1 International University of Japan Abstract In this paper, I discuss flaming participants motives by Empirical analysis. Flaming is defined that slander comments rush to social media for the speech content and actions of a person. The results showed that many flaming participants (about 60%-70%) have participanted in flaming by a sense of justice. Participants who have enjoyed flaming are in the minority, about 20%. Furthermore, the justice type participants participate in a lot of flaming and write many times per 1flaming.

2 It was found that the number of participation in flaming increases by about when people think that flaming has a positive impact on society. In addition, the number of writing per 1 flaming increases by about when people think that flaming has a positive impact on society. , , , , 1 (2012) mixi Twitter (2015a)

3 2004 SNS 2009 2012 2005 2015 2000 4706 2005 8529 2006 Twitter 2011 400 2016 i 2013 2013 2016 ii Twitter 23%

4 (2007) (2009) (2011) (2007) (2010) (2012) (2012) (2013) 1 (2011) Sullivan & Flanagin(2003) Flaming Reining et al.

5 (1998) Flaming Inmen & Inmen(1996) Flaming Lange(2006) Flaming Moor & Verleur(2010) Lange(2006) Flaming Flaming Flaming Turnage(2007) E Flaming Flaming 2015a 2016 Adachi & Takeda (2016)

6 2015 Twitter iii 2015b 2 2 2014 Moor 2010 2012 2012 2010 2 2 3 4 2016 6 GLOCOM 40.

7 504 5 5 1, 2 1 4, 5 3 1= 2= 3= 4= 5= A. Twitter 145 B. 184 C. 143 D. CM 84 E. 191 5 1 1 60 70% 50% 10% 20% CM 20% 2010

8 1 3 5 Q. a) b) c) d) e) a), b) c) d), e) 3 (1) (2) (3)

9 I 1 1 0 i 1 i i i 1 (1) (2) iv (3) 1 3 40,504 2,017 1 277 478 40,504 2 2 d) e) 75% a), b) 20% a) 8% b) 13% 2 (1) (3)

10 3 3 a) b) d) e) c) 3 i 1 (1) v (2) (3) p vi vii * 1 p p p ** ** ** ** * ** ** ** **5%10% 20172772771%<1> <2> <3> 2 2 <1> 2015a 25% 1 1 40.