Surface Energy Data for PUR: Polyurethanes

1 Surface Energy data for PUR: PolyurethanesSource(a)Mst. Type(b) data (c)Comments(d)Busscher, 1983(158)Contact angle WY = 89o; no temp citedNo details on material , 1988(89)Contact angle WY = 72o; no temp citedNo details on material , 1988(89)Contact angle WY = 79o; no temp citedNo details on material , 1988(90)Contact angle WA = 82o, WR = 51o, d W = 31o; no temp cited100% PTMO Vialon , 1988(90)Contact angle WA = 79o, WR = 33o, d W = 46o; no temp cited67% PTMO/33% PEO Vialon , 1988(90)Contact angle WA = 71o, WR = 31o, d W = 40o; no temp cited33% PTMO/67% PEO Vialon , 1988(90)Contact angle WA = 55o, WR = 30o, d W = 25o; no temp cited100% PEO Vialon , 1988(90)Contact angle WA = 82-87o, WR = 50-51o, d W = 30-36o;Vialon 510X (4 formulations, from 45 to 75 Shore hardness).no temp citedTingey, 1988(90)Contact angle WA = 88o, WR = 50o, d W = 38o; no temp citedPellethane , 1988(90)Contact angle WA = 93o, WR = 45o, d W = 48o; no temp citedMitrathane , 1988(90)Contact angle WA = 90o, WR = 0o, d W = 90o; no temp citedBiomer , 1988(90)Contact angle WA = 105o, WR = 29o, d W = 76o;Lycra temp citedFukuzawa, 1994(113)Contact angle WY = ; no temp citedContact angle measured after stabilizing for 15 , 2009(227)Contact angle WY = 67o; 23oCCoating formed from commercial polyurethane dispersionfrom polyester-based , 2009(227)Contact angle WY = 73o; 23oCCoating formed from polyurethane dispersion from adipate-based , 2009(227)Contact angle WY = 73o; 23oCCoating formed from polyurethane dispersion fromcaprolactone-based , 2009(227)Contact angle WY = 85o; 23oCCoating formed from polyurethane dispersion from , 1975(296)Contact angle s = mJ/m2 ( sd = , sp = ); 20oCTest liquids not known.

2 Poly(hexamethylene diisocyanate-alt-triethylene glycol).Nyilas, 1975(296)Contact angle s = mJ/m2 ( sd = , sp = ); 20oCTest liquids not known. Poly(4-methyl-1,3-phenylenediisocyanate- alt-tripropylene glycol).Busscher, 1983(158)Contact angle s = 39 mJ/m2 ( sd = , sp = ); 20oCTest liquids not known. ESTANE , 1988(89)Contact angle s = mJ/m2 ( sd = , sp = );Test liquids: water and diiodomethane, by harmonic meanno temp citedequation; no details on material , 1988(89)Contact angle s = mJ/m2 ( sd = , sp = );Test liquids: water and diiodomethane; by harmonic meanno temp citedequation; no details on material , 1991(145)Contact angle s = mJ/m2 ( sd = ; sp = );Various test liquids, by geometric mean temp citedCommercial two part urethane , 1991(185)Contact angle s = mJ/m2; no temp citedVarious test liquids; thick film of polyether-based urethane castonto Ag , 1991(185)Contact angle s = mJ/m2 ( sd = , sp = );Various test liquids; thick film of polyether-based urethane castno temp citedonto Ag , 1994(113)Contact angle s = mJ/m2 ( sLW = , sAB = ,Test liquids: water, formamide, and diiodomethane; acid-base s+ = , s- = ); no temp citedanalysis, calculated per Good and Van Oss(86).

3 Contact anglesmeasured after stabilizing for 15 , 1994(113)Contact angle s = mJ/m2; no temp citedTest liquids: water, formamide, and , 2003(263)Contact angle s = 40 mJ/m2 ( sd = 31; sp = 9); no temp citedTest liquids not known. Bayflex 110-25 unfilled RIM PU;calculated by geometric mean equation. 2009 Diversified Enterprises