Joseph Smith’s Inspired Version of the Bible - Help for RLDS

1 9 Joseph smith s Inspired Version of the Bibleoseph smith began work on his New Translationof the Bible in 1830. But unlike his other scriptures, it was not published during his lifetime. It was first published by the RLDS church in 1867, although excerpts from it were published by the Mormon church in the Pearl of Great Price as early as 1851. Historical Background As you will recall from chapter 2, Joseph had submitted his Book of Mormon to the printer in March 1830, and formally organized his new church in April. In June he received a revelation purporting to be a dialogue between God and Moses which had once been a part of the Biblical record, but had since been removed.

2 In this dialogue God tells Moses that he will raise up another like unto you to restore many such passages to the Bible . This revelation concludes with the following: And now, Moses, my son, I will speak unto you concerning this earth upon which you stand; and you shall write the things which I shall speak. And in a day when the children of men shall esteem my words as naught and take many of them from the book which you shall write, behold I will raise up another like unto you and they shall be had again among the children of men, among even as many as shall believe. 1 This revelation was interpreted to mean that Joseph was going to be used to revise portions of the King James Bible .

3 Although Joseph soon began work on this new translation , it did not move along very quickly until Sidney Rigdon appeared on the 1 we told of a group of missionaries which were sent from Fayette, New York to western Missouri in the fall of 1830. On their way they stopped near Cleveland, Ohio with the hopes of winning Sidney Rigdon to their new faith. It worked. And almost immediately after his baptism he began working with Joseph on the new translation . While Sidney s only role was to be that of a scribe to Joseph , as Oliver Cowdery and others had been for the Book of Mormon, the actual degree of his involvement is uncertain. It is interesting to note, however, that Sidney had been involved with Alexander Campbell s own Restoration Movement over the previous nine years, and had been an official minister with them for the past two years.

4 And in 1827 Campbell himself had published an alternative English translation of the New Sidney was undoubtedly familiar with Campbell s Version of the Bible , we can only speculate about the degree of his input into Joseph smith s New 22 ,Dictionary of Christianity in America, pp. 214 215; 1005 1008; Way to Utah: the Forgotten MormonsHistory records that Joseph and Sidney worked together on the New Translationfor the next three-and-a-half years. During this time Joseph received a number of instructions regarding its translation and seen as a most significant process, perhaps second only to the Book of Mormon. And when completion of the work was imminent, Joseph even received instructions to build a special house in Kirtland, Ohio for the express purpose of printing the book.

5 And again, verily I say unto you, The second lot on the south shall be dedicated unto me, for the building of an house unto me, for the work of the printing of the translation of my Scriptures, and all things whatsoever I shall command you. 4 Finally, on July 2, 1833 Joseph and Sidney issued a joint statement that the work was complete. We this day finished the translating of the scriptures, for which we returned gratitude. 5 But despite all of this clear instruction, and despite many other publications his church would produce in the next eleven years, Joseph never published this new translation . Upon his murder in 1844, his widow, Emma, became the custodian of the manuscript. Once her son, Joseph smith III, became president of the RLDS church she relinquished the manuscript for publication, which was successfully completed in 1867.

6 But the reasons why Joseph himself never published the book remain a mystery and this has given rise to much speculation. Despite Joseph and Sidney s clear statements to the contrary, the Utah Mormon church has taken the position that Joseph never completed his revision. They point to the fact that he never published it, and to the book s internal contradictions as evidence that it was left unfinished. And since Joseph was told to not teach those scriptures until he had received them in full, 6they maintain that it is not appropriate to publish and use the entire book authoritatively, but only for historical RLDS church, on the other hand, relied on the statements of Joseph and Sidney, thereby concluding that the book actually was completed, and suitable for publishing.

7 And besides, being able to publish his New Translationof the Bible lent additional credibility to their claim of being the real successor to Joseph s original church. When first published in 1867, this book was titled aNew Translationof the Bible . Over time it came to be called the Inspired translation , and then later the Inspired Version , by which it is known today. Relationship to the King James Version Joseph smith used the King James Version as the base for his Inspired Version . As a result, the two versions are very much alike. The chances are that if you picked up an Inspired Versionand thumbed through it, and read some passages at random, you would most likely think you were reading a King James Version .

8 That is because most of Joseph s changes were fairly subtle. But there are a handful of places where Joseph inserted sizable additions to the Biblical text. Most of these larger additions were in the book of Genesis with one significant addition in Isaiah. 42:15; 45:11; 73:2a; 87:5a; 91:3a. Later instruction on printing came in April 1834, (D&C101:10c), and in 1841 (D&C 107:28b). ,D&C 91 6 42 R. McConkie, Inspired Version of the Bible , Mormon Doctrine, (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1966), pp. 383 9 Joseph smith s Inspired Version of the Bible105 Wewill look at the significance of some of these larger additions below. For those interested in a complete analysis of Joseph s revisions to the Bible , the RLDS church has published a columnar side-by-side comparison of the Inspired Versionwith the King James Version entitled JosephSmith s new translation of the Bible (Independence, MO: Herald Publishing House, 1970).

9 (It should be noted that the only portions included in this book are those which Joseph altered or expanded, it does not include the full text of either the Inspired Versionor the King James Version .) Selected passages of the Inspired Version have been presented in this comparative format and included in Appendix B and D for reference. Was it Really a new translation ? A number of new Bible translations have been produced since 1900, such as the New American Standard Version (NASB), Revised Standard Version (RSV) and New Revised Standard Version (NRSV) and the New International Version (NIV). These new versions have been produced by going back to the ancient Hebrew and Greek manuscripts and translating them afresh into contemporary English as opposed to the Elizabethan English of 1611 used in the King James Version .

10 Hence, each one is a legitimate translation of ancient Hebrew or Greek into today s English. Despite its claim of also being a new translation , Joseph smith s Version cannot rightfully be considered as such. The reason for this is that Joseph quite simply did not translate anything during its production. Virtually the only text he used was the King James Bible itself. Beyond that, the only other contribution came from spiritual impressions, his own vivid imagination or from Sidney Rigdon s theological speculations. In chapter 2 we saw that Joseph produced the Book of Mormon by use of a seer stone placed in a hat. First hand witnesses say that the stone would tell him things which he then dictated to scribes.