Example: tourism industry

各国の住民投票制度の比較(1/4) 資料3-3 (未定稿)

1 1990 2004 2/3 2/3 1/20 1/5 2

州法. 条例. 州憲法 州法 自治体憲章. 州法(多くは1990年代に 導入) 法律(住民投票法(2004年)) 投票実施の 要件

Information

Domain:

Source:

Link to this page:

Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:

Other abuse

Advertisement

Transcription of 各国の住民投票制度の比較(1/4) 資料3-3 (未定稿)

1 1 1990 2004 2/3 2/3 1/20 1/5 2 1/3 3

2 2003 2004 1972 2000 2003 2003 2004 1/5 1/10 3 1/5 1/5 123 100 132 133 1972 10 1/3 2000 5 2003 1/20 4 1972 2000 2003 1972 2003 2000 2007 5 (2006) (2003) (1998) Kaufmann, B.

3 , B chi, R., Braun, N., TheIRI guidebook to Direct Democracy 2010 edition (in Switzerland and beyond) (2003) (2006) John G. Matsusaka(2003), I&R in American Cities: Basic Patterns Tracy M. Gordon(2004), The Local Initiativein California New Jersey State Legislature Office of Legislative Services(2007) , Office of Legislative ServicesBackground Report Initiative and Referendum in New Jersey s Counties and Municipalities State of Oregon Elections Division(2010), City Elections Manual Municipal Research and Services Center(2006), Initiative and Referendum for Washington City and Charter Counties Guide State of Arizona Department of State(2009), Initiative, Referendum, & Recall Handbook (2003) (2003) 13 (1997 98) (1998) (2008) (2004)

4 (2009) (2003) 2007 (1998) (2004) Roland Erne, Direct Democracy in Italy Keith Parry(2010), Local Government: polls and referendums (2003)