Example: barber

ABILITY - Mencap

TIT U DE S TO. CHANGING AT ILI TY. D. LEARNING nceIS A B. ide A review of the ev Authors: Dr Katrina Scior University College London Dr Shirli Werner Paul Baerwald School of Social Work and Social Welfare, Hebrew University Proposed for publication by Mencap . of Jerusalem Copyright 2015 Scior & Werner. Changing Attitudes To Learning disability 2. Contents Contents Executive Summary 4. Introduction 5. What do we mean by attitudes? 6. Attitudes to learning disability 8. What has been done to tackle negative attitudes? 10. Limitations of research on attitude change 14. What can we learn from efforts to improve attitudes to learning disability reported to date? 16. Conclusions and recommendations for action 18. Recommendations 20. References 22. 3. Changing Attitudes To Learning disability Executive Summary Improving attitudes to people with learning health care providers), or those that have disabilities* is a key priority for Mencap .

review was written to help Mencap and other bodies to define this area by providing an overview of attempts to change attitudes to ... *In this report the term ‘learning disability’ is used as it is the most commonly used term in the UK to refer to what

Tags:

  Review, Disability

Information

Domain:

Source:

Link to this page:

Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:

Other abuse

Advertisement

Transcription of ABILITY - Mencap

1 TIT U DE S TO. CHANGING AT ILI TY. D. LEARNING nceIS A B. ide A review of the ev Authors: Dr Katrina Scior University College London Dr Shirli Werner Paul Baerwald School of Social Work and Social Welfare, Hebrew University Proposed for publication by Mencap . of Jerusalem Copyright 2015 Scior & Werner. Changing Attitudes To Learning disability 2. Contents Contents Executive Summary 4. Introduction 5. What do we mean by attitudes? 6. Attitudes to learning disability 8. What has been done to tackle negative attitudes? 10. Limitations of research on attitude change 14. What can we learn from efforts to improve attitudes to learning disability reported to date? 16. Conclusions and recommendations for action 18. Recommendations 20. References 22. 3. Changing Attitudes To Learning disability Executive Summary Improving attitudes to people with learning health care providers), or those that have disabilities* is a key priority for Mencap .

2 This a potential role in countering negative review was written to help Mencap and other attitudes and discrimination (the media, bodies to define this area by providing an the police, employers, legislators). Most overview of attempts to change attitudes to such interventions have been small-scale, individuals with learning disabilities, identifying used unrepresentative samples, and have gaps in the evidence and making suggestions not been rigorously evaluated, making it for a way forward. Our conclusions can be difficult to draw firm conclusions. summarised as follows: Evidence from the learning disability field and others suggests that contact with Increased community inclusion in countries people with learning disabilities has an such as the UK appears to have led to more important role in changing attitudes and positive attitudes to people with learning reducing prejudice.

3 At present we do not disabilities. Nonetheless, children and know what quality, quantity and type of adults with learning disabilities are still contact is most likely to change attitudes. frequently excluded from various fields of life, activities and opportunities, regularly It is likely that contact needs to occur have to face name-calling, bullying and alongside education about learning being stared at, and are frequently the disability , the range of abilities and needs targets of hostility. of individuals with learning disabilities, and their capabilities to counter misconceptions There is very limited representative**. and challenge negative stereotypes. general population data to draw on as baseline of attitudes that interventions can The effects of attitude change interventions be measured against.

4 On real life behavior are very under- researched. Confusion as to what learning disability '. constitutes, and about different terms In this report, we present a multi-level in use, appears widespread, as do model that may help in planning and misconceptions about the capabilities of integrating future work that can do justice people with learning disabilities. to address the complexity of changing attitudes to individuals with learning Attempts to change attitudes and counter disabilities. discrimination have targeted children and adults in the general population, as well as specific groups more likely to come into contact with people with learning disabilities (care staff, teachers, *In this report the term learning disability ' is used as it is the most commonly used term in the UK to refer to what in many other countries is referred to as intellectual disability ', significant impairments in cognitive and adaptive functioning of early outset.)

5 ** Representative data or samples are those where the characteristics of the sample (the people interviewed or surveyed). accurately reflect those of the entire population of interest. For example, a representative sample of the UK population would contain people with the same range of demographic characteristics as the whole UK population. 4. Introduction Introduction Policies, service provision and societal views of violence2. Not only are they often the easy people with learning disabilities have changed targets of verbal and physical harassment and substantially over the last hundred years. Up abuse, in some cases they are the victims of to the 1970s large numbers of children and horrific hate crimes seemingly for no reason adults with learning disabilities were confined other than appearing different and less able in institutions in the UK.

6 Now almost all children to defend themselves3 4. A recent review with learning disabilities live with their families, concluded that people with mental health and most attend inclusive schools*. Among problems and/or learning disabilities are the adults with learning disabilities many live in most likely section of the population to be their own homes with varying levels of support, affected by targeted violence and hostility5. and few remain in segregated educational, day More needs to be done to tackle negative care or residential provision. attitudes to individuals with learning Despite increased physical integration, disabilities, and to break down barriers that individuals with learning disabilities often still prevent people with learning disabilities from feel socially excluded and exposed to negative being accepted within society, and from perceptions and unwelcome behaviours.

7 Accessing a wide range of opportunities and Many are prevented from equal participation experiences taken for granted by people in education, employment, leisure and social without disabilities. These aims are enshrined pursuits. The fact that discrimination against in the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons people with learning disabilities is still an with Disabilities, which promotes a rights everyday reality is illustrated by estimates that based perspective instead of, for example, the only 7% of adults with learning disabilities charity discourse so long applied to people with are in any form of paid employment in the learning disabilities. UK1. Furthermore, nine out of ten children and adults with learning disabilities report that they have been the target of bullying, almost five in ten that they have experienced verbal abuse and one in four has experienced physical *The proportion of children educated in special schools stood at per cent in 2007 but had risen to per cent by 2013.

8 This rise has been attributed to a change in the political climate away from inclusive education6. 5. Changing Attitudes To Learning disability What do we mean by attitudes? Attitudes are a psychological construct of people9. Importantly, for stigmatisation to that refers to favourable or unfavourable occur, power must be exercised8, a condition evaluations of people, objects, places or that is clearly met in the case of people activities. They are made up of three aspects: a with learning disabilities. The term stigma cognitive component (how we think about X), offers a distinct advantage of being more an emotional component (how we feel about encompassing. In addition to a traditional, X), and a behavioural component (how we act narrower understanding of attitudes (as mainly towards X).)

9 While contemporary psychological concerned with what people think but not definitions encompass these three aspects, with what they actually do), the concept of in common parlance the term attitudes' stigma invites us to explicitly focus on behavior is mostly used to refer to the cognitive (discrimination), and on the process and power component alone, and less so to emotions and relations involved in negative stereotyping and actions or behaviours. A simple part of being discrimination. However, we recognise that, human is that we develop attitudes about to date, the term has rarely been used in the people, objects and activities we are exposed learning disabilities field. Hence, in this report to in life. Many of these involve quick responses we use the term attitudes when describing and are neutral or positive.

10 Accordingly, when work in the learning disabilities field. At times, we refer to attitudes that limit the rights and we intentionally make use of the term stigma opportunities afforded to people with learning to link to theory and evidence produced in disabilities, we should strictly refer to negative other fields and to encourage us to learn from attitudes' that we wish to tackle, or conversely other fields, where appropriate. positive attitudes' that we wish to increase or Returning to attitudes, recent research spread. distinguishes between explicit and implicit In other fields, such as mental health and attitudes. Explicit attitudes are evaluations HIV/AIDS, the term stigma' has been used in that are consciously available to the person preference to attitudes'. The term originates holding them and are generally measured in ancient Greek and was reintroduced into through questionnaires, whereby respondents common parlance in the 1960s by Goffman self-report what they think, feel or intend to who defined stigma as the process by which do.


Related search queries