Example: stock market

ABOUT WRITING

BAD IDEAS ABOUT WRITING Edited by Cheryl E. Ball & Drew M. LoeweBAD IDEAS ABOUT WRITINGOPEN ACCESS TEXTBOOKSOpen Access Textbooks is a project created through West Virginia University with the goal of produc-ing cost-effective and high quality products that engage authors, faculty, and students. This project is supported by the Digital Publishing Institute and West Virginia University Libraries. For more free books or to inquire ABOUT publishing your own open-access book, visit our Open Access Textbooks website at IDEAS ABOUT WRITINGE dited by Cheryl E. Ball and Drew M. LoeweWest Virginia University LibrariesDigital Publishing Institute Morgantown, WVThe Digital Publishing Institute believes in making work as openly accessible as possible. Therefore, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International License. This license means you can re-use portions or all of this book in any way, as long as you cite the original in your re-use.

Student Writing Must be Graded by the Teacher 273 Christopher R. Friend Machines can Evaluate Writing Well 278 Chris M. Anson and Les Perelman Plagiarism Detection Services are Money Well Spent 287 Stephanie Vie SAT Scores are Useful for Placing Students in Writing Courses 294 Kristen di Gennaro BAD IDEAS ABOUT WRITING AND DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY

Tags:

  Writing, Teacher

Information

Domain:

Source:

Link to this page:

Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:

Other abuse

Transcription of ABOUT WRITING

1 BAD IDEAS ABOUT WRITING Edited by Cheryl E. Ball & Drew M. LoeweBAD IDEAS ABOUT WRITINGOPEN ACCESS TEXTBOOKSOpen Access Textbooks is a project created through West Virginia University with the goal of produc-ing cost-effective and high quality products that engage authors, faculty, and students. This project is supported by the Digital Publishing Institute and West Virginia University Libraries. For more free books or to inquire ABOUT publishing your own open-access book, visit our Open Access Textbooks website at IDEAS ABOUT WRITINGE dited by Cheryl E. Ball and Drew M. LoeweWest Virginia University LibrariesDigital Publishing Institute Morgantown, WVThe Digital Publishing Institute believes in making work as openly accessible as possible. Therefore, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International License. This license means you can re-use portions or all of this book in any way, as long as you cite the original in your re-use.

2 You do not need to ask for permission to do so, although it is always kind to let the authors know of your re-use. To view a copy of this CC license, visit or send a letter to Creative Commons, PO Box 1866, Mountain View, CA 94042, book was set in Helvetica Neue and Iowan Old Style and was first published in 2017 in the United States of America by WVU Libraries. The original cover image, No Pressure Then, is in the public domain, thanks to Pete, a Flickr Pro user. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication DataforthcomingISBN-10: 0-9988820-0-3 ISBN-13: 978-0-9988820-0-0 TABLE OF CONTENTSI ntroduction 1 Cheryl E. Ball and Drew M. Loewe BAD IDEAS ABOUT WHAT GOOD WRITING ISRhetoric is Synonymous with Empty Speech 7 Patricia Roberts-MillerAmerica is Facing a Literacy Crisis 13 Jacob BabbFirst-Year Composition Prepares Students for Academic WRITING 18 Tyler BransonFirst-Year Composition Should be Skipped 24 Paul G.

3 CookYou Can Learn to Write in General 30 Elizabeth WardleWriting Knowledge Transfers Easily 34 Ellen C. CarilloReading and WRITING are not Connected 38 Ellen C. CarilloReading is Not Essential to WRITING Instruction 44 Julie Myatt BargerBAD IDEAS ABOUT WHO GOOD WRITERS AREW riters are Mythical, Magical, and Damaged 53 Teri Holbrook and Melanie HundleyYou Need My Credentials to be a Writer 60 Ronald Clark BrooksOnly Geniuses can be Writers 64 Dustin Edwards and Enrique PazSome People are Just Born Good Writers 71 Jill ParrottFailure is Not an Option 76 Allison D. CarrThere is One Correct Way of WRITING and Speaking 82 Anjali PattanayakAfrican American Language is not Good English 88 Jennifer M. CunninghamOfficial American English is Best 93 Steven AlvarezWriter s Block Just Happens to People 99 Geoffrey V. CarterStrong WRITING and Writers Don t Need Revision 104 Laura GiovanelliThe More WRITING Process, the Better 109 Jimmy ButtsBAD IDEAS ABOUT STYLE, USAGE, AND GRAMMARS trunk and White Set the Standard 117 Laura LisabethGood Writers Always Follow My Rules 121 Monique Dufour and Jennifer Ahern-DodsonWriters Must Develop a Strong, Original Voice 126 Patrick ThomasLeave Yourself Out of Your WRITING 131 Rodrigo Joseph Rodr guezResponse: Never Use I 134 Kimberly N.

4 ParkerThe Passive Voice Should be Avoided 139 Collin Gifford BrookeTeaching Grammar Improves WRITING 144 Patricia A. DunnGood Writers Must Know Grammatical Terminology 150 Hannah J. RuleGrammar Should be Taught Separately as Rules to Learn 155 Muriel HarrisBAD IDEAS ABOUT WRITING TECHNIQUESF ormal Outlines are Always Useful 163 Kristin MilliganStudents Should Learn ABOUT the Logical Fallacies 168 Daniel V. BommaritoLogos is Synonymous with Logic 174 Nancy FoxBAD IDEAS ABOUT GENRESE xcellent Academic WRITING Must be Serious 181 Michael TheuneCreative WRITING is a Unique Category 187 Cydney AlexisPopular Culture is Killing WRITING 194 Bronwyn T. WilliamsPopular Culture is Only Useful as a Text for Criticism 202 Mark D. PepperThe Five-Paragraph Essay is Rhetorically Sound 209 Quentin ViereggeThe Five-Paragraph Essay Transmits Knowledge 214 Susan Naomi Bernstein and Elizabeth LowryThe Five-Paragraph Theme Teaches Beyond the Test 220 Bruce Bowles, Starts with Answers 226 Alison C.

5 WitteResearch Starts with a Thesis Statement 231 Emily A. WierszewskiThe Traditional Research Paper is Best 236 Alexandria LockettCiting Sources is a Basic Skill Learned Early On 242 Susanmarie HarringtonPlagiarism Deserves to be Punished 247 Jennifer A. Mott-SmithBAD IDEAS ABOUT ASSESSING WRITINGG rading Has Always Made WRITING Better 255 Mitchell R. JamesRubrics Save Time and Make Grading Criteria Visible 259 Anne LeahyRubrics Oversimplify the WRITING Process 264 Crystal SandsWhen Responding to Student WRITING , More is Better 268 Muriel Harris Student WRITING Must be Graded by the teacher 273 Christopher R. FriendMachines can Evaluate WRITING Well 278 Chris M. Anson and Les PerelmanPlagiarism Detection Services are Money Well Spent 287 Stephanie VieSAT Scores are Useful for Placing Students in WRITING Courses 294 Kristen di GennaroBAD IDEAS ABOUT WRITING AND DIGITAL TECHNOLOGYT exting Ruins Students Grammar Skills 301 Scott WarnockTexting Ruins Literacy Skills 308 Christopher JusticeGamification Makes WRITING Fun 315 Joshua Daniel-WariyaThe More Digital Technology, the Better 320 Genesea M.

6 Carter and Aurora MatzkeDigital Natives and Digital Immigrants 325 Phill Michael AlexanderBAD IDEAS ABOUT WRITING TEACHERSYou re Going to Need This for College 333 Andrew HollingerDual-Enrollment WRITING Classes Should Always be Pursued 338 Caroline WilkinsonSecondary-School English Teachers Should Only be Taught Literature 344 Elizabethada A. WrightFace-to-Face Courses are Superior to Online Courses 351 Tiffany Bourelle and Andy BourelleAnyone Can Teach an Online WRITING Course 356 Beth L. HewettAnyone Can Teach WRITING 363 Seth KahnBAD IDEAS ABOUT WRITINGINTRODUCTIONC heryl E. Ball and Drew M. Loewe Beginning in 1998, has asked a diverse group of schol-ars, intellectuals, and artists the annual Edge Question, a ques-tion designed to spark arguments ABOUT provocative ideas to be published online and collected into print volumes intended for a general public audience.

7 Edge Questions have included such ques-tions as What is your dangerous idea?, What have you changed your mind ABOUT ? Why?, and the one that inspired this collec-tion: What scientific idea is ready for retirement? That last ques-tion was the 2014 Edge Question, published in a book titled This Idea Must Die: Scientific Theories that are Blocking Progress. Drew first saw the book in a publisher s exhibit at the 2015 Conference on College Composition and Communication, a big annual conven-tion of WRITING teachers and scholars. After reading the book, espe-cially in the context of an academic convention, Drew suggested on social media that the field of WRITING studies should publish its own collective effort to name particularly unhelpful or backward ideas and argue directly to the public ABOUT them. Cheryl replied right away that she would be on board, and thus this project was project is necessary because while scholars in WRITING stud-ies (just as in any academic field) argue to and against one another in scholarly journals, books, and conference talks, those forms of knowledge-making don t consistently find their way into the public s understanding of WRITING .

8 Yet the public in all its mani-festations teachers, students, parents, administrators, lawmak-ers, news media are important to how WRITING is conceptualized and taught. These publics deserve clearly articulated and well-re-searched arguments ABOUT what is not working, what must die, and what is blocking progress in current understandings of WRITING . So our call for proposals sought contributions that provided a snapshot 2 Bad Ideas ABOUT Writingof major myths ABOUT WRITING instruction written by experts for the educated public that could collectively spark debate and have us rethink our pieties and myths. This collection is an attempt by a varied and diverse group of WRITING scholar teachers to trans-late our specialized knowledge and experiences ABOUT WRITING for a truly wide set of audiences, most of whom will never read the scholarly journals and books or attend conferences ABOUT this topic because of the closed nature of such publications and proceed-ings.

9 In keeping with the public purpose of these writings, it was important to us that it be published open-access. Because there are so few options for trade-like academic books that are open access, we decided in consultation with the authors of this collection to publish Bad Ideas ABOUT WRITING as an open educational resource through the Digital Publishing Institute, which Cheryl directs. Bad Ideas will join other books in West Virginia University Library s nascent digital publishing project, where it will be supported by librarians for a long time to come. We intend this work to be less a bestiary of bad ideas ABOUT WRITING than an effort to name bad ideas and suggest better ones. Some of those bad ideas are quite old, such as the archetype of the inspired genius author, the five-paragraph essay, or the abuse of adjunct WRITING teachers. Others are much newer, such as computerized essay scoring or gamification.

10 Some ideas, such as the supposed demise of literacy brought on by texting, are newer bad ideas but are really instances of older bad ideas ABOUT literacy always being in a cycle of decline. Yet the same core questions such as what is good WRITING , what makes a good writer, how should WRITING be assessed, and the like persist across contexts, technologies, and eras. The project has its genesis in frustration, but what emerges is hope: hope for leaving aside bad ideas and thinking ABOUT WRITING in more productive, inclusive, and useful ways. The individual entries, which we came to dub as both opin-ionated encyclopedia entries and researched mini-manifestos, offer syntheses of relevant research and experience along with cross-ref-erences to other entries that take up related subjects. Instead of the typical trappings of academic citation styles (APA, MLA, Chicago, Oxford, etc.) that are specific to certain disciplines, we asked authors in the Bad Ideas collection to summarize the avail-able research and present it in a way similar to how a newspaper, introductory textbook, or podcast might deliver such research not through individual citations, but through a list of resources and further reading that would point readers to follow-up material.