ADVERTISING INJURY COVERAGE - Larson

1 ADVERTISING INJURY COVERAGE Richard Bale, Esq. Patrick J. Boley, Larson King, LLP St. Paul, Minnesota I. Introduction Liability insurance COVERAGE for ADVERTISING injuries is generally designed to cover third-party claims based on the actions or communications of the policyholder in ADVERTISING or promoting goods and services. This type of COVERAGE will provide for defense costs and indemnification of the policyholder, and is generally found in COVERAGE Part B of a Comprehensive General Liability (CGL) policy.

2 Many CGL policies follow the standard forms that are issued by the Insurance Service Office (ISO), and the ADVERTISING INJURY provisions of these ISO forms will be discussed herein. Despite the prevalence of these ISO forms, however, practitioners must carefully review the policy language at issue because many insurers modify the ISO language, particularly for specialized coverages. II. ADVERTISING INJURY COVERAGE In ISO Forms Through the Years A. The 1973 Broad Form Endorsement.

3 COVERAGE for ADVERTISING activities was first made available in ISO CGL policies in 1973 as part of the Broad Form Comprehensive General Liability Endorsement, an optional expansion of COVERAGE available to some policyholders. The ADVERTISING INJURY COVERAGE available in the 1973 Endorsement afforded COVERAGE for all sums which the insured shall 1 The authors wish to acknowledge the contributions of Margie Jennings for her assistance in the research and writing of this paper.

4 Ms. Jennings is in her third year at Drake University School of Law and will join Larson King as an associate in 2007. 2become legally obligated to pay as damages because of .. ADVERTISING INJURY to which [the] insurance applies. In the 1973 Endorsement, ADVERTISING INJURY was defined as: INJURY arising out of an offense committed during the policy period occurring in the course of the named insured s ADVERTISING activities, if such INJURY arises out of libel, slander, defamation, violation of right of privacy, piracy, unfair competition or infringement of copyright, title or slogan.

5 The 1973 Endorsement did not define what would be considered ADVERTISING activities. The 1973 Endorsement typically included an exclusion of COVERAGE for claims for ADVERTISING INJURY arising out of .. infringement of trademark, service mark or trade name, other than titles or slogans, by use thereof on or in connection with goods, products or services sold, offered for sale, or advertised. The 1973 Endorsement began the evolution of ADVERTISING INJURY COVERAGE , which has since undergone numerous changes.

6 In 1986, ADVERTISING INJURY COVERAGE was revised and incorporated into the main ISO CGL policy form. Subsequently, there were two major changes to the ADVERTISING INJURY provision in the ISO CGL policy form, one in 1998 and another in 2001. ISO revisions also have attempted to address the increasing use of and liabilities arising out of electronic communications such as faxes, emails and the internet. It is important to keep these changes in mind when considering questions of COVERAGE under the ADVERTISING INJURY provisions.

7 B. The 1986 ISO Form: CG 00 01 11 85 In 1986, ISO revised the ADVERTISING INJURY COVERAGE provision and moved it from the Broad Form Endorsement to Part B of the main policy form. To date, ADVERTISING INJURY COVERAGE remains in the Part B section of the CGL main policy form. Like the 1973 Endorsement, the 1986 form did not define ADVERTISING activities; however, the enumerated offenses for which ADVERTISING INJURY COVERAGE would apply were 3revised. ADVERTISING INJURY was now intended to cover INJURY arising out of one or more of the following offenses: a.

8 Oral or written publication of material that slanders or libels a person or organization or disparages a person s or organization s goods, products or services; b. Oral or written publication of material that violates a person s right of privacy; c. Misappropriation of ADVERTISING ideas or style of doing business; or d. Infringement of copyright, title or slogan This description of ADVERTISING INJURY differed from the 1973 Endorsement in that it eliminated the enumerated offenses of defamation, piracy, and unfair competition.

9 The 1986 form added the offenses of misappropriation of ADVERTISING ideas or style of doing business and COVERAGE for the disparagement of goods, products or services. Another significant difference between the 1973 Endorsement and the 1986 form was the elimination of the exclusion for claims for infringement of trademark, service mark, or trade name, other than titles or slogans[.] C. The 1998 ISO Form: CG 00 01 07 98 ADVERTISING INJURY COVERAGE in the ISO form underwent major changes in 1998. The 1998 form combined the formerly separate ADVERTISING INJURY COVERAGE provisions with the personal INJURY COVERAGE provisions into a Personal and ADVERTISING INJURY COVERAGE section as Part B.

10 In addition, the 1998 form made several substantive changes to the enumerated offenses for ADVERTISING INJURY COVERAGE . The 1998 form eliminated the term misappropriation, replaced the term title with trade dress, and added the phrase in your advertisement to the enumerated offenses in (c) and (d). The offense of misappropriation of ADVERTISING ideas or style of doing business was changed to use of another s ADVERTISING idea in your advertisement. Also, the offense of 4 infringement of copyright, title or slogan was changed to Infringing upon another s copyright, trade dress or slogan in your advertisement.