An Introduction to Marxist

1 An Introduction to Marxist ECONOMIC THEORYE rnest Mandel2 An In t r o d u c tI o n t o MA r xI s t Ec o n oM Ic th E o r yco n tE n t sIn t r o d u c tI o n by Doug Lorimer ..3 I. th E th E o r y o f VA l uE A n d su r p l u s VA l uE ..5 Social surplus product ..5 Commodities, use value and exchange value ..7 The Marxist theory of alienation ..9 The law of value ..10 Determination of the exchange value of commodities ..13 What is socially necessary labour ? ..16 The origin and nature of surplus value ..18 The validity of the labour theory of value ..20 II. cA p I t A l A n d cA p I t A l I s M ..23 Capital in precapitalist society ..23 Origins of the capitalist mode of production ..24 Origins and definition of the modern proletariat ..27 The fundamental mechanism of capitalist economy.

2 30 The growth in the organic composition of capital ..33 Competition leads to concentration and monopoly ..36 Tendency of the average rate of profit to decline ..37 The fundamental contradiction in the capitalist system and the periodic crises of overproduction ..41 III. nE o-cA p I t A l I s M ..43 The origins of neo-capitalism ..43A permanent technological revolution ..45 The importance of armament expenditures ..48 How crises are amortised in a tendency to permanent inflation ..54 Economic planning ..55 The state guarantee of profit ..58 Copyright Resistance Books 2002 ISBN: 1876646306 Published by: Resistance Books, 23 Abercrombie St, Chippendale NSW 2008, AustraliaPrinted by: El Faro Printing, 79 King St, Newtown NSW 2042, AustraliaIn t r o d u c tI o nBy Doug LorimerErnest Mandel (1923-95) was the most influential exponent of Marxist economic theory in the Western world during the second half of the 20th century, and is best known for his masterful two-volume work Marxist Economic Theory (1962) and his brilliant Late Capitalism (1972).

3 In the former, he demonstrated that it was possible, on the basis of the contemporary data, to reconstitute the whole economic system of Karl Marx 100 years after the first publication of Marx s Capital. In the latter work, Mandel provided an explanation of the causes of the 20-year wave of rapid growth of the world capitalist economy after World War II, which also demonstrated that it would soon be followed by an indeterminately long wave of much slower economic growth, and recurrent social and political crises in the developed capitalist Capitalism also provided the first comprehensive analysis of the new features of global capitalism that emerged in the post-war period and that are still with us today transnational corporations as the dominant form of capitalist business organisation, the enormous growth of the services sector, the crucial role of state expenditure in propping up an economic system marked by financial instability.

4 Long-term stagnation punctuated by speculative booms, mindless consumerism and accelerating environmental pamphlet, which was first published in French in 1964, provides a concise exposition of the elementary princples of Marxist economic theory. In the first section, Mandel elucidates the basic categories of Marx s economic doctrine from the emergence of the social surplus product to the labour theory of value. In the second section, he explains the basic laws of motion of capitalism and its inherent contradictions. In the final second, he applies these to some of the new features exhibited by the new stage of imperialist capitalism that emerged after the second world war, which at the time he termed neo-capitalism .In his more mature work Late Capitalism, Mandel abandoned this term in favour of the designation late capitalism , explaining in the Introduction to 4 An In t r o d u c tI o n t o MA r xI s t Ec o n oM Ic th E o r ythat work that the designation neo-capitalism could be falsely interpreted to imply either a radical continuity or discontinuity with traditional capitalism.

5 Instead, Mandel stressed that the era of late capitalism is not a new epoch of capitalist development [but] merely a further development of the imperialist, monopoly-capitalist epoch with the characteristics of the imperialist epoch enumerated by Lenin at the beginning of the 20th century remaining fully valid for late capitalism . First presented at an educational weekend organised by the Paris Federation of the United Socialist Party in 1963 and subsequently published in Les Cahiers du Centre d tudes Socialistes, February th E th E o r y o f VA l uE A n d su r p l u s VA l uEIn the last analysis, every step forward in the history of civilisation has been brought about by an increase in the productivity of labour . As long as a given group of men barely produced enough to keep itself alive, as long as there was no surplus over and above this necessary product, it was impossible for a division of labour to take place and for artisans, artists or scholars to make their appearance.

6 Under these conditions, the technical prerequisites for such specialisation could not possibly be cI Al s u r p l u s p r o d u c tAs long as the productivity of labour remains at a level where one man can only produce enough for his own subsistence, social division does not take place and any social differentiation within society is impossible. Under these conditions, all men are producers and they are all on the same economic increase in the productivity of labour beyond this low point makes a small surplus possible, and once there is a surplus of products, once man s two hands can produce more than is needed for his own subsistence, then the conditions have been set for a struggle over how this surplus will be this point on, the total output of a social group no longer consists solely of labour necessary for the subsistence of the producers.

7 Some of this labour output may now be used to release a section of society from having to work for its own this situation arises, a section of society can become a ruling class, whose outstanding characteristic is its emancipation from the need of 6 An In t r o d u c tI o n t o MA r xI s t Ec o n oM Ic th E o r yworking for its own , the labour of the producers can be divided into two parts. A part of this labour continues to be used for the subsistence of the producers themselves and we call this part necessary labour ; the other part is used to maintain the ruling class and we give it the name surplus us illustrate this by the very clear example of plantation slavery, as it existed in certain regions and periods of the Roman Empire, or as we find it in the West Indies and the islands of Portuguese Africa starting with the 17th century, on the great plantations which were established there.

8 In these tropical areas, even the slave s food was generally not provided by the master; the slave had to produce this himself by working a tiny plot of ground on Sundays and the products from this labour constituted his store of food. On six days of the week the slave worked on the plantation and received in return none of the products of his labour . This is the labour which creates a social surplus product, surrendered by the slave as soon as it is produced and belonging solely to the work week, which in this case is seven days, can be divided into two parts: the work of one day, Sunday, constitutes necessary labour , that labour which provides the products for the subsistence of the slave and his family; the work of the other six days is surplus labour and all of its products go to the master, are used for his sustenance and his enrichment as great domains of the early Middle Ages furnish us with another illustration.

9 The land of these domains was divided into three parts: the communal lands consisting of forest, meadows, swamps, etc.; the land worked by the serf for his own and his family s subsistence; and finally, the land worked by the serf in order to maintain the feudal lord. The work week during this period was usually six days, not seven. It was divided into two equal parts: the serf worked three days on the land from which the yield belonged to him; the other three days he worked on the feudal lord s land, without remuneration, supplying free labour to the ruling products of each of these two very different types of labour can be defined in different terms. When the producer is performing necessary labour , he is producing a necessary product.

10 When he is performing surplus labour , he is producing a social surplus , social surplus product is that part of social production which is produced by the labouring class but appropriated by the ruling class, regardless of the form the social surplus product may assume, whether this be one of natural products, or commodities to be sold, or value is simply the monetary form of the social surplus product. When the ruling class appropriates the part of society s production previously defined as surplus product exclusively in the monetary form, then we use the term surplus value instead of surplus product .As we shall see later on, however, the above only constitutes a preliminary approach to the definition of surplus does social surplus product come into existence?