Example: confidence

Answers - ACCA Global

Answers13 Professional Level Essentials Module, Paper P2 (INT)Corporate Reporting (International) September/December 2017 Sample Answers1 (a) Consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income for the Moorland Group for the year ended 30 June 2017 Total $m Revenue 887 Cost of sales (531) Gross profit 356 Administrative costs (142) Other expenses (85 9) Operating profit 128 1 Net finance costs (23 8) Profit before tax 104 3 Income tax expense (50 2) Profit for the year 54 1 Other comprehensive income Items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss Gains on property revaluation 61 8 Pension remeasurement loss (4 2)

17 Since Tybull is the only overseas subsidiary, it is likely that separate disclosure is necessary so that users can better assess the performance of Tybull and …

Tags:

  Answers, Overseas

Information

Domain:

Source:

Link to this page:

Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:

Other abuse

Advertisement

Transcription of Answers - ACCA Global

1 Answers13 Professional Level Essentials Module, Paper P2 (INT)Corporate Reporting (International) September/December 2017 Sample Answers1 (a) Consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income for the Moorland Group for the year ended 30 June 2017 Total $m Revenue 887 Cost of sales (531) Gross profit 356 Administrative costs (142) Other expenses (85 9) Operating profit 128 1 Net finance costs (23 8) Profit before tax 104 3 Income tax expense (50 2) Profit for the year 54 1 Other comprehensive income Items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss Gains on property revaluation 61 8 Pension remeasurement loss (4 2) 57 6 Items that may be reclassified to profit or loss Exchange losses (85 9) Other comprehensive income (28 3) Total comprehensive income for year 25 8 Non-controlling interest profits (W9)

2 13 4 Shareholders of Moorland profits (balance) 40 7 Profit for the year 54 1 Non-controlling interest total comprehensive income (W9) 20 2 Shareholders of Moorland total comprehensive interest (W10) 5 6 Total comprehensive income for the year 25 8 14 Working 1: Consolidation schedule Moorland Lyndhurst Tybull Adjust Consol (W5) (W5) $m $m $m Revenue 580 202 135 (30) 887 Cost of sales (376) (96) (89) 30 (531) Gross profit 204 106 46 356 Administrative costs (95) (24) (13) (142) Incorrect capitalisation of legal fee (W2) (2) Gain on step acquisition (W2)

3 7 Service cost (W8) (15) Other expenses (39) (20) (10) (85 9) Goodwill impairment Lyndhurst (W3) (10 5) Goodwill impairment Tybull (W4) (6 4) Operating profit 60 51 5 16 6 128 1 Net finance costs (12) (6) (4) (23 8) Pension (W8) (1 8) Profit before tax 46 2 45 5 12 6 104 3 Income tax expense (18) (12) (7) (50 2) Deferred tax adjustment (W7) (13 2) Profit for the year 15 33 5 5 6 54 1 Other comprehensive income Items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss Gains on property revaluation (W7) 44 8 17 0 61 8 Pension remeasurement loss (W8) (4 2) (4 2) Items that may be reclassified to profit or loss Exchange loss on translation of Tybull (W6) (85 9) (85 9) Other comprehensive income (45 3) 17 (28 3)

4 Total comprehensive income for year (30 3) 50 5 5 6 25 8 Working 2: Lyndhurst step acquisition Moorland obtains control over Lyndhurst on 1 July 2016. Lyndhurst therefore should be consolidated for the whole year (W1). On a step acquisition IFRS 3 Business Combinations requires the original 40% investment to be recognised at its acquisition-date fair value and the resulting gain or loss in profit or loss or other comprehensive income. The original shareholding would have been equity accounted as follows: $ million Cost of investment (40%) 100 Plus 40% of ($250m $230m) 8 Investment in associate at 30 June 2016 108 Since the fair value of a 40% interest at 1 July 2016 is $115 million, a gain of $7 million ($115m $108m) should be recorded within profit or loss of Moorland (W1).

5 In addition, the legal fees of $2 million should not have been included in the cost of investment but should be expensed (W1). Working 3: Lyndhurst goodwill impairment The goodwill impairment of Lyndhurst will be calculated as follows: $ million Fair value of original 40% investment at 1 July 2016 115 Fair value of extra 20% acquired ($64m $2m) 62 Fair value of 40% non-controlling interest at 1 July 2016 115 Less net assets at acquisition (250) Goodwill at acquisition 42 Impairment at 25% (W1) (10 5) Goodwill for consolidated SFP (not required) 31 5 15 Working 4.

6 Tybull goodwill The goodwill impairment of Tybull will be calculated as follows: dinar million Cost 990 Less net assets at acquisition (888) Goodwill at acquisition 102 Impairment at 25% (25 5) Goodwill for consolidated SFP 76 5 An exchange difference will arise on goodwill in the current year by comparing goodwill at the opening rate of exchange with goodwill at the closing rate of exchange. $m Goodwill of dinar 102m at opening rate of $1:3 5 dinar 29 1 Impairment of dinar 25 5m at average rate of $1:4 dinar (6 4) Exchange loss on goodwill (balancing figure) (7 4) Goodwill of dinar 76 5m at closing rate of $1:5 dinar 15 3 Consequently $6 4 million will be expensed to other expenses (W1).

7 A loss arises in other comprehensive income of $7 4 million (W6). Working 5: Tybull translation The intra-group transaction between Tybull and Moorland will need to be cancelled in the consolidated financial statements. Since the profits of Tybull will be translated at the average rate of exchange of $1:dinar 4, the adjustment will be $30m (120m dinar/4 (W1)). Unrealised profit of dinar 36m ((dinar 120m x 60/160) x 80%) will arise on the group transaction. Tybull s profit for the year will be adjusted for the extra depreciation arising from the fair value adjustment. Additional depreciation of dinar 24m will be expensed (48m/2) as part of cost of sales.

8 Tybull s profits will then be translated at the average rate of exchange as follows: dinar (millions) $ (millions) Revenue 540 135 Cost of sales (296 ) (74 ) Depreciation adjustment (24 ) (6 ) PURP (36 ) (9 ) Administrative costs (52 ) (13 ) Other expenses (40 ) (10 ) Net finance costs (16 ) (4 ) Income tax expense (28 ) (7 ) Profit after tax 48 12 Note that cost of sales will be $89m ($74m + $6m +$9m) (W1). Working 6: Other exchange differences on Tybull Further exchange differences will be recorded in other comprehensive income on the opening net assets of Tybull and their profit for the year.

9 The opening net assets are given as dinar 888 million. The exchange difference is calculated by translating this at the opening and closing exchange rates. dinar 888 million at opening rate of $1:dinar 3 5 = $253 7 million. dinar 888 million at closing rate of $1:dinar 5 = $177 6 million. An exchange loss of $76 1 million arises ($253 7 m $177 6 m). The revised profit of Tybull for the year is dinar 48 million (W5). An exchange difference arises by comparing the profit at the average rate of exchange ($12 million (W5)) with the closing rate of $1:5 dinar. Profit of dinar 48 million at closing rate of 5 = $9 6 million. A further exchange loss arises of $2 4 million ($12m $9 6m).

10 (Tutorial note: This excludes the goodwill impairment of Tybull since this forms part of the exchange difference on goodwill (W6)) Total exchange differences to total comprehensive income are therefore $85 9 million ($7 4 million (W4) + $76 1 million + $2 4 million). Working 7: Revaluation of property, plant and equipment A revaluation gain arises on the property of Moorland of $64 million ($450m $386m). This will be included within other comprehensive income. A deferred tax liability will arise of $69 million (($450m $220m) x 30%) at 30 June 2017. The movement on deferred tax should be posted each year and the opening deferred tax balance would have been $36 6 million 16(($422m $300m) x 30%).


Related search queries