Claims Drafting :Claims Drafting - WIPO

1 Claims Drafting : Claims Drafting : Defining the Scope of Search and Examination Kuala Lumpur, November 2011Dr Wolfgang TauchertDr. Wolfgang TauchertPresiding Judge (German Fed. Patent Court) Claims Drafting Claims Form and Function 1) Function1) Function Art. 84 EPC: The Claims shall define the matter for whichThe Claims shall define the matter for which protection is sought. They shall be - clear, - concise and - supported by the description. Art. 69(1) EPC: The extent of the protection conferred by a EttEttlitiEuropean patent or a European patent application shall be determined by the terms of the Claims . Nevertheless, the description and drawings shall be ,pgused to interpret the Claims (see also Protocol to Art. 69) . 2 Tauchert/Kuala Lumpur 2011 Claims Function : ( TheNameoftheGameistheClaim )(The Name of the Game is the claim ) Rule 29(1) (Guidelines C-III, ) The claim shall define the matter for which The claim shall define the matter for which protection is sought in terms of the technical features of the invention ; (i il i th l ilti )(similar in other legislations).

2 1) Claims define the subject of protection therefore and corresponding (broad/narrow) 2) claimsdefineequallythesubject of2) Claims define equally the subject of search and examination, 3 Tauchert/Kuala Lumpur 2011 Claims Function : ( TheNameoftheGameistheClaim )(The Name of the Game is the claim ) Claims shall define the invention by words. by the technical (structural and/or functional) features of the inventionfunctional) features of the invention There is no invention outside the Claims (even if it were, it wouldn t matter; this sounds tlbtiftithnatural, but is often overseen in the process of examination). The skilled person (assessing patentability) has the same level of knowledge and experience in understandingandexperience in understanding and interpreting the claimed application and the state of the art 4 Tauchert/Kuala Lumpur 2011 Form of a ClaimForm of a claim Basic structure: - Introducing part (Category, )-body (specific legal description of the- body (specific legal description of the invention by structural and/or functional features) - link (words/phrases like comprising, including, consisting of.

3 One part claim )or -one part claim - ) or characterized in (- two part claim ) (p) 5 Tauchert/Kuala Lumpur 2011 Form of a ClaimForm of a claim Dependent - / independent claim Formally: with / without reference toFormally: with / without reference to another claim within the same category Substantive: Further specification of an independent claim . Important: An independent claim has to present an independent solution of ppthe underlying objective problem of the invention. OthiL k f Uit!6 Otherwise: Lack of Unity! Tauchert/Kuala Lumpur 2011fCForm of a claim One part-/twopartclaimOne part - / two part claim Dependent - / independent claim Basic types (categories) of Claims : 1) Type entity: Product, apparatus, ) Type activity: Process, method, use. FthS iltFurther on: Special types, :1st and 2nd medical use, product-by-process, Markushgrouping, disclaimer7process, Markushgrouping, disclaimer Tauchert/Kuala Lumpur 2011 Form of a claim : One Part / Two Part (R l 21(1)b EPO G id li)(Rule 21(1)b EPO Guidelines) One part claim : p Presentation of the essential characteristics of the invention without structure as to state of the Art.

4 Example: Apparatus comprising features A, B, C, D .. TtliTwo part claim : Presentation of the essential characteristics of the invention with a structure according to the state of the art (so far as known)the art (so far as known) Apparatus with features A , B, characterized by features C, D .. characterized in that features C Dare comprisedcharacterized in that features C, D ..are comprised. Invention comprises all features of the claim !8claim ! Tauchert/Kuala Lumpur2011 Form of a claim : One Part / Two Part - Handling One part claim : Eachof the essential characteristics of the inventionEach of the essential characteristics of the invention (= the claim !) has to be referred to in state of the Art, as far as known. Example:Example: Apparatus comprising features A, B, C, D .. Doc. 1) provides an apparatus showing showing )pppggfeature A; Doc. 2) shows an apparatus with feature C) .. General: If there is no clear single starting document in the state of the art giving the base fort the invention, then a one part claim can be useful and taken into considerationand taken into consideration.

5 Invention comprises all features of the 9claim ! Tauchert/Kuala Lumpur2011 Form of a claim : One Part / Two Part - Example OtliOne part claim : From: Int. Application Nr. PCT/IB2003/005958 1) A Method of producing a soya bean product the1) A Method of producing a soya bean product, the method including the step of exposing soya beans to an acidic aqueous solution. 2) A method as claimed in claim 1 in whichthe2) A method as claimed in claim 1, in whichthe acidic aqueous solution has a pH of between about and 3) A method as claimed in claim 1 or claim 2, in ),which the soya beans are whole beans 4) A method as claimed in any one of the preceding Claims which includes the prior step of dissolving an organic acid in water to produce an aqueous acidic solution. 5) A method as claimed in claim 4 in which the iidiitiidorganic acid is citric acid. 10 Tauchert/Kuala Lumpur2011 Form of a claim : One Part / Two Part - Handling Two part claim : Introductory part characterizing part Ctlifi f tCategory, purpose, general - specific features Link: characterized in.

6 Or characterized Theintroductoryfeatures of the invention areThe introductory features of the invention aregenerally supposed to be known to the applicant. (US: definitly state of the art; Europe: Closest ) the characterizing featuresform the bodyof thethe characterizing features form the body of the invention with the specific features to be protected , introduced by characterized in ..(as far as known) Apparatus with features A , B, pp, ,characterized by features C, D .. If there is a document in the state of the art giving the clear base for the invention, then a two part claim is to be considered and useful. It should be applied whenever appropriate (EPO-practice). 11 Tauchert/Kuala Lumpur2011 Form of a claim : One Part / Two Part -Example Example Two part claim : 1) A dining table having legs evenly distributed around the periphery of the table top, which legs do not protrude beyond said periphery, characterized in that the table has three legs.

7 2) A dining table according to claim 1 characterized in that the legs are made of ply woodin that the legs are made of ply wood../.. Invention comprisesalland onlytheInvention comprises all and only the features of the claim ! 12 Tauchert/Kuala Lumpur2011 Independent Claims - No substantial reference to any other claim / independent solution of thep underlying objective problem (unity!) OftONLY ONE PERCATEGORY- Often: ONLY ONE PER CATEGORY (product, process, use, - except if a) alternative independent solutions of the same (objective) problem are to be considered (e g several processes to obtain ( several processes to obtain one and the same product or b) with interrelated products (plug 13 and socket, receiver/transmitter). Tauchert/Kuala Lumpur2011 Dependent Claims - Refer to one or more dependent and/or independentclaim: and/or independent claim : Apparatus according to claim 1 / claim 1 n / one of the Claims 1 - n further comprising.

8 Characterized in that it further .. - give further limitations/specifications to the Claims referred to; ;- show preferred embodiments fall back positions if claim 1 fails; tillth f tfth li- contains all the features of the Claims referred to plus ist own features. ! Check initial file covering !14 ! Check initial file covering ! Tauchert/Kuala Lumpur2011 BasicTypes of Claims -CategoriesBasic Types of Claims Categories - Product (compound, material, ) - Apparatus/device - Process (method for producing something, doing something ..); ! product obtained by the process is automatically protected with it! - Use (of a product to obtain a specific result; use claim is a special type of ;pyp process Claims 15 Tauchert/Kuala Lumpur2011 Interpretation of Claims -Rules for Practitioners-- Rules for Practitioners - (Non-)limitations: - Apparatus for .. , apparatus suitable for (purpose): apparatus suitable (purpose): Not limiting (except purpose describes subjects constructive features fishing /) hook/coat hook).

9 - Optional features, alternatives (especially, particularly): Not limitingthe (py,py)g scope, neither in protection nor in search. SMcomprising:openi e (a+b+others)- comprising: open (a+b+others) of: limiting (a+b only) 16 Tauchert/Kuala Lumpur2011 Interpretation of Claims Specialities - Process claim : Protection extends to the product directly obtained (Art. 64(2) EPC) - Use claim = process claim ! - Product by process claim : only if no other definition possible! 17 Tauchert/Kuala Lumpur2011 Interpretation of Claims Specialities to obtain appropriate protection -1st and 2nd medical use claim : 1st and 2nd medical use claim : Use of a known substance or composition for a new treatment composition for a new treatment substance X as pesticide - Use of substance X for producing a medicament fort he treatment of C ( Swiss type ) ( Swiss type ) - Markush grouping (multiple references): X selected from the group consisting X selected from the group consisting of a,b,c,d, e, f and g and any combinations thereof.

10 18 Tauchert/Kuala Lumpur2011 Final Highlighing in claim DraftingFinal Highlighing in claim Drafting Bl (bjtiftitdf- Be clear (objective facts instead of subjective judgement). - Be complete (covering all inventive features in a proper context). - Be supported (all parts of the Claims must (should) be fully explained in the description . -Be--literally word-for-word--- Be -- literally, word-for-word -- covered by the initial disclosure. 19 Tauchert/Kuala Lumpur2011 Thank You Thank You ? Questions ? 20 Tauchert/Kuala Lumpur2011))