Example: quiz answers

DOCUMENTS REQUIRED FOR DISCIPLINE GRIEVANCES i.e.: …

DOCUMENTS REQUIRED FOR DISCIPLINE GRIEVANCES :LETTERS OF WARNING, SUSPENSIONS and of the DISCIPLINE letter or letter of charges, (letter of warning, notice of suspension, notice ofremoval, etc.) of the grievant s statement.(Have the grievant write them out; help them, and supportthem.) It is imperative to get the grievant s version of what also helps protect of the Factual Report and all requests to higher authority for the the grievant, supervisor, concurring official and all witnesses including management all evidence management relied on to support their them on theevidence and obtain request any and all statements obtained by management duringtheir investigation and all evidence referenced in the letter of of all past elements cited in the letter of all past on past DISCIPLINE cited?

DOCUMENTS REQUIRED FOR DISCIPLINE GRIEVANCES i.e.: LETTERS OF WARNING, SUSPENSIONS and REMOVALS. 1. Copy of the discipline letter or letter of charges, (letter of warning, notice of suspension, notice of

Tags:

  Document, Required, Notice, Grievance, Warnings, Disciplines, Documents required for discipline grievances

Information

Domain:

Source:

Link to this page:

Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:

Other abuse

Transcription of DOCUMENTS REQUIRED FOR DISCIPLINE GRIEVANCES i.e.: …

1 DOCUMENTS REQUIRED FOR DISCIPLINE GRIEVANCES :LETTERS OF WARNING, SUSPENSIONS and of the DISCIPLINE letter or letter of charges, (letter of warning, notice of suspension, notice ofremoval, etc.) of the grievant s statement.(Have the grievant write them out; help them, and supportthem.) It is imperative to get the grievant s version of what also helps protect of the Factual Report and all requests to higher authority for the the grievant, supervisor, concurring official and all witnesses including management all evidence management relied on to support their them on theevidence and obtain request any and all statements obtained by management duringtheir investigation and all evidence referenced in the letter of of all past elements cited in the letter of all past on past DISCIPLINE cited?

2 Is it outdated? (Over 2 years as per Article ) in the grievance package the number of years of service the grievant has in the PostalService.(This could work both ways; in our favor or against : The employee should haveknown better or, on the other side of the coin, the employee should receive consideration for yearsof service.)Does the employee have any awards in their OPF?Request to review their RELATED of the of all 3971 s for the dates cited on the DISCIPLINE the 3971 s clear and legible?(If not, demand to review the original 3971 s.)Verify the dates with the grievant and supervisorand watch for errors.( : wrong dates, rest days, scheduled vs. non-scheduled, etc.) of 3972 s (both sides) for the past 2 to review the original to determine ifyour copy is of all medical documentation, including the medical officer s theemployee sent home by the medical unit?

3 (Not fit for duty?) of hours of sick leave and annual leave the employee is INVOLVING THE INSPECTION of item of the Investigative Memorandum generated by the Inspection all information stated in the Investigative Memorandum and interview all partiesreferenced in the all Postal Inspectors involved with the Postal Service s INTERVIEWS FOR ALL DISCIPLINE supervisor who issued the concurring witnesses for the witnesses for conducting interviews the steward should focus on the WHO, WHAT, WHERE, WHY, WHEN andHOW principles from all parties being interviewing the issuing supervisor andconcurring supervisor formulate your questions to work around the 7 TESTS OF JUST CAUSE and theabove-mentioned conducting the interview.

4 The steward should try to place the person being interviewed at ease andmake them feel very people being interviewed tend to clam up and perceive it as anadversarial wise steward should start the interview by explaining the reason and purposeof the interview to the allow the person speaking time to finish and never turn the interview into a confrontation even when you know the person speaking is not being truthfulwith to lead the person into giving the correct or honest is not always an easy to conducting interviews have all your facts your questions all written up and leavespace for your in mind that an answer to one question may lead to another toknow the answer to your questions before asking the date of the Day in Court (EL-921).

5 If you are the steward present during a day in courtprocess, you must take notes of the was the supervisor who interviewed the employee? if an interview really occurred? the employee given advanced notice that he faced possible DISCIPLINE and afforded anopportunity to defend him/her self? the supervisor lead the employee into believing that this meeting was just a discussion andeverything would be OK?(This happens far too many times.) the supervisor conduct some form of investigation while performing the Day in Court andencourage the employee to discuss the matter? the employee request a union representative be present during the Day in Court process?Remember an employee is not entitled to a union representative during an official discussion.

6 (Wemay be able to use the argument that when the employee was denied a steward that this had all themakings of an official discussion.)**NOTE**ASK THE GRIEVANT AND SUPERVISOR THE SAME day in court process is part of the grievant s due process have personally witnessed supervisorswho totally abuse the supervisor must conduct a fair and objective investigation into thealleged offense and the employees must be given an opportunity to defend you notice thedate on the day in court?This PRE-DISCIPLINARY INTERVIEW mustbe prior to requesting DISCIPLINE .(Also watch the date of the request for DISCIPLINE .)This Pre-Disciplinary interview falls under the test ofJust Cause; was a fair and objective investigation conducted prior to the disciplinary action being initiated?

7 There could not have been a fair and objective investigation into the matter if the grievant s account of theincident was not included in management s during this process must try todetermine if there was any mitigating factors involved, and did it have bearing on the grievant s American Postal Workers Union has been very successful in arbitration at overturning DISCIPLINE forthe lack of a pre-disciplinary cite in the grievance papers that management failed toconduct a fair and objective investigation by failing to conduct a pre-disciplinary isparticularly important to raise the issue of pre-disciplinary interview on the step 2-appeal FOR JUST CAUSEThe definition of just cause was really defined by Arbitrator Carroll Daugherty in Grief BrothersCooperage vs.

8 United Mine Workers District 50, 41 LA 555 and is the cornerstone used by virtually Daugherty formulated even (7) specific questions that must be answered in anarbitrator s mind to establish that a suspension or discharge was for just cause. A positive no answer toone or more of the questions would indicate that just cause did not questions are taken from the APWU Shop Steward the USPS give the employee forewarning or knowledge of the possible or probablydisciplinary consequences of the employee s conduct?In other words, was there some kind ofwritten (or oral) instructions governing the situation the employee is being disciplined for?Thiscould be a notice posted on a bulletin board or found in an order important thing is thatit must be proven that there was actual written or oral communication of these rules beforetheincident the rule or managerial order reasonably related to the orderly, efficient and safe operation ofthe USPS s business?

9 Even if he/she believes it s unreasonable, the employee must obey employee can later file a the USPS, before administering DISCIPLINE to an employee, make an effort to discover whetherthe employee did, in fact, violate or disobey a rule or order?The employee has a right to knowwhat he/she is being disciplined investigation should be made before disciplinary actionis too many cases, the action is taken without proper the USPS conduct the investigation fairly and objectively?(No comment needed.) the investigation, was there substantial evidence that the employee was guilty as charged? the USPS applied its rules, orders and penalties evenhandedly and without discrimination toall employees?Have other employees been guilty of the same infraction of rules and not receiveda disciplinary action?

10 The degree of DISCIPLINE administered by the Postal Service in a particular case reasonablyrelated to (a) the seriousness of the employee s proven offense, and (b) the record of the employeein his/her service with the USPS?It would not be just to fire an employee for being tardy twiceover a six-month period if he/she had an unblemished record for 15 years prior to theother hand, if the employee has a record of previous offenses, that record should not be used tojudge whether he/she is guilty of the latest the above will not guarantee a winner in all GRIEVANCES , but it should enhance their chances ofbeing settled Luck with your cas


Related search queries