EVALUATION REPORT - Santiago Canyon College

1 1 EVALUATION REPORT Santiago Canyon College Orange, California A confidential REPORT prepared for The Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges Western Association of Schools and Colleges The REPORT represents the findings of the EVALUATION team that visited Santiago Canyon College from October 6-9, 2014 Henry Yong, Chair 2 Date: February 6, 2015 Institution: Santiago Canyon College 8045 East Chapman Orange, CA 92869 Team REPORT : Comprehensive EVALUATION REPORT This REPORT represents the finding of the External EVALUATION Team That visited Santiago Canyon College October 6-9, 2014. Subject: Commission Revision to the Team REPORT The comprehensive External EVALUATION REPORT (Team REPORT ) for Santiago Canyon College provides details of the team s findings with regard to the College s policies, procedures, and practices and deficiencies in those policies, procedures, and practices which the team concluded led to noncompliance with Accreditation Standards.

2 The Team REPORT should be read carefully and used to understand the team s findings. Upon a review of the Team REPORT sent to the College , and the Institutional Self- EVALUATION REPORT and evidence submitted by the College , the following changes or corrections are noted by the Commission for the Team REPORT :1 Concerning Recommendation 1: The Commission found that the issues of noncompliance noted by previous teams in 2005 and 2008 had been resolved. Therefore, the 2014 recommendation is revised to read: Recommendation 1: In order to meet the Commission s 2012 expectation for meeting student learning outcomes standards, the team recommends that the College strengthen its assessment of program student learning outcomes to guide improvement. The College should also identify and address outcomes assessment for community services (community education). ( , , ) 1 The Team Chair has concurred with this change.

3 3 Santiago Canyon College External EVALUATION Visit Team Roster Monday, October 6 through Thursday, October 9, 2014 Mr. Henry Yong (Chair) President Evergreen Valley College Dr. Keiko Kimura (Assistant) Dean, Language Arts San Jose City College Ms. Kristina Allende Professor of English and Literature Mt. San Antonio College Dr. Markus Geissler Professor, Computer Information Science Cosumnes river College Dr. Stephen Payne Command Historian Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center Ms. Leticia Barajas Vice President Academic Affairs & Workforce Development Los Angeles Trade-Tech College Dr. Lisa Lawrenson Associate Vice President of Instruction, Curriculum and Basic Skills american river College Mr. Rick Rantz Dean, The Extended Campus Allan Hancock College Dr. Ron Oxford Librarian West Hills College Lemoore Dr. Patrick Schmitt Chancellor West Valley-Mission CCD Mr.

4 Robert Isomoto Vice President Business & Administration Santa Monica College Dr. Renee De Long Chomiak Dean of Counseling Services Cerritos College Mr. Michael Tuitasi Vice President Student Services Santa Monica College Mr. Erik Cooper Dean of Planning, Research, and Resource Development Sierra College 4 Summary of EVALUATION REPORT Institution: Santiago Canyon College Dates of Visit: October 6-9, 2014 Team Chair: Henry C. V. Yong , President, Evergreen Valley College A 14-member team visited Santiago Canyon College from October 6-9, 2014 for the purpose of evaluating how well the institution is achieving its stated purposes, analyzing how well the College is meeting the Commission standards, providing recommendations for quality assurance and institutional improvement, and submitting recommendations to the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges (ACCJC) regarding the status of the College .

5 In preparation for the visit, team members attended an all-day training session on September 12, 2014, conducted by the ACCJC, and studied Commission materials prepared for visiting team members. The team was divided into four committees, one for each standard. Team members read the College s self-study REPORT , including recommendations from the prior Santiago Canyon College visiting team, and assessed the printed, electronic, and online evidence provided by the College . A pre-visit was conducted by team chair and team assistant on September 11, 2014. Prior to the visit, team members completed written evaluations of the self-study and began identifying areas for further investigation. On the day before the formal visit, the team members met to discuss their views of the written materials provided by the College and reviewed the 2014 Self- EVALUATION completed in July 2014, and other materials submitted to the Commission since its last comprehensive visit.

6 During the visit the team met with over 80 faculty, staff, administration, members of the Board of Trustees, and students. The team chair and several team members met with members of the Board of Trustees, the President of the College , and various administrators. The team also attended two open forums to allow for comments from any member of the College . The team felt the self-study was well-organized and attractively presented. The College made evidence available and accommodated all requests for meetings and documentation. The team felt that the self-study REPORT was sound. The faculty and staff who attended the open forums were candid and collegial. Overall, the team found the self-study accurately reflects the College and the work they have done and continue to do to serve students. Through examination of documents and conversation with College stakeholders, the team determined that Santiago Canyon College is in compliance with respect to all Eligibility Requirements and Commission Policies.

7 With respect to the Standards, the team affirmed that the College has made substantial gains in the areas of course and institutional learning outcomes assessment , program review, and resource 5 allocation. Of the nine team recommendations and one Commission Recommendation addressed in the 2014 self- EVALUATION document, the team found that the College has responded satisfactorily to eight of these recommendations. The work involved in meeting the Standards has required significant efforts in recent years, which may be the reason why the College still needs time to complete EVALUATION cycles relative to planning and ensure that the results of these efforts are used to guide improvement. Completion of assessment cycles was a theme that emerged in five of the team s recommendations. Nevertheless, the team found the College has completed substantial work to date and has made significant strides since the 2005 and 2008 self-evaluations.

8 The team wishes to express its appreciation to and admiration for the College and its dedication to student success. 6 Commendations and Recommendations of the 2014 Visiting Team Commendations The members of the accreditation visiting team commend Santiago Canyon College for its dedicated engagement in the accreditation process and its openness in working with the visiting team members. The team recognizes the following accomplishments of note: 1. The team commends the College for its collegial atmosphere and high level of respect, professionalism, and collaboration. 2. The team commends the College for planning and designing an architecturally impressive, sustainably-focused campus which enhances the learning environment and fosters pride amongst the students and staff. 3. The team commends the College s maintenance and operations staff for its outstanding work in keeping a clean and well-maintained campus that enhances the student learning experience.

9 4. The team commends the College s level of collaboration in the development of 17 Associate Degrees for Transfer (ADT). 5. The team commends Student Services for their leadership in the development, assessment , dialogue, and use of results to guide sustainable quality improvement of student learning outcomes and service area outcomes. 6. The team commends the College library for its innovation in continuing and extending services to library patrons. In the wake of reduced library hours, the library has been able to support the College s dedication to student success by providing in-person reference services beyond open hours through the creation of an instant message/chat and text message system. 7. The team commends the College s Continuing Education division s commitment to serving the instructional and community needs of its service area, amidst significant staffing and facilities challenges.

10 8. The team commends the College for developing and sustaining the Student Transitioning and Registering Services (STARS) Program, operated through the Orange Education Center s (OEC) Division of Continuing Education, assisting students enrolled in the non-credit program to transition to degree-credit courses and programs. Recommendations As a result of the October 2014 visit, the team made the following recommendations: 1. In order to meet the Commission s 2012 expectation for meeting student learning outcomes standards, the team recommends that the College strengthen its assessment of program student learning outcomes to guide improvement. The College should also 7 identify and address outcomes assessment for community services (community education). ( , , ) 2. In order to meet the standard, the team recommends that the College establish formal systematic measures for periodically assessing, evaluating, and modifying its integrated planning and resource allocation processes at both the College and district.