Example: confidence

Feasibility of a Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE ...

Feasibility of a Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) Program for commercial Buildings in multnomah county , OregonPrepared for the multnomah county Office of SustainabilityJuly 2012 April 21, 2012 Personnel PoliciesCompany Organization and ManagementECON orthwest is an employee-owned consulting firm. John Tapogna serves as President and chief executive officer (CEO) and is ultimately responsible for all corporate decisions. John reports to the shareholders and is assisted by Paul Mal-lon, who serves as both chief operating officer (COO) and chief financial officer (CFO) and who is responsible for managing the day-to-day operations and finances of the company s work consists of projects, most of which are conducted under con-tract for clients, but which also include internal efforts, such as research and de-velopment or marketing.

Feasibility of a Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) Program for Commercial Buildings in Multnomah County, Oregon Prepared for the Multnomah County Office of Sustainability

Tags:

  Programs, County, Property, Commercial, Building, Energy, Clean, Cape, Assessed, Multnomah, Property assessed clean energy, Program for commercial buildings in multnomah county

Information

Domain:

Source:

Link to this page:

Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:

Other abuse

Transcription of Feasibility of a Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE ...

1 Feasibility of a Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) Program for commercial Buildings in multnomah county , OregonPrepared for the multnomah county Office of SustainabilityJuly 2012 April 21, 2012 Personnel PoliciesCompany Organization and ManagementECON orthwest is an employee-owned consulting firm. John Tapogna serves as President and chief executive officer (CEO) and is ultimately responsible for all corporate decisions. John reports to the shareholders and is assisted by Paul Mal-lon, who serves as both chief operating officer (COO) and chief financial officer (CFO) and who is responsible for managing the day-to-day operations and finances of the company s work consists of projects, most of which are conducted under con-tract for clients, but which also include internal efforts, such as research and de-velopment or marketing.

2 Each project is assigned to a project manager and groups of projects are assigned to practice area leaders. Practice area leaders, who may also serve as project managers for some of their projects, are responsible for quality control on projects, developing markets and reputation, developing and implementing strategies for growth within their practice areas, developing and maintaining relationships with clients and subcontractors, and for identifying staffing needs, including the skills and expertise needed from new hires. Practice areas generally are defined by combinations of topics and methods and may overlap. Practice area leaders report to the President (John Ta-pogna), who is responsible for coordinating the efforts of all practice managers are responsible for managing the day-to-day work on projects and are encouraged to develop the skills, expertise, and client relationships neces-sary to become practice area leaders.

3 Project managers report to the practice area leader for each project they are working on and are managed by the President (John Tapogna).Research associates work on projects under the direction of project managers. Administrative staff provide bookkeeping, information technology, communication, and production support for the entire firm. Research associates and administrative staff are managed by the COO (Paul Mallon).Page 1 This material is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy under Award Number DE-EE0000926 and was prepared by ECON orthwest, which is solely responsible for its content. The authors, Randall Pozdena and Carl Batten, would like to acknowledge the contributions of.

4 David Baylon, EcotopeKathryn Maghan and Margot Brandenburg, Rockefeller FoundationRon Herbst, Deutsche BankCliff Staton, Renewable FundingDavid Moore, PFMD aniel Flemington and Robin Messina, REISPhil Degens, Energy Trust of OregonPeter White, Johnson ControlsNick Popenuk, Rob Wyman, Sean Wallace, Tessa Krebs, and Alec Josephson, ECON orthwestECON orthwest has prepared this report based on our general knowledge of Energy -efficiency program management and finance and on information derived from government agencies, private statistical services, the reports of others, interviews of individuals, or other sources believed to be reliable. ECON orthwest has not verified the accuracy of such information, however, and makes no representation regarding its accuracy or completeness.

5 Any statements nonfactual in nature constitute the authors' current opinions, which may change as more information becomes report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof.

6 The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency more information about this report, please contact: Carl BattenECON orthwest222 SW Columbia St., Suite 1600 Portland, Oregon of commercial PACEP roperty Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) loans finance investments in Energy -efficiency improvements to buildings and are repaid through Property tax or other assessments on the building . They have several important advantages over other sources of funding. When a building is improved to become more efficient, the improvements must be paid for immediately, but the Energy -cost savings accrue over many years. It generally takes several years to recover the initial cost of the improvements.

7 Financing allows the building owner to match the stream of cash outflows to the stream of utility-bill savings and to enjoy small increases in net cash flow during the repayment period and larger increases thereafter. Matching the streams of cash flows over time also can make more-extensive ( deeper ) retrofits feasible for a cash-constrained building owner. The increase in net cash flow makes the building worth more, so lenders generally view loans for cost-effective Energy -efficiency improvements as a good risk. But there are three factors that limit the usefulness and availability of traditional loans to building owners for Energy the building changes ownership, the entire balance on the loan comes due and must be paid off by the seller.

8 The seller incurs the full cost of the improvements, but only realizes their benefits to the extent that the value of lower future utility bills are capitalized into the selling price of the the building owner is unable to continue paying both the mortgage and the loan for the improvements, the mortgage gets paid first. In the case of foreclosure, the balance on the first mortgage will be fully paid before the lender on the Energy -efficiency loan gets anything. the building is leased and the tenants are responsible for utility bills, the owner bears all of the cost of the improvements, but the tenant enjoys the reduced utility bills. The owner can only recover the benefits of the improvements to the extent he can raise the rent higher than it would otherwise be after the current lease expires.

9 From the lender s perspective, the Energy -cost savings do not improve the borrower s ability to repay the these reasons, traditional loans to finance Energy -efficiency improvements are available only to building owners with substantial equity in their buildings and strong cash flow before the improvements. They also can be expensive, unless subsidized, and tax revenues to provide subsidies are limited. building owners with triple-net leases do not have much incentive to achieve Energy efficiency if they can t recapture the cost loans overcome all three of these limitations of the usefulness or availability of traditional financing arrangements by tying the repayment to the Property , not the current Property owner.

10 The repayment continues through change in ownership, including foreclosure, and a tenant with a triple-net lease makes the loan payments while enjoying reduced utility bills. Local governments can facilitate Energy efficiency without having to fund subsidies. commercial PACE Feasibility 1 ECON orthwestSummary of FindingsThis study describes how a commercial PACE program might be implemented in multnomah county under current Oregon law, estimates the potential size of the market within the county , examines issues related to PACE financing and program implementation, and estimates the economic and environmental benefits and the economic impacts that would result from the work that would be funded if all buildings identified as good candidates for participation in the next five years were to Oregon law, PACE loans would be repaid through a local improvement district (LID) assessment, rather than through Property taxes.


Related search queries