FEMA Incident Action Planning Guide

1 January 2012 FEMA Incident Action Planning Guide i Contents Chapter 1: Introduction .. 1 Purpose .. 3 Applicability and Scope .. 3 Authorities and Foundational Documents .. 3 Chapter 2: The Incident Action Planning Process .. 5 Incident Action Planning .. 5 The Planning P and the operations O .. 6 What is the IAP? .. 7 Phase 1: Understand The Situation .. 8 Gaining Initial Situational Awareness .. 8 Establishing Initial Incident Priorities .. 9 Developing the Action Planning Team .. 10 Initiating Incident Action Planning .. 11 Conducting Incident Action Planning Meetings and Briefings .. 11 Phase 2: Establish Incident Objectives .. 17 Responsibilities .. 17 Priorities .. 17 Incident Objectives .. 18 Table 2. Priorities Objectives Strategies Tactics, Tasks, Work Assignments .. 19 UCG Develops and Update Objectives .. 20 The C&GS Meeting .. 20 Phase 3: Develop the Plan .. 22 Responsibilities for operations Planning .. 22 Strategies.

2 23 Using the Operational Planning Worksheet (FEMA-ICS Form 215) .. 27 The operations Tactics Meeting .. 29 Phase 4: Prepare and Disseminate the Plan .. 30 Planning Section Responsibilities .. 32 January 2012 FEMA Incident Action Planning Guide ii General Staff .. 37 Additional Items to the IAP .. 38 The Planning Meeting .. 38 Printing and Distributing the IAP .. 39 Phase 5: Execute, Evaluate, and Revise the Plan .. 40 operations Briefing .. 40 Assess Progress and Effectiveness .. 42 Ending Incident Action Planning .. 42 Appendix A: How to Develop Incident Objectives .. 43 Appendix B: Incident Command System Map Symbols .. 47 Appendix C: Job Aids for Staff Preparing FEMA ICS Forms for the IAP .. 48 Appendix D: Final Quality Assurance Checklist .. 56 Appendix E: Maintaining Situational Awareness Throughout the Life Cycle of The Incident .. 57 Information Collection Plan .. 57 Situational Awareness Products .. 57 Situation Update Briefing.

3 58 Responsibilities .. 58 Summary .. 59 Annex 1: Acronyms .. 60 Annex 2: Glossary .. 62 January 2012 FEMA Incident Action Planning Guide 1 Incident The National Incident Management System Glossary defines Incident as an occurrence, natural or manmade, that requires a response to protect life or property. For the purposes of this Guide , the term, Incident , is used to refer to incidents in which FEMA is involved, generally in support of and in partnership with State, territorial, tribal, and local governments. CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION The Federal Emergency Management Agency s (FEMA) primary mission is to reduce the loss of life and property and protect the Nation from all hazards. When FEMA becomes involved in an Incident , it is because the scope and scale of the Incident necessitates Federal assistance. When FEMA is engaged, officials from the State and local government are also involved along with nongovernmental organizations (NG0s), elements of the private sector, and more than likely other Federal departments and agencies.

4 Ensuring that the efforts of all players are coordinated and synchronized to achieve the best results is the job of Incident management. It is also the reason that the National Incident Management System and the Incident Command System (ICS) exist. The Incident Action Planning process provides a tool to synchronize operations at the Incident level and ensures that Incident operations are conducted in support of Incident objectives. The iterative Incident Action Planning process provides FEMA and all interagency partners involved in Incident management operations the primary tool for managing incidents. A disciplined system of Planning phases and collaboration sessions fosters partnerships and clearly focuses Incident operations . Over many years of managing all types and sizes of incidents, ICS practitioners have developed and refined the Incident Action Planning process as a way to plan and execute operations on any Incident .

5 This means that Incident Action Planning is more than producing an Incident Action plan (IAP). It is a set of activities, repeated each operational period, that provides a consistent rhythm and structure to Incident management. The organizations that originated ICS and use the system have, after many years of trial and error, developed a set of forms that assist Incident personnel in completing this integrated process. Incident leaders must ensure that the plan being developed meets the needs of the Incident . Such leaders must also ensure that the forms while valuable for moving along the path do not become the primary focus of the Planning process. The completion of these forms assists the integrated and rational Planning process. FEMA has slightly modified these standard ICS forms to address the implementation of assistance programs and the requirements for assigning resources. Incident Action Planning is an operational activity and must either direct or support operations .

6 January 2012 FEMA Incident Action Planning Guide 2 Because ICS is the basis for managing Incident activities, all incidents to which FEMA responds require the use of the ICS Incident Action Planning process. All members of the Unified Coordination Group and the command and general staff play specific and essential parts in the process. This includes not just FEMA staff, but also our State and Federal interagency partners who are engaged in Incident management. When each member plays his/her part correctly, the process is a tool that can bring order to the often chaotic world of managing complex incidents and enables Incident management personnel to address problems that seem insurmountable. Because incidents in which FEMA is engaged are complex and intergovernmental and interagency, applying the Incident Action Planning process accurately, consistently, and completely is essential to the success of Incident operations . Disciplined application of the Incident Action Planning process produces positive effects on incidents of all size and scope and maintains the otherwise perishable Planning skills of FEMA personnel.

7 While the process described in this Guide outlines how FEMA as a part of the whole community executes Incident Action Planning , those involved in a FEMA response and recovery must recognize that it will, in all probability, not be the only Incident Action Planning process being executed (as illustrated in Figure 1 below). For example, local and municipal organizations may develop IAPs to Guide the actions of first responders. For a catastrophic Incident there may be hundreds of concurrent Incident Action Planning efforts taking place simultaneously. The joint IAP that State and Federal Incident management personnel develop must support all local IAPs and synchronize those at the State and Federal level. Figure 1: IAPs Developed Across All Echelons of an Incident Joint Federal and State IAP County IAP County Law Enforcement IAP Joint State and Local Fire IAP City IAP City Fire IAP City Police IAP Joint Search and Rescue IAP Joint Emergency Route Clearance IAP County IAP County IAP January 2012 FEMA Incident Action Planning Guide 3 PURPOSE This Guide is intended to promote the effectiveness of FEMA Incident operations by standardizing the Incident Action Planning process.

8 The Guide explains the ICS Incident Action Planning process, describes how FEMA applies it on all FEMA incidents, defines the specific roles and responsibilities of the various players, and establishes standards for Incident Action Planning on FEMA incidents. This Guide also communicates to FEMA s partners the details of how the agency conducts the Incident Action Planning process. This Guide is also intended to serve as a reference for Incident personnel and to provide the basis for FEMA Incident Action Planning staffing and exercising. Finally, this Guide informs the required training, position task books, and development of courses for the positions of the FEMA Qualification System. APPLICABILITY AND SCOPE The guidance contained in this Incident Action Planning Guide applies to all FEMA incidents, including those involving Presidential declarations under the Stafford Act, as well as incidents requiring a coordinated Federal response where the Stafford Act does not apply.

9 Compliance with this guidance is mandatory for all FEMA personnel. This Guide is also intended to promote cooperation and interoperability among all levels of government, NGOs, and the private sector by communicating FEMA s commitment to Incident Action Planning to our partners and sharing the details of how FEMA implements the process. AUTHORITIES AND FOUNDATIONAL DOCUMENTS A number of foundational documents provide statutory, regulatory, and executive guidance for FEMA disaster response. Some key foundational documents are as follows: Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (Public Law 93-288, as amended, 42 5121-5207) Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Emergency Management and Assistance Homeland Security Act (Public Law 107-296, as amended, 6 101 et seq.) Homeland Security Presidential Directive 5, 2003 Post-Katrina Emergency Management Reform Act of 2006 (Public Law 109-295), October 4, 2006 National Response Framework, January 2008 National Disaster Recovery Framework, September 2011 National Incident Management System, December 2008 The Federal Emergency Management Agency Publication 1, November 2010 Incident Management and Support Keystone, January 2011 Comprehensive Preparedness Guide 101--Developing and Maintaining State, Territorial, Tribal, and Local Government Emergency Plans, January 2009 January 2012 FEMA Incident Action Planning Guide 4 Presidential Policy Directive 8: National Preparedness, March 2011.

10 National Preparedness Goal, September 2011 FEMA Incident Management Handbook (FEMA B-761/Interim Change 1), expires January 1, 2013 January 2012 FEMA Incident Action Planning Guide 5 CHAPTER 2: THE Incident Action Planning PROCESS Incident Action Planning Incident management personnel involved in an operation that the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is coordinating use the Incident Command System s (ICS) Incident Action Planning process to develop Incident Action plans (IAPs). All partners involved in the Incident (Emergency Support Functions [ESFs], nongovernmental organizations [NGOs], and State) achieve unity of effort through its disciplined process. Additionally, the IAP is the vehicle by which the senior leaders of an Incident ; the governor of an affected state, through the State Coordinating Officer (SCO); and the President, through the Federal Coordinating Officer (FCO), communicate their expectations and provide clear guidance to those managing an Incident .