Example: bankruptcy

Florida U.S. History End-of-Course Assessment Test …

History End-of-Course Assessment Test Item Specifications Copyright Statement for This Office of Assessment Publication Authorization for reproduction of this document is hereby granted to persons acting in an official capacity within the Uniform System of Public K 12 Schools as defined in Section (4), Florida Statutes. The copyright notice at the bottom of this page must be included in all copies. All trademarks and trade names found in this publication are the property of their respective owners and are not associated with the publishers of this publication. Permission is NOT granted for distribution or reproduction outside of the Uniform System of Public K 12 Florida Schools or for commercial distribution of the copyrighted materials without written authorization from the Florida Department of Education.

1 Introduction Origin and Purpose of the Specifications Scope of this Document Overall Considerations 3 Criteria for U.S. History End-of-Course Assessment Test Items

Tags:

  Assessment, Course, History, History end of course assessment

Information

Domain:

Source:

Link to this page:

Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:

Other abuse

Transcription of Florida U.S. History End-of-Course Assessment Test …

1 History End-of-Course Assessment Test Item Specifications Copyright Statement for This Office of Assessment Publication Authorization for reproduction of this document is hereby granted to persons acting in an official capacity within the Uniform System of Public K 12 Schools as defined in Section (4), Florida Statutes. The copyright notice at the bottom of this page must be included in all copies. All trademarks and trade names found in this publication are the property of their respective owners and are not associated with the publishers of this publication. Permission is NOT granted for distribution or reproduction outside of the Uniform System of Public K 12 Florida Schools or for commercial distribution of the copyrighted materials without written authorization from the Florida Department of Education.

2 Questions regarding use of these copyrighted materials should be sent to the following: The Administrator Office of Assessment Florida Department of Education Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0400 Copyright 2010 State of Florida Department of State |iTABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction Origin and Purpose of the Specifications Scope of this Document Overall Considerations 3 Criteria for History End-of-Course Assessment Test Items Use of Graphics Item Style and Format Scope of Test Items Guidelines for Item Writers 7 Item Difficulty and Cognitive Complexity of History End-of-Course Assessment Test Items Item Difficulty Cognitive Complexity Universal Design 14 Review Procedures for History End-of-Course Assessment Test Items Review for Potential Bias and Community Sensitivity Review of Test Items 15 Guide to the Individual Benchmark Specifications

3 Benchmark Classification System Definitions of Benchmark Specifications 18 Individual Benchmark Specifications for History End-of-Course Assessment A 1 Appendix A: Directions for Item Review and History End-of-Course Assessment Item Rating Form B 1 Appendix B: History Content Assessed by History End-of-Course Assessment C 1 Appendix C: History Item Writer Glossary D 1 Appendix D: History End-of-Course Assessment Test Design Summary E 1 Appendix E: History course Descriptions History End-of-Course Assessment Test Item Specifications Florida Department of Education | i ii | History End-of-Course Assessment Test Item Specifications Florida Department of Education |1 INTRODUCTION In recent years, two realities focused attention on the need to reevaluate Florida s Sunshine State Standards (Standards).

4 First, in 2005, outside consultants reviewed the 1996 Standards and suggested that the benchmark language offer greater specificity to indicate clearly what teachers should teach and what students should be able to do. Second, federal legislation through the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) holds schools and school districts accountable for how well each child is learning, which further emphasized the need to hone expectations for all students. In December 2008, the Florida State Board of Education adopted the Next Generation Sunshine State Standards (NGSSS) for Social Studies. These standards will be used to develop the History End-of-Course Assessment . The Florida State Board of Education has made the standards available online at: ).

5 The NGSSS are divided into benchmarks that identify what a student should know and be able to do following completion of the course . This document, History End-of-Course Assessment Test Item Specifications (Specifications), provides details about the portion of the standards Assessment designed to assess History and includes information about the benchmarks, the stimulus types, and the test items. The Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT ) measures achievement of Florida students in reading and mathematics at Grades 3 through 8, and in science at Grades 5 and 8. End-of-Course (EOC) assessments measure achievement of Florida students who have completed coursework in Algebra 1, Geometry, Civics, and Biology 1.

6 The History EOC Assessment measures achievement of Florida students enrolled in History , specifically American History (2100310) or American History Honors (2100320), or an equivalent course , by assessing student progress on benchmarks from the NGSSS that are assigned to History course descriptions. Origin and Purpose of the Specifications The Florida Department of Education and committees of experienced Florida educators developed and approved the Specifications. The Specifications is a resource that defines the content and format of the test and test items for item writers and reviewers. The Specifications indicates the alignment of test items with the NGSSS. It also serves to provide all stakeholders with information about the scope and function of the End-of-Course assessments.

7 Scope of this Document The Specifications for the History EOC Assessment provides general guidelines for the development of all test items used in the Assessment . The Overall Considerations section in this Introduction provides an explanation of the History concepts and elements assessed by the test. The Criteria for History EOC Assessment Test Items section explains the general guidelines for selection and development of multiple-choice items. The Item Difficulty and Cognitive Complexity of History EOC Assessment Test Items section addresses cognitive complexity levels as well as item difficulty and universal design. The Review Procedures for History EOC Assessment Test Items section covers the review processes used to ensure the quality of the stimuli and test items.

8 The Individual Benchmark Specifications section contains specific information about each benchmark. This section provides benchmark clarification statements, content limits, stimulus attributes, and a sample item for each benchmark. History End-of-Course Assessment Test Item Specifications Florida Department of Education | 1 Overall Considerations This section of the Specifications describes the guidelines that apply to all test items developed for the History EOC Assessment . Overall considerations are broad item-development issues that should be addressed during the development of test items. Sections of Criteria for History EOC Assessment Test Items relate more specifically to one aspect of the development ( , content limits or stimulus attributes).

9 1. Most test items should be written to measure primarily one benchmark; however, other benchmarks may also be reflected in the item context. 2. Some benchmarks are combined for Assessment ; the individual specification indicates which benchmarks are combined. 3. Test items should be appropriate for students in terms of course content experience and difficulty, cognitive development, and reading level. 4. Test items should be written to match a variety of cognitive levels. Each benchmark should be assessed by items of varying cognitive complexity. 5. The reading level of the test items should be Grade 10, except for specifically assessed History terms or concepts. 6. Test items should assess the application of the concept rather than the memorization of History dates, names, facts, laws, or theories unless otherwise noted in the individual benchmark specifications.

10 7. Test items should not require the student to define terms but to understand terms used in context. 8. Test items must not require the creation of a chart, graph, or table. 9. Each test item should be written to clearly elicit the desired response. 10. Test items should not be designed to create a disadvantage or exhibit disrespect to anyone in regard to age, gender, race, ethnicity, language, religion, socioeconomic status, disability, occupation, or geographic region. 11. Test items should be written in the past tense. 12. All test items should be placed in a real-world context unless otherwise noted in the individual benchmark specifications. The context should lead the student cognitively to the question.


Related search queries