FRCP Protocol Manual - VFS International

1 Document Author: Head of SHEQ Document Reviewer: Head of SHEQ PAGE DOCUMENT NO. Implemented Date REVISION EFFECTIVE DATE PR-CRC-SHEQ-FRCP 1 - 10 September 2012 2 December 2015 Page 1 of 43 THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF SAMANCOR CHROME AND IS CONFIDENTIAL. IT MAY NOT BE COPIED OR DIVULGED TO 3RD PARTIES WITHOUT PERMISSION - THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT CONTROLLED IF PRINTED . Title PURPOSE To govern and reduce risk associated with activities related to the Samancor Chrome Fatal Risk Protocols BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE All current Samancor Chrome FRCP s incorporated into a combined Manual .

2 Revision 2 Changes added to Annexure 1 page 43 APPROVAL SIGNATURES RECORD REVIEWER ROLE NAME SIGNATURE DATE Document Owner Samancor Chrome, Head of SHEQ, on behalf of the SHEQ Council Hard Copy Signed Dec 2015 Reviewer 1 General Manager, FMT Hard Copy Signed Dec 2015 Reviewer 2 General Manager, MFC Hard Copy Signed Dec 2015 Reviewer 3 General Manager, TFC Hard Copy Signed Dec 2015 Reviewer 4 General Manager, ECM Hard Copy Signed Dec 2015 Reviewer 5 General Manager, WCM Hard Copy Signed Dec 2015 Reviewer 6 Head Of SHEQ Hard Copy Signed Dec 2015 Reviewer 7 Chief Operating Officer Hard Copy Signed Dec 2015 Document Administrator Group SHEQ Administrator Hard Copy Signed Dec 2015 FRCP Protocol Manual Document Author: Head of SHEQ Document Reviewer: Head of SHEQ PAGE DOCUMENT NO.

3 Implemented Date REVISION EFFECTIVE DATE PR-CRC-SHEQ-FRCP 1 - 10 September 2012 2 December 2015 Page 2 of 43 THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF SAMANCOR CHROME AND IS CONFIDENTIAL. IT MAY NOT BE COPIED OR DIVULGED TO 3RD PARTIES WITHOUT PERMISSION - THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT CONTROLLED IF PRINTED . Approved By CEO Hard Copy Signed Dec 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Intent .. 3 Reason for Inclusion .. 3 Application Who this applies to .. 4 Performance Requirements .. 5 Light Vehicles .. 5 Surface Mobile Equipment .. 8 Underground Mobile Equipment.

4 10 Underground Ground Control .. 13 Hazardous Materials .. 15 Molten Materials Management .. 19 Equipment Safeguarding .. 21 Isolation and Permit to Work .. 23 Working at Heights .. 25 Lifting Operations .. 29 Appendices .. 32 SHEQ Protocol Links .. 32 Appendix I Minimum Requirements for Traffic Management .. 34 Appendix II Isolation and Permit to Work Features .. 35 Appendix III Critical Crane Lifts .. 37 Appendix IV Generic Definitions .. 37 Appendix V FRCP Specific Definitions .. 38 ANNEXURES ..43 Document Author: Head of SHEQ Document Reviewer: Head of SHEQ PAGE DOCUMENT NO.

5 Implemented Date REVISION EFFECTIVE DATE PR-CRC-SHEQ-FRCP 1 - 10 September 2012 2 December 2015 Page 3 of 43 THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF SAMANCOR CHROME AND IS CONFIDENTIAL. IT MAY NOT BE COPIED OR DIVULGED TO 3RD PARTIES WITHOUT PERMISSION - THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT CONTROLLED IF PRINTED . Intent This Fatal Risk Control Protocol (FRCP) provides the Samancor Chrome mandatory minimum performance requirements in ten key fatal risk areas with the intent to prevent the occurrence of fatalities and significant incidents. Reason for Inclusion Over the past years, many severe and sometimes fatal incidents have occurred at Samancor Chrome.

6 Cause-analysis of the events indicated that the majority of these incidents could be categorised into ten categories. The analysis also indicated that virtually all causes can be linked to a deviation from or disregard of some form of rule or the lack thereof. These categories are listed under the following: 1. Light Vehicles (LV) 2. Surface Mobile Equipment (SME) 3. Underground Ground Control (UGC) 4. Underground Mobile Equipment 5. Hazardous Materials Management, including Explosives (HAZMET) 6. Molten Materials Management (MMM) 7. Isolation (ISO) 8. Equipment Safeguarding (ES) 9. Working at Heights (WAH) 10.

7 Lifting Equipment (LE) Following this categorisation of causes, a Gap assessment was done throughout Samancor Chrome on these categories to determine the need for procedural guidance and rules. The outcome of this Gap assessment resulted in the drafting and implementation of the Fatal Risk Control Protocols (FRCPs).. Document Author: Head of SHEQ Document Reviewer: Head of SHEQ PAGE DOCUMENT NO. Implemented Date REVISION EFFECTIVE DATE PR-CRC-SHEQ-FRCP 1 - 10 September 2012 2 December 2015 Page 4 of 43 THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF SAMANCOR CHROME AND IS CONFIDENTIAL. IT MAY NOT BE COPIED OR DIVULGED TO 3RD PARTIES WITHOUT PERMISSION - THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT CONTROLLED IF PRINTED.

8 Application Who this applies to These Protocols apply to all Samancor Chrome controlled sites and activities and include all Samancor Chrome employees, contractors and visitors when involved in controlled activities. The SHEQ Council is the custodian of the FRCPs and from there, each site GM, with the guidance of the SHEQ Manager, shall identify FRCP Protocol champions who will be tasked with the coordination and up-keep of these protocols. Line management at all controlled activities shall participate in maintaining these Protocols relevant to their areas of responsibility. Fatal Risk Control Protocols Champions Protocol SHEQ Champion 1.

9 Light Vehicles SHEQ Manager TFC 2. Surface Mobile Equipment SHEQ Manager TFC 3. Underground Mobile Equipment SHEQ Manager WCM 4. Underground Ground Control ECM S&H Manager 5. Hazardous Materials Management Group Environmental Manager E&Q Manager ECM 6. Molten Materials Management SHEQ Manager MFC 7. Equipment Safeguarding SHEQ Manager FM 8. Isolation SHEQ Manager FM 9. Working at heights Head of SHEQ 10. Lifting SHEQ Manager MFC Document Author: Head of SHEQ Document Reviewer: Head of SHEQ PAGE DOCUMENT NO. Implemented Date REVISION EFFECTIVE DATE PR-CRC-SHEQ-FRCP 1 - 10 September 2012 2 December 2015 Page 5 of 43 THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF SAMANCOR CHROME AND IS CONFIDENTIAL.

10 IT MAY NOT BE COPIED OR DIVULGED TO 3RD PARTIES WITHOUT PERMISSION - THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT CONTROLLED IF PRINTED . Performance Requirements The mandatory requirements of these Protocols are signified by the use of the word shall . The word should indicates that the primary intent is to comply with the full requirements as if they were mandatory. However, there will be circumstances where local conditions may demonstrate that the requirement is either not applicable or an alternative approach is necessary. In cases where should has been used in a requirement, variation can only be considered as compliance if the most senior manager of the operation approves it, based on an evaluation of the risk.