Functioning of the Public Distribution System - PRS

1 Functioning of the Public Distribution System An Analytical Report Sakshi Balani December 2013. Public Distribution System and Food Security Objective During September 2013, Parliament passed the National Food Security Act (NFSA), 2013. The NFSA seeks to make the right to food a legal entitlement by providing subsidised food grains to nearly two-thirds of the population. The Act relies on the existing Targeted Public Distribution System (TPDS) mechanism to deliver these entitlements. This note describes the Functioning of the existing TPDS mechanism and the role played by the centre and states. It also explores challenges in the effective implementation of TPDS and alternatives to reform the existing machinery. The existing TPDS operates through a multi-level process in which the centre and states share Back-end responsibilities.

2 The centre is responsible for procuring or buying food grains, such as wheat and rice, process from farmers at a minimum support price. It also allocates the grains to each state on the basis of a formula. Within the total number of poor in each state, state governments are responsible for identifying eligible households. The centre transports the grains to the central depots in each state. After that, each state government is responsible for delivering the allocated food grains from these depots to each ration shop. The ration shop is the end point at which beneficiaries buy their food grains entitlement. Analyses of TPDS have revealed several gaps in implementation. These challenges pertain to the Challenges inaccurate identification of households and a leaking delivery System . Expert studies have shown that PDS suffers from nearly 61% error of exclusion and 25% inclusion of beneficiaries, the misclassification of the poor as non-poor and vice versa.

3 Another challenge is the leakage of food grains during transportation to the ration shop and from the ration shop itself into the open market. There are other issues to consider with regard to trends in procurement vis- -vis production of food grains. As recent data show, the central government procures about a third of the quantity of cereals produced domestically. However, the amount slated for procurement is expected to increase under Issues the Act, raising concerns regarding the sustainability of such a food delivery mechanism. There are also concerns regarding the financial feasibility of such a System . The centre bears a large financial burden, the food subsidy, because the cost of procuring and delivering food grains is about six times its sale price. It is anticipated that the food subsidy will rise steadily due to the increased procurement of grains under the Act, related costs and other factors.

4 Furthermore, a performance audit by the Comptroller and Auditor General has revealed a serious shortfall in the government s storage capacity. Given the increasing procurement and incidents of rotting food grains, the lack of adequate covered storage is bound to be a cause for concern. Despite the existence of these challenges, several states have implemented reforms to address gaps in Reforms implementation. It is important to note that while the centre plays a big role in implementing TPDS, to TPDS. states have flexibility to tailor TPDS according to their own priorities. This is demonstrated in states in different ways. Tamil Nadu implements a universal PDS, such that every household is entitled to subsidised food grains. States such as Chhattisgarh and Madhya Pradesh have implemented IT. measures to streamline TPDS, through the digitisation of ration cards, the use of GPS tracking of delivery, and the use of SMS based monitoring by citizens.

5 Other alternatives to TPDS include cash transfers and food coupons. Beneficiaries would directly be Alternatives given either cash or coupons which can be exchanged for food grains. There are several arguments to TPDS both in favour and against the effectiveness of such measures. Efforts have been made to introduce cash transfers for various schemes with the Unique Identification Number as a way to improve identification and prevent leakage of subsidy. Procurement at MSP. Allocation at Central Issue Price Distribution Sale of grains at Central Issue Price Context India s Public Distribution System (PDS) is the largest Distribution network of its kind in the world. PDS was introduced around World War II as a war-time rationing measure. Before the 1960s, Distribution through PDS was generally dependant on imports of food grains.

6 It was expanded in the 1960s as a response to the food shortages of the time; subsequently, the government set up the Agriculture Prices Commission and the Food Corporation of India to improve domestic procurement and storage of food grains for PDS. By the 1970s, PDS had evolved into a universal scheme for the Distribution of subsidised food. In the 1990s, the scheme was revamped to improve access of food grains to people in hilly and inaccessible areas, and to target the poor. Subsequently, in 1997, the government launched the Targeted Public Distribution System (TPDS), with a focus on the poor. TPDS aims to provide subsidised food and fuel to the poor through a network of ration shops. Food grains such as rice and wheat that are provided under TPDS are procured from farmers, allocated to states and delivered to the ration shop where the beneficiary buys his entitlement.

7 The centre and states share the responsibilities of identifying the poor, procuring grains and delivering food grains to beneficiaries. In September 2013, Parliament enacted the National Food Security Act, 2013. The Act relies largely on the existing TPDS to deliver food grains as legal entitlements to poor households. This marks a shift by making the right to food a justiciable right. In order to understand the implications of this Act, the note maps the food supply chain from the farmer to the beneficiary, identifies challenges to implementation of TPDS, and discusses alternatives to reform TPDS. It also details state-wise variations in the implementation of TPDS and discusses changes to the existing System by the Act. Laws and Regulations governing TPDS. PDS has evolved from the late 1930s into its current form. Table 1 traces the developments related to TPDS since its introduction and the various laws and regulations that govern its implementation.

8 Table 1: Timeline of PDS: 1930s to present Evolution of PDS Timeline Details PDS 1940s Launched as general entitlement scheme TPDS 1997 PDS was revamped to target poor households Antyodaya Anna Yojana 2000 Scheme launched to target the poorest of the poor . PDS Control Order 2001 Government notified this Order to administer TPDS. PUCL vs. Union of India 2001 Ongoing case in Supreme Court contending that right to food is a fundamental right National Food Security Act 2013 Act to provide legal right to food to the poor 2. Essential Commodities Act and PDS (Control) Order TPDS is administered under the Public Distribution System (Control) Order 2001,1 notified under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 (ECA).2 The ECA regulates the production, supply, and Distribution of essential commodities including edible oils, food crops such as wheat, rice, and sugar, among others.

9 It regulates prices, cultivation and Distribution of essential commodities. The PDS (Control) Order, 2001 specifies the framework for the implementation of TPDS. It highlights key aspects of the scheme including the method of identification of beneficiaries, the issue of food grains, and the mechanism for Distribution of food grains from the centre to states. PUCL vs. Union of India, 2001. In 2001, the People s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) filed a writ petition in the Supreme Court contending that the right to food is essential to the right to life as provided in Article 21 of the Constitution. During the ongoing litigation, the Court has issued several interim orders, including the implementation of eight central schemes as legal These include PDS, Antyodaya Anna Yojana (AAY), the Mid-Day Meal Scheme, and Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS).

10 In 2008, the Court ordered that Below Poverty Line (BPL) families be entitled to 35 kg of food grains per month at subsidised National Food Security Act, 2013. The National Food Security Act gives statutory backing to the TPDS. This legislation marks a shift in the right to food as a legal right rather than a general entitlement. The Act classifies the population into three categories: excluded ( , no entitlement), priority (entitlement), and Antyodaya Anna Yojana (AAY; higher entitlement). It establishes responsibilities for the centre and states and creates a grievance redressal mechanism to address non-delivery of entitlements. It is yet to be implemented. Identification of eligible households under existing TPDS. The government launched TPDS in order to target food grains entitlements to poor households. Therefore, identification and classification of beneficiaries is crucial to fulfil the goals of the scheme.