GESARA and NESARA and NO-SERA about 90% correct

1 GESARA and NESARA and NO-SERA about 90% correct By Anna Von Reitz I am sorry, but the real General Roy Schwasinger, who was a long-time friend of my Mother's and many of the other desperate Wisconsin dairy farmers who joined the NFO back in the 1970's, 80's and 90's, would turn over in his grave if he heard the claptrap now being spread about NESARA . And the so-called GESARA , the Global Government version would not be at all well-received, either. Please note that the writers of all these articles about NESARA never nail the name of the legislation down. Pay attention--- very close attention---to the words. Those who have read my articles about the Great Fraud which has been engulfing our nation and the entire world will be familiar with this con artist technique called "mirroring".

2 The perpetrators set up two (or more) deceptively similar names and confuse people deliberately. It works hand in hand with another con job technique called "Bait and Switch"---- you offer a superior product or deal, and at the last minute "switch" to a much lower grade product. The classic example is buying a Thoroughbred race horse named "Glory and Honor". and being shown a beautiful, high-spirited, young animal named "Glory n' Honour"--- only to sign on the dotted line and receive instead "Glory and Honor"---- a Thoroughbred race horse, all right, the Great-Great-Great-Grandsire of the horse you thought you were buying. First, you are confused by the deceptively similar names, and then second, you make natural, innocent----but wrong--- assumptions about the information you've been given, and third, acting upon those wrong assumptions you commit to buying something or supporting an action that brings unexpected and unfortunate results.

3 This is happening with NESARA , too. The anonymous writers of these Intel-Updates routinely talk about the "National Economic Security and Recovery Act" which Schwasinger pioneered, and in the same breath, they talk about the "National Economic Stability and Recovery Act"--- note the deceptively similar names? They talk up the great popular selling points of the actual, original NESARA . legislation and associate it with competent and honorable men like Schwasinger----- and then having garnered popular support for something called " NESARA "----- substitute and push through the ringer legislation which is also called " NESARA ". The same trick is being used to mask the actual Economic Stability Fund and confuse it with the deceptively named Economic Security Fund, both of which are abbreviated "ESF" so that it is impossible for anyone to know which fund the rats are talking about at any given moment, except from context.

4 The Economic Stability Fund was established to control the amount of various national and private currencies in circulation and keep the fiat money system in balance. The world's top bankers could determine, for example, that there were too many Yen in circulation (in their opinion anyway) and the Japanese economy was exploding due to a ready money supply. If this was not in line with their plans --- for example, to take over the Japanese auto manufacturing sector---they would simply use other currencies from the Economic Stability Fund to buy up large quantities of Yen on the world market and remove them from circulation. Reducing supply of a currency hedges it against inflation but it also puts a curb on the growth of the targeted national economy.

5 In this way, the bankers manipulated and controlled both money supplies and national economies at will. This Fund was created by agreement and collusion among the major central banks--- they simply printed up more or less of specific fiat currencies----and kept "pushing" and "pulling". currency supplies around using the Economic Stability Fund to do it. Imagine that you are a gardener and you have an array of fertilizers to choose from---- organic and inorganic, bone meal, fish meal, blood meal, phosphorus, potassium, calcium, and you can choose which sector of the garden gets fertilized and which does not, and which fertilizers are applied and in what amount. This is essentially the position that the major central bankers garnered for themselves---- the Economic Stability Fund has functioned as their fertilizer supply warehouse.

6 This is the "$800 trillion dollars" these yahoos are talking about that was supposedly discovered during a military audit of the Federal Reserve in the early 1990's. They neglect to tell you that this vast stockpile of currency was only denominated in "dollars"---- and that it is actually composed of all world currencies and that it has been used to manipulate the supply of all world currencies. It did not come from the "US Taxpayers". It came from printing presses and digital account ledgers controlled and manipulated by Central Banks and it represents the single largest counterfeiting and commodity market rigging scheme in world history. They also neglect to tell you why you are finally hearing about this and something is finally being done about it going on thirty years after the fact.

7 The Economic Security Fund is a different animal entirely, but also represents a vast asset fund compiled to secure the US Dollar and buffer it against outside manipulation of the kind just described. The focus of this Fund was not to manipulate world monetary supplies, per se, but to guarantee the position of the USD as a Reserve Currency. Advanced digital counterfeiting by foreign nations including Thailand, the Philippines, and China have effectively undermined the operations of these funds and the entire kingdom of paper created by the central banks. Those of you who have your thinking caps on should be asking yourselves some highly interesting questions right about now--- like, why is the military involved in any of this?

8 Why General Schwasinger? Why the Chief of Naval Operations? And if the military Top Brass has been aware of this criminality since the 1990's, why haven't they taken action to put an end to it? The short answer is that the military is at the root of the problem and since 1863. always has been. In that year, President Abraham Lincoln adopted the Lieber Code and issued General Order 100 as Commander-in-Chief. This placed the responsibility for our nation's future and for the security of our money in the hands of the Grand Army of the Republic and General Ulysses S. Grant----who was a tough soldier, a decent man, and didn't know diddly about international finance. The next day, Lincoln bankrupted the original United States (Trading Company) and relinquished his position as Chief Executive Officer.

9 He continued to function in the Office of Commander-in-Chief. Every United States President since then has executed his office by acting as the Commander-in-Chief. And the responsibility for protecting our money has remained with the military, too. The problem is that the military depends on the politicians for its own funding, a basic conflict of interest and powers. The present situation with General Dunford and the "treasury" in Reno and what they are calling the "New Republic" speaks volumes about this same conflict. The actual United States Treasury ceased to exist in 1924 and throughout my lifetime whatever United States Treasury there has been, equates with the International Monetary Fund. That's why the US Secretary of the Treasury is the head of the IMF Board of Governors.

10 The military has been charged with protecting our money, but our money has, at the same time, been used by the bankers and politicians to keep the military from actually doing its job. An uneasy see-saw of conflicted interests has been the result. On one hand, the military has held its mandate to protect the nation's money over the banker's heads, and on the other, it has been stuck begging for their own budget from politicians who are controlled by the bankers. Around and around it goes, with the military for the most part scowling and shuffling and letting the bankers and politicians do whatever they want, in exchange for ample defense budgets. That may be cruel to say and in a few cases of individuals who have fought the fight, like Roy Schwasinger, even unjust, but the proof is in the pudding overall---- and that proof shows that despite knowing about the criminality of the Central Bankers and the unauthorized usurpation of the members of Congress, our military has failed to take any truly effective and meaningful action and it remains to be seen whether they will do anything now.