Guidelines for conserving connectivity through ecological ...

1 Guidelines for conserving connectivity through ecological networks and corridorsBest Practice Protected Area Guidelines Series No. 30 Jodi Hilty, Graeme L. Worboys, Annika Keeley, Stephen Woodley, Barbara Lausche, Harvey Locke, Mark Carr, Ian Pulsford, James Pittock, J. Wilson White, David M. Theobald, Jessica Levine, Melly Reuling, James Watson, Rob Ament and Gary M. TaborCraig Groves, Series EditorDeveloping capacity for a protected planet IUCN WCPA s BEST PRACTICE PROTECTED AREA Guidelines SERIESIUCN-WCPA s Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines are the world s authoritative resource for protected area managers. Involving collaboration among specialist practitioners dedicated to supporting better implementation of ideas in the field, the Guidelines distil learning and advice drawn from across IUCN. Applied in the field, they build institutional and individual capacity to manage protected area systems effectively, equitably and sustainably, and to cope with the myriad of challenges faced in practice.

2 The Guidelines also assist national governments, protected area agencies, non-governmental organisations, communities and private sector partners in meeting their commitments and goals, and especially the Convention on Biological Diversity s Programme of Work on Protected full set of Guidelines is available at: resources are available at: Contribute to developing capacity for a Protected Planet at: PROTECTED AREA DEFINITION, MANAGEMENT CATEGORIES AND GOVERNANCE TYPESIUCN defines a protected area as: A clearly defined geographical space, recognised, dedicated and managed, through legal or other effective means, to achieve the long-term conservation of nature with associated ecosystem services and cultural definition is expanded by six management categories (one with a sub-division), summarized below. Ia Strict nature reserve: Strictly protected for biodiversity and also possibly geological/ geomorphological features, where human visitation, use and impacts are controlled and limited to ensure protection of the conservation Wilderness area: Usually large unmodified or slightly modified areas, retaining their natural character and influence, without permanent or significant human habitation, protected and managed to preserve their natural National park: Large natural or near-natural areas protecting large-scale ecological processes with characteristic species and ecosystems, which also have environmentally and culturally compatible spiritual, scientific, educational, recreational and visitor Natural monument or feature.

3 Areas set aside to protect a specific natural monument, which can be a landform, sea mount, marine cavern, geological feature such as a cave, or a living feature such as an ancient Habitat/species management area: Areas to protect particular species or habitats, where management reflects this priority. Many will need regular, active interventions to meet the needs of particular species or habitats, but this is not a requirement of the category. V Protected landscape or seascape: Where the interaction of people and nature over time has produced a distinct character with significant ecological , biological, cultural and scenic value: and where safeguarding the integrity of this interaction is vital to protecting and sustaining the area and its associated nature conservation and other Protected areas with sustainable use of natural resources: Areas which conserve ecosystems, together with associated cultural values and traditional natural resource management systems.

4 Generally large, mainly in a natural condition, with a proportion under sustainable natural resource management and where low-level non-industrial natural resource use compatible with nature conservation is seen as one of the main category should be based around the primary management objective(s), which should apply to at least three-quarters of the protected area the 75 per cent management categories are applied with a typology of governance types a description of who holds authority and responsibility for the protected area. IUCN defines four governance A. Governance by government: Federal or national ministry/agency in charge; sub-national ministry or agency in charge ( at regional, provincial, municipal level); government-delegated management ( to NGO).Type B. Shared governance: Trans-boundary governance (formal and informal arrangements between two or more countries); collaborative governance ( through various ways in which diverse actors and institutions work together); joint governance (pluralist board or other multi-party governing body).

5 Type C. Private governance: Conserved areas established and run by individual landowners; non-profit organisations ( NGOs, universities) and for-profit organisations ( corporate landowners).Type D. Governance by Indigenous peoples and local communities: Indigenous peoples conserved areas and territories - established and run by Indigenous peoples; community conserved areas established and run by local more information on the IUCN definition, categories and governance types see Dudley (2008). Guidelines for applyingprotected area management categories, which can be downloaded at: more on governance types, see Borrini-Feyerabend, et al., (2013). Governance of Protected Areas: From understanding to action, which can be downloaded at for conserving connectivity through ecological networks and corridorsInternational Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN)IUCN is a membership Union uniquely composed of both government and civil society organisations.

6 It provides public, private and non-governmental organisations with the knowledge and tools that enable human progress, economic development and nature conservation to take place in 1948, IUCN is now the world s largest and most diverse environmental network, harnessing the knowledge, resources and reach of more than 1,400 Member organisations and some 15,000 experts. It is a leading provider of conservation data, assessments and analysis. Its broad membership enables IUCN to fill the role of incubator and trusted repository of best practices, tools and international provides a neutral space in which diverse stakeholders including governments, NGOs, scientists, businesses, local communities, indigenous peoples organisations and others can work together to forge and implement solutions to environmental challenges and achieve sustainable with many partners and supporters, IUCN implements a large and diverse portfolio of conservation projects worldwide.

7 Combining the latest science with the traditional knowledge of local communities, these projects work to reverse habitat loss, restore ecosystems and improve people s World Commission on Protected Areas (WCPA)IUCN s World Commission on Protected Areas (WCPA) is the world s premier network of protected area expertise. It is administered by IUCN Programme on Protected Areas and has more than 2,500 members, spanning 140 countries. WCPA is one of IUCN s six voluntary Commissions and its mission is to promote the establishment and effective management of a worldwide representative network of terrestrial and marine protected areas, as an integral contribution to the IUCN mission. WCPA works by helping governments and others plan protected areas and integrate them into all sectors, providing strategic advice to policy makers and practitioners to help strengthen capacity and investment in protected areas, and convening the diverse constituency of protected area stakeholders to address challenging issues.

8 For more than 60 years, IUCN and WCPA have been at the forefront of global action on protected on Biological Diversity (CBD)Opened for signature at the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro in 1992, and entered into force in December 1993, the Convention on Biological Diversity is an international treaty for the conservation of biodiversity, the sustainable use of the components of biodiversity and the equitable sharing of the benefits derived from the use of genetic resources. With 196 Parties so far, the Convention has near universal participation among connectivity Conservation Specialist Group (CCSG)CCSG was established in 2016 under the IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas (WCPA) to support information sharing, active participation, global awareness, and action to maintain, enhance, and restore ecological connectivity conservation around the world. Its objective is to advance the science, policy, and practice at international, national, and subnational levels to meet the growing demand for solutions that advance the identification, recognition, and implementation of consistent connectivity conservation measures.

9 For Large Landscape Conservation (CLLC)CLLC develops solutions, implements projects and contributes to global efforts that connect and protect crucial habitat across terrestrial, marine and freshwater ecosystems. It provides expertise through four key focus areas: science and research, mentorship and networking, community resilience and policy. By bringing knowledge and experience to bear on connectivity conservation issues worldwide, the Center works with communities, governments and other stakeholders to stop fragmentation and safeguard the legacy of protected and conserved areas by making them part of larger ecological networks for conservation. to Yukon Conservation Initiative (Y2Y)Y2Y connects and protects habitat in North America spanning the Yellowstone to Yukon ecosystems so people and nature can thrive. It highlights and focuses on local issues that have implications for the region as a whole, and works to set the context for regional conservation work by providing the vision for a healthy Yellowstone to Yukon.

10 Working across an area covering over 3,200 square kilometres, Y2Y engages partners across jurisdictions to knit together an interconnected system of wild lands and waters that harmonizes the needs of people and for conserving connectivity through ecological networks and corridorsJodi Hilty, Graeme L. Worboys, Annika Keeley, Stephen Woodley, Barbara Lausche, Harvey Locke, Mark Carr, Ian Pulsford, James Pittock, J. Wilson White, David M. Theobald, Jessica Levine, Melly Reuling, James Watson, Rob Ament and Gary M. TaborCraig Groves, Series EditorThe designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN or other participating organisations, concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN or other participating is pleased to acknowledge the support of its Framework Partners who provide core funding: Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland; Government of France and the French Development Agency (AFD); the Ministry of Environment, Republic of Korea; the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (Norad); the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida).