Example: confidence

Hazard and Vulnerability Analysis Hazard and Vulnerability ...

Hazard and Vulnerability AnalysisHazard and Vulnerability AnalysisThis document is a sample Hazard Vulnerability Analysis tool. It is not aIssues to consider for preparedness include, but are not limited to:substitute for a comprehensive emergency preparedness program. Individuals or 1 Status of current plansorganizations using this tool are solely responsible for any Hazard assessment and 2 Frequency of drillscompliance with applicable laws and Training status4 InsuranceINSTRUCTIONS:5 Availability of alternate sources for critical supplies/servicesEvaluate potential for event and response among the following categories usingthe Hazard specific scale. Assume each event incident occurs at the worst Issues to consider for internal resources include, but are not limited to:possible time ( during peak patient loads).1 Types of supplies on hand/will they meet need?2 Volume of supplies on hand/will they meet need?

Hazard and Vulnerability Analysis Hazard and Vulnerability Analysis This document is a sample Hazard Vulnerability Analysis tool. It is not a Issues to consider for preparedness include, but are not limited to: substitute for a comprehensive emergency preparedness program.

Tags:

  Vulnerability, Hazards, Hazard vulnerability

Information

Domain:

Source:

Link to this page:

Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:

Other abuse

Advertisement

Transcription of Hazard and Vulnerability Analysis Hazard and Vulnerability ...

1 Hazard and Vulnerability AnalysisHazard and Vulnerability AnalysisThis document is a sample Hazard Vulnerability Analysis tool. It is not aIssues to consider for preparedness include, but are not limited to:substitute for a comprehensive emergency preparedness program. Individuals or 1 Status of current plansorganizations using this tool are solely responsible for any Hazard assessment and 2 Frequency of drillscompliance with applicable laws and Training status4 InsuranceINSTRUCTIONS:5 Availability of alternate sources for critical supplies/servicesEvaluate potential for event and response among the following categories usingthe Hazard specific scale. Assume each event incident occurs at the worst Issues to consider for internal resources include, but are not limited to:possible time ( during peak patient loads).1 Types of supplies on hand/will they meet need?2 Volume of supplies on hand/will they meet need?

2 Please note specific score criteria on each work sheet to ensure accurate Staff availability & training4 Coordination with MOB'sIssues to consider for probability include, but are not limited to:5 Availability of back-up systems1 Known risk6 Internal resources ability to withstand disasters/survivability2 Historical data3 Manufacturer/vendor statisticsIssues to consider for external resources include, but are not limited to:4 Subjective evaluation/best estimate1 Types of agreements with community agencies/drills?5 Local Emergency Planning Committee input2 Coordination with local and state agencies3 Coordination with proximal health care facilitiesIssues to consider for response include, but are not limited to:4 Coordination with treatment specific facilities1 Time to marshal an on-scene response5 City/County EMS services capabilities2 Scope of response capability/staff training6 Community volunteers/training3 On site support resources/supplies7 Vendor Pre-incident response plans/contracts4 Estimated severity & duration of the incident8 Other community resources5 Historical evaluation of response success6 Local Emergency Planning Committee inputIssues to consider for human impact include, but are not limited to:Complete all worksheets including Natural, Technological, Human and Hazmat.

3 1 Potential for staff death or injuryThe summary section will automatically provide your specific and overall relative Potential for patient/visitor death or injury3 Emotional/psychological impact4 Local cultural normsIssues to consider for property impact include, but are not limited to:Notes:1 Cost to replacea. Plan not yet developed2 Cost to set up temporary replacementb. Plan approved3 Cost to repairc. Training program developed4 Time to recoverd. Support materials not on hande. Support materials on handIssues to consider for business impact include, but are not limited to:f. Staff trained1 Business interruptiong. Drill/Exercise conducted2 Employees unable to report to workh. Goals Not Met3 Customers unable to reach facilityi. Goals Met 4 Company in violation of contractual agreements /P = Partial5 Company in violation of regulatory standards6 Imposition of fines and penalties or legal costsNote.

4 7 Interruption of critical suppliesCoordinated with City of Santa Clarita, Emergency Preparedness Coordinator - 2/05/20048 Interruption of product distributionCoordinated with LA County Sheriff, Emergency Preparedness Coordinator9 Reputation and public imageCoordinated with LA Fire Department, HazMat Emergency Preparedness Coordinator10 Financial AND Vulnerability ASSESSMENT TOOLNATURALLY OCCURRING EVENTSSEVERITY = (MAGNITUDE - MITIGATION)EVENTPROBABILITYHUMAN IMPACTPROPERTY IMPACTBUSINESS IMPACTPREPARED-NESSINTERNAL RESPONSEEXTERNAL RESPONSERISKL ikelihood this will occurPossibility of death or injuryPhysical losses and damagesInterruption of servicesPreplanningTime, effectiveness, resourcesCommunity/ Mutual Aid staff and suppliesRelative threat*SCORE 0 = N/A 1 = Low 2 = Moderate 3 = High 0 = N/A 1 = Low 2 = Moderate 3 = High 0 = N/A 1 = Low 2 = Moderate 3 = High 0 = N/A 1 = Low 2 = Moderate 3 = High 0 = N/A 1 = High 2 = Moderate 3 = Low or none0 = N/A 1 = High 2 = Moderate 3 = Low or none0 = N/A 1 = High 2 = Moderate 3 = Low or none0 - 100%Blizzard02232230%Drought122222222%Du st/Sand Storm112133324%Earthquake, >6 Local333333294%Epidemic/Natural232333259 %Flood, Local233333263%Hurricane00000000%Ice Storm132333331%Infectious Disease (SARS, etc.)

5 133333231%Landslide112233224%Severe Thunderstorm111122217%Snow/Ice/Hail Storm222233356%Temperature Extremes111122217%Tsunami - Tidal Wave00000000%Tornado00000000%Volcano0000 0000%Wild Fire232333259%AVERAGE *Threat increases with percentage.* Events in Bold have occurred previously18 RISK = PROBABILITY * hazards : Hazard AND Vulnerability ASSESSMENT TOOLTECHNOLOGIC EVENTSSEVERITY = (MAGNITUDE - MITIGATION)EVENTPROBABILITYHUMAN IMPACTPROPERTY IMPACTBUSINESS IMPACTPREPARED-NESSINTERNAL RESPONSEEXTERNAL RESPONSERISKN otesLikelihood this will occurPossibility of death or injuryPhysical losses and damagesInterruption of servicesPreplanningTime, effectiveness, resourcesCommunity/ Mutual Aid staff and suppliesRelative threat*SCORE 0 = N/A 1 = Low 2 = Moderate 3 = High 0 = N/A 1 = Low 2 = Moderate 3 = High 0 = N/A 1 = Low 2 = Moderate 3 = High 0 = N/A 1 = Low 2 = Moderate 3 = High 0 = N/A 1 = High 2 = Moderate 3 = Low or none0 = N/A 1 = High 2 = Moderate 3 = Low or none0 = N/A 1 = High 2 = Moderate 3 = Low or none0 - 100%CommunityAir Plane Crash.

6 Commercial132322124%Biological Incident132333230%Chemical Incident222333359%Dam/Levee Failure133333231%Dirty Bomb133333231%Electrical Service Failure - Commercial321211144%Explosion122222120%F ire -Large133333231%Natural Gas Loss132332228%Phone/Data Service211211126%Radiological Incident 233333263%Sewer System Loss112222119%Strike/Transportation11111 1111%Water Contamination132322226%Water Loss - City233322152%Train Derailment222222244%InternalBiological/I nfection Control331213267%Communications Systems Failure111222117%Chemical Spill or Release222233148%Commerical Power Failure311111239%Data System Failure311111133%Electrical Distribution Failure - Internal222222141%Emergency Alarms - Not Clearly Heard in all areas322233172%Evacuation Route Hazards311223261%Facility Design/ Construction Hazards211122130%Fire Alarm Failure133322126%Fire, Internal133322126%Fire WatchFlood, Internal233333159%Fuel Shortage133333130%Generator Failure133333130%Hazmat Exposure, Internal221333148%HVAC Failure121222220%Information Systems Failure311222150%Medical Gas Failure231323356%Medical Vacuum Failure221223244%Mold/Mildew Growth322222372%Natural Gas Failure111222219%Radiological Incident111133119%Sewer Failure102233120%Sick Building Syndrome122222120%Steam Failure111122115%Storage of Combustibles212222137%Structural Damage111221115%Supply Shortage221322141%Transportation Failure111122115%Water Delivery System Failure331222161%AVERAGE *Threat increases with percentage.

7 * Events in Bold have occurred previously* Identify nearby sites & hazards where an off site spill/release could put the hospital within the chemical/radiological plume78 RISK = PROBABILITY * hazards : Hazard AND Vulnerability ASSESSMENT TOOLHUMAN RELATED EVENTSSEVERITY = (MAGNITUDE - MITIGATION)EVENTPROBABILITYHUMAN IMPACTPROPERTY IMPACTBUSINESS IMPACTPREPARED-NESSINTERNAL RESPONSEEXTERNAL RESPONSERISKN otesLikelihood this will occurPossibility of death or injuryPhysical losses and damagesInterruption of servicesPreplanningTime, effectiveness, resourcesCommunity/ Mutual Aid staff and suppliesRelative threat*SCORE 0 = N/A 1 = Low 2 = Moderate 3 = High 0 = N/A 1 = Low 2 = Moderate 3 = High 0 = N/A 1 = Low 2 = Moderate 3 = High 0 = N/A 1 = Low 2 = Moderate 3 = High 0 = N/A 1 = High 2 = Moderate 3 = Low or none0 = N/A 1 = High 2 = Moderate 3 = Low or none0 = N/A 1 = High 2 = Moderate 3 = Low or none0 - 100%Addolesent Kindnap130322120%Assultave Behavior320122144%Assultave Behavior w/Weapon131133122%Bomb Threat311132150%Bomb Explosion.

8 Internal133333231%Civil Disturbance111122217%Dirty Bomb 133333333%Employee Abduction130133120%Facility Lock Down213333256%Forensic Admission310022133%Hostage Situation131333126%Infant Abduction111322220%Labor Action, Internal121333226%Labor Action, External10011117%Mass Evacuation LA Area131233328%Mass Casualty Incident (medical/infectious)221332248%Mass Casualty Incident (trauma)121333226%Search & Rescue122233124%VIP Situation10012209%Workplace Violence - Other111322119%AVERAGE *Threat increases with percentage.* Events in Bold have occurred previously18 RISK = PROBABILITY * hazards : Hazard AND Vulnerability ASSESSMENT TOOLHAZARDOUS MATERIALS EVENTSSEVERITY = (MAGNITUDE - MITIGATION)EVENTPROBABILITYHUMAN IMPACTPROPERTY IMPACTBUSINESS IMPACTPREPARED-NESSINTERNAL RESPONSEEXTERNAL RESPONSERISKN otesLikelihood this will occurPossibility of death or injuryPhysical losses and damagesInterruption of servicesPreplanningTime, effectiveness.

9 ResourcesCommunity/ Mutual Aid staff and suppliesRelative threat*SCORE 0 = N/A 1 = Low 2 = Moderate 3 = High 0 = N/A 1 = Low 2 = Moderate 3 = High 0 = N/A 1 = Low 2 = Moderate 3 = High 0 = N/A 1 = Low 2 = Moderate 3 = High 0 = N/A 1 = High 2 = Moderate 3 = Low or none0 = N/A 1 = High 2 = Moderate 3 = Low or none0 = N/A 1 = High 2 = Moderate 3 = Low or none0 - 100%Chemical Exposure, /Cloud From External Source (Fwy, Rail, Plant, etc)232 333 259%Hazmat Incident Mass Casualty (From historic events at your MC with >= 5 victims)131 333 126%Hazmat Incident Small Size (From historic events at your MC with < 5 victims)111 123 219%Large Internal Spill or Release122 133 122%Radiologic Exposure, External111 122 217%Radiologic Exposure, Internal 101 122 215%Shelter in Place112 333 226%Small-Medium Sized Internal Spill212 233 144%Terrorism, Biological131 333 126%Terrorism, Blast120 333 224%Terrorism, Chemical132 333 230%Terrorism, Radiologic111 233 222%AVERAGE *Threat increases with percentage.

10 * Events in Bold have occurred previously12 RISK = PROBABILITY * Materials : SUMMARY OF MEDICAL CENTER hazards ANALYSISN aturalTechnologicalHumanHazmatTotal for Specific Relative Risk: document is a sample Hazard Vulnerability Analysis tool. It is not a substitute for a comprehensive emergency preparedness program. Individuals or organizations using this tool are solely responsible for any Hazard assessment and compliance with applicable laws and to Notes:a. Plan not yet developedb. Plan approvedc. Training program developedd. Support materials not on hande. Support materials on handf. Staff trainedg. Drill/Exercise conductedh. Goals Not Meti. Goals Met /P = Partialx. No Hazard specific response will be developed at this timeBased upon a review of the above assessment by the Emergency Preparedness Committee, Safety Committee andAdministration the following vulnerabilities have been identified for improvement during this goal measured by:Projected Date:1.


Related search queries