Example: air traffic controller

Introductory Study Guide for Mere Christianity

Look for Christ, and you will find Him, and with him everything else thrown in. Introductory Study Guide for mere Christianity Created by: Liz Evershed, Lewis Foundation Intern 2000-01. Introduction mere Christianity is possibly Lewis' most frequently read work, and was originally given as a series of broadcast talks during the Second World War. Of his own qualification to speak on Christianity he said: It's not because I'm anybody in particular that I've been asked to tell you what Christians believe. In fact it's just the opposite. [The British Broadcasting Corporation] have asked me, first of all because I'm a layman and not a parson, and consequently they thought I might understand the ordinary person's point of view a bit better. Secondly, I think they asked me because it was known that I'd been an atheist for many years and only became a Christian fairly recently. They thought that would mean I'd be able to see the difficulties able to remember what Christianity looks like from the outside.

Look for Christ, and you will find Him, and with him everything else thrown in. © C.S.Lewis Foundation 2001 1 Introductory Study Guide for Mere Christianity Created ...

Tags:

  Guide, Christianity, Introductory, Mere christianity, Mere

Information

Domain:

Source:

Link to this page:

Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:

Other abuse

Transcription of Introductory Study Guide for Mere Christianity

1 Look for Christ, and you will find Him, and with him everything else thrown in. Introductory Study Guide for mere Christianity Created by: Liz Evershed, Lewis Foundation Intern 2000-01. Introduction mere Christianity is possibly Lewis' most frequently read work, and was originally given as a series of broadcast talks during the Second World War. Of his own qualification to speak on Christianity he said: It's not because I'm anybody in particular that I've been asked to tell you what Christians believe. In fact it's just the opposite. [The British Broadcasting Corporation] have asked me, first of all because I'm a layman and not a parson, and consequently they thought I might understand the ordinary person's point of view a bit better. Secondly, I think they asked me because it was known that I'd been an atheist for many years and only became a Christian fairly recently. They thought that would mean I'd be able to see the difficulties able to remember what Christianity looks like from the outside.

2 So you see the long and the short of it is that I've been selected for this job just because I'm an amateur and not a professional, and a beginner not an old hand. Of course this means that you may well ask what right I have to talk on the subject at all. Well, when I'd finished my scripts I sent them round to various people who were professionals: to one Church of England theologian, one Roman Catholic, one Presbyterian, and one Methodist. The Church of England man and the Presbyterian agreed with the whole thing. The Roman Catholic and the Methodist agreed in the main, but would have liked one or two places altered. So there you've got all the cards on the table. What I'm going to say isn't exactly what all these people would say;. but the greater part of it is what all Christians agree on One thing I can promise you. In spite of all the unfortunate differences between Christians, what they agree on is still something pretty big and pretty solid: big enough to blow any of us sky-high if it happens to be true.

3 Lewis' ability to get to the heart of Christian doctrine in this way was one of his greatest gifts, and helped to inspire a greater sense of solidarity amongst churchmen of many persuasions. As far as the world at large was concerned, the level of public response to Lewis' talks was considerable, and divided, more often then not, into warm appreciation or vehement criticism. In a letter to Eric Fenn of the BBC Lewis expressed no surprise at this great divergence of opinion: The two views you report aren't very illuminating about me perhaps;. about my subject matter, it is an old story isn't it? They love, or hate. Quotes taken from Walter Hooper's : A Companion and Guide . Foundation 2001 1. Look for Christ, and you will find Him, and with him everything else thrown in. Background The emphasis on moral law was especially important to Lewis because it seemed to him that: the New Testament, by preaching repentance and forgiveness, always assumes an audience who already believe in the law of Nature and know they have disobeyed it.

4 In modern England we cannot at present assume this, and therefore most apologetic begins a stage too far on. The first step is to create, or recover, the sense of guilt. Modern man in doubting the reality even of good and evil, had cut himself off from his ancestors (with the age-old notion of the Tao, or Law of Human Nature) and the whole bedrock of Christian thought that related to it. Those interested in learning more about the idea of the Tao can find practical examples of it at work in different cultures in the appendix to Lewis' The Abolition of Man . If you want to learn more about this concept in the history of Christian thought you can also look at Thomas Aquinas' Summa Theologica, a work that Lewis almost certainly drew on for help with his definitions. In the Summa Natural Law is defined as humans' willed participation in the Eternal Law of God, by using reason to discern fundamental goods and evils.

5 Suggestions The Study Guide we have provided has been gauged towards a certain set of needs. Some of the questions deal with unearthing the particularities of Lewis' arguments, but most seek to spark debate within the group as to how far people agree with Lewis' ideas, and how we might apply his insights to our lives today. We have endeavored to provide at least one question per chapter for books 1 and 2. Books 3 and 4 furnished more material for discussion because they were almost twice as long. In view of this it might be a good plan to divide your Study into three sessions starting with books 1 and 2 together and then books 3 and 4 separately. Once again, we suggest that you pick and choose questions according to your group interests and time constraints, and have someone moderate the discussion to ensure that everyone who wishes to has a chance to participate. Questions Book 1. (1) There has been a great deal of soft soap talked about God for the last hundred years.

6 That is not what I am offering. What, in your opinion, is Lewis offering us in mere Christianity ? (2) Do you agree with Lewis that we can all appeal to an objective sense of what is right and wrong a God-given conception of the Moral Law? (3) How is the Law of Human Nature/Moral Law distinguished from other laws? (4) In our postmodern society, many argue that morality is relative to culture and upbringing. How might you answer them, with Lewis' arguments in mind? (5) What does Lewis say about the limitations of: (a) Science (b) Psychoanalysis Foundation 2001 2. Look for Christ, and you will find Him, and with him everything else thrown in. Why, in his view, do neither of them pose a real challenge to belief in God? Do you agree with him that there is no conflict? (6) According to Lewis, Christianity only begins to make sense when we have realized a few hard facts about the kind of universe we live in.

7 What, in his view, are the illusions that people have to give up before Christianity can begin to speak to them? Can you think of any other illusions people might have to dismantle before coming to God? Book 2. (7) Lewis raises a number of opposing belief systems to Christianity (Atheism, Pantheism, Dualism) and attempts to show why none of them fit the facts. Do you agree with his arguments here? Would you have anything to add to them? (8) Is there anything surprising in Lewis' description of atheism as too simple ? (9) Do you think Christianity and water is a prevalent phenomenon? In what other ways might people attempt to water down the faith? (10) What did you make of Lewis' analogy of Christians as living in enemy territory ? Is this a biblical principle? In what other ways might the analogy be applicable to our lives? (11) Do you think Lewis' distinctive style of writing reinforces his argument for Christianity ?

8 (12) out of that hopeless attempt [to be their own masters, and invent some sort of happiness for themselves outside God] has come nearly all that which we call human history. Do you agree with this summation of world history? Would you have anything to add to it? (13) According to Lewis, God's rescue plan for humanity took the form of four things (the Moral Law, good dreams of a dying god, the revelation given to the Jews, and finally the coming of Jesus). (a) Is good dreams a strange inclusion in this list? (b) Can you think of any examples of good dreams in pagan/heathen cultures? (c) Why was the Judaic revelation so important? (d) Are there any other ways in which God could be said to have revealed himself to humanity? (14) If you are a Christian, you are free to think that all these religions, even the queerest ones, contain at least some hint of truth. Can you identify any hints of the truth within other world religions?

9 What do you think our attitude towards people of other faiths should be? (15) Despite Lewis famous words about the foolishness of accepting Christ simply as a great moral teacher it seems that many people today still take that attitude towards Jesus. Why? (16) What did you make of the theory of atonement that Lewis proposes? Are there any other such theories that have helped you in your understanding of what happened on the cross? Book 3. Foundation 2001 3. Look for Christ, and you will find Him, and with him everything else thrown in. (17) People often ask when the next step in evolution the step to something beyond man will happen. But on the Christian view it has happened already. How? (18) What, according to Lewis, are the three things that spread the Christ life to us? How might this work in practice? (19) Christian writers seem to be so strict at one moment and so very free and easy at another.

10 They talk about mere sins of thought as if they were immensely important: and then they talk about the most frightful murders and treacheries as if you had only got to repent and all would be forgiven. But I have come to see that they are right. What they are always thinking of is the mark which the action leaves on that tiny central self which no one sees in this life but which each of us will have to endure or enjoy forever. Do you think Lewis is right to put so much emphasis on our inner lives? What are the consequences of this view? (20) Do you agree that our sexual instinct has gone wrong? (21) What did you make of Lewis' model of Christian marriage? (22) Loving my enemies does not apparently mean thinking them nice. What does it mean then? (23) Do you agree with Lewis that an honest pacifist is mistaken? (24) The essential vice, the utmost evil, is pride. Why? (25) How do we recognize pride in: (a) others (b) ourselves What should our reaction be?


Related search queries