IS 10430 (2000): Criteria for Design of Lined Canals and ...

1 Disclosure to Promote the Right To InformationWhereas the Parliament of India has set out to provide a practical regime of right to information for citizens to secure access to information under the control of public authorities, in order to promote transparency and accountability in the working of every public authority, and whereas the attached publication of the Bureau of Indian Standards is of particular interest to the public, particularly disadvantaged communities and those engaged in the pursuit of education and knowledge, the attached public safety standard is made available to promote the timely dissemination of this information in an accurate manner to the public. ! $ ' + - Satyanarayan Gangaram Pitroda Invent a New India Using Knowledge 0 1 ' 5 Jawaharlal Nehru Step Out From the Old to the New 1 + , 1 + Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan The Right to Information, The Right to Live !

2 > 0 B Bhart hari N ti atakam Knowledge is such a treasure which cannot be stolen Invent a New India Using Knowledge IS 10430 (2000): Criteria for Design of Lined Canals andGuidance for Selection of Type of Lining [WRD 13: Canalsand Cross Drainage Works]REAFFIRMED2009IS10430:200031 R~~Cf>1~~l1ftf~0'S"ij~31 R~~~~~~(qfJ01~[ffUT)IndianStandardCRITER IAFORDESIGNOFLINEDCANALSANDGUIDANCEFORSE LECTIONOFTYPEOFLINING(FirstRevision) BIS 2000 BUREAUOFINDIANSTANDARDSMANAKBHAVAN, 9 BAHADURSHAHZAFARMARGNEWDELHI110002 October2000 PriceGroup6 AMENDMENTNO. 1 AUGUST 2005 TOIS10430:2000 CRITERIAFORDESIGN OFLINED Canals AND GUIDANCEFORSELECTIONOFTYPEOFLINING(FU'st Revision)[Page1,clause3(r)]- Substitute the following for the existing:'r)Availability of suitableconstructionmaterialwithineconom icleads,such as:1)Cementof requisitequality;2)Buildinglime of requisiteclass;3) Flyash for use aspozzolana;4)Suitable clay formanufactureofcalcinedclaypozzolana;5) Coarse and fineaggregates;6)Soil of suitable quality formanufactureofbumtclaytiles/bricks;7)P ulverizedfuelash-limeand/or clay flyashbuildingbricks;and8)Stones ofrequiredsize andquality.]

3 'IPage3,clause6(a)]-Substitute the following for the existing:'a)RigidLining1)Stone-pitchedli ning;2)Burnt clay tile orbricklining;3)Burntbricks orpulverizedfuelash-limebricksorburntcla yflyashbuildingbricks lining;4)Precastcementconcrete/stoneslab lining;5)Cementconcrete tilelining;6)In situcement/limeconcretelining,7)Stonemas onrylining;8)Soilcement/soilcementand flyashlining;9)Shotcretelining;10)Ferroc ementlining,and11) Asphaltic cement concrete IS10430:2000[Page4,clause6(b)(l)]-Substi tute the following for the existing:1) Geomembrane likeHighDensity Polyethylene (HOPE), Polvinylchloride (pVC), Low Density. Polyethylene (LDPE) with covercomprising layer of bentonite with adequate earth/bumt clay tile brickor pulverized fuel ash-lime brick or burnt clay flyash buildingbrick/precast cement concrete.

4 '(WRD13)ReprographyUnit, BlS,NewDelhi, India2 Irrigation Canals and Canal Linings Sectional Committee, WRD 13 FOREWORDThis Indian Standard (First Revision) was adopted by the Bureau of Indian Standards, after the draft finalizedby the Irrigation Canals and Canals Linings Sectional Committee had been approved by the WaterResourcesDivision of Canals is animportantfeature of irrigation projects as it improves the flowcharacteristicsandminimises the loss of water due to seepage. The water thus saved can be utilised for the extension and improvementof irrigation. Lining of water courses in the areas irrigated by tubewells assumes special significance as thepumped water supply is relatively more costly. The reduced seepage also prevents rise of the sub-soil watertable and thus reduces the possibility of damage to the adjoining areas by water logging.

5 Further, due toadoption of highervelocitiesin a Lined canal there is a saving in the cross-sectional area of the canal and landwidth required, withcorrespondingsaving in the cost of excavation and masonry works. It helps inretentionof shape of the canal. Lining also results inimprovementofcommandand larger working head standard deals with Design of Lined Canals . However, before lining of a canal is decided,techno-economicjustificationfor the same should be established. Selection of a particular type of lining should be arrived atbased on materials available and overall costvis-a-vissaving in seepage and forvarious types of lining shall becollectedand consulted before deciding on aparticulartype of generalguidelineswith regard to factors influencing the selection of the type of lining are given in thisstandard, for the assistance of the designer.

6 But each project should be individually analysed taking intoconsiderationits peculiar standard was first published in 1982. The first revision has been taken up in the light of thecommentsreceived from the Irrigationdepartmentsof various states. In this revision functions of lining and various typesof lining have been included. Changes in side slopes, free board, etc, have also been is no ISO standard on the subject. This standard has been prepared based on indigenousmanufacturers'data/practicesin the field in the purpose of deciding whether a particularrequirementof this standard is complied with, the final value,observed or calculated,expressingthe result of a test or analysis, shall be rounded off in accordance withIS2:1960'Rulesfor rounding off numerical values(revised)'.

7 The number of significant places retained in theroundedoffvalue should be the same as that of the specified value in this standard. IS10430:2000 IndianStandardCRITERIAFORDESIGNOFLINEDCA NALSANDGUIDANCEFORSELECTIONOFTYPEOFLININ G(FirstRevision)2 REFERENCES1 SCOPE3 NECESSARYINFORMATIONThis standard lays down Design Criteria for Lined canalsandpresentsguidelinesfor selection of type of other localconditions;Thicknessof iceformation(ifapplicable);Availability ofsuitableconstructionmaterialswithineco nomicleads, such as:k) Availability of skilled andunskilledlabour;m) Availability ofconstructionmachinery;n) Cattle traffic;p)q)r)I)Coarseand fineaggregatefor canal lining;2) Soil for makingtiles/bricks;and3) Stones ofrequiredsize,specificgravity andsoundnessfor stone )Cross-sectionsalongthecanalalignmentani ntervalsnot more than300m for auniformterrainand atcloserintervalsforundulatingterrain.

8 Thecross-sectionsshould extend at least10 metresbeyondthe limits of canalsectiononboth sides;e)Road andrailwaycrossings,cart/pedestriantrack s,drainagecrossings,etc;t)Natureandquant ityofsedimentlikely to betransported;g)Profileof soil up to at least half the full supplydepth or I mwhicheveris more, below the canalbed level along the canalalignmentat 500 mintervals. However, if anyvariationin soilstratais found, the spacing shall be at shorter usual soilpropertiesincludingpermeability,swel lingpressures,anddispersiveproperties;h) Saltcontentof the soil,speciallypresenceofsulphates,to bedeterminedat suitableintervals;j)Sub-soilwater level and its quality along thecanalalignment;TitleCode ofpracticeforunderdrainageof Lined Canals (secondrevision)Guidelinesforlinin gofcanalsIIIexpansivesoils(secondrevisio n)-IS : 19959451 : 1994 NOTE -Suitable transmission loss ( mvs per millionsquaremetreofwettedperimeter)for linedcanaldependingupon the type of lining,climaticcondi-tions shall be asuitabledesign of a Lined canal andforselectionof type of lining thefollowinginfor-mation isnecessaryfor the entire length of the canal:a)Capacity-Capacityrequiredfor the canal toirrigatethecommanddependson thecroppattern,irrigationintensity,rotat ionperiod,waterrequiredduringcriticalper iod,trans-mission losses, etc.

9 For fixing the canal capacity,a designstatement,or capacitystatementshouldbeseparatelyprepa red,reach aparticularreach should bedesignedfor themaximumdischargein that ,constituteprovisionsof the time ofpublicationtheeditionsindicatedwere valid. Allstandardsaresubjectto revision and parties toagreementsbased onthisstandardareencouragedtoinvestigate thepossibilityofapplyingthe most recenteditionsof thestandardsindicatedbelow:b)Longitudina l-sectionalong the canalalignmentplottedgenerallyto ahorizontalscale of I in10000and a vertical scale of I in 100. Verticalscalemay bechanged,ifdesired,dependingupon the drop in the ground levels;c)Full supply level (FSL), bank level and the bedlevel of theparentcanal (if any);4 lining ure:a)Seepagecontrol,b)Preventionof waterlogging,c)Increasedhydraulicefficie ncy,d)Increasedresistancetoerosion/abrai son, is10430:2000e)Reductionincross-sectionar ea andconsequentialsmallerstructures,andJ) ValuesofRugosityCoefficient(n)forLinedCa nalswithStraightAlignment( ) (3)Value of'II' bed with side slopecharacteristicsas given below:a)Formedconcreteh)Random rubble inmortarc)Dry rubble(rip-rap)NOTES1 For Canals with analignmentother than the straight.

10 Asmallincreasein thevalueof"n'may bemadeoralternatively bend losses may be accounted for. In caseofcanalswithrelativelyhigherdischarg esinstraightreaches, lower values of'n'indicatedmay The'n'value shall be decided in view of the age oflining, surface roughness, weed growth, channel , silting,suspendedmaterial andbed load. )v )Concretebedtrowel/floatfinishand slopesasindicated below:a)Hammerdressed stonemasonryb)Coursedrubblemasonryc)Rand omrubblemasonryd)Masonryplasterede)Stone pitchedlininga)Formed, no finish/PCC tilesor slabsb) Trowel float finishc)Guni ted finishiv)Asphalta)Smoothb)Roughii)Brick/ tileliningiii) )Concrete with surfaceasindicatedbelow:SI (I)(2) canalvariesinversely with the value ofrugositycoefficientof , however, undergochangeswithpassageoftime, it maydecreasewiththe rugositycoefficientAneffectiverugosityco -efficientispossibleto bederivedIIIsuchsituationwhere the sides and bed arehavingdifferenttypesoflining.