Example: tourism industry

대인관계 형용사척도(KIAS-40) 타당화 연구

- 583 - (KIAS-40) * ( , 2004) , ( ) . (n=503) NEO , , . 2 , . , .. , . : (KIAS-40), , , , , * 2004 . : , 2 , E-mail : : The Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy2005, Vol. 17, No. 3, 583-598 : - 584 - PA 90 BC NO 135 45 DE LM180 0 FG JK 225 315 HI 270 1.

정남운 / 대인관계 형용사척도(kias-40) 타당화 연구 - 585 - 제작이 시도된 바 있다(권석만, 김정욱, 2000; 정남운, 2004).

Information

Domain:

Source:

Link to this page:

Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:

Other abuse

Advertisement

Transcription of 대인관계 형용사척도(KIAS-40) 타당화 연구

1 - 583 - (KIAS-40) * ( , 2004) , ( ) . (n=503) NEO , , . 2 , . , .. , . : (KIAS-40), , , , , * 2004 . : , 2 , E-mail : : The Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy2005, Vol. 17, No. 3, 583-598 : - 584 - PA 90 BC NO 135 45 DE LM180 0 FG JK 225 315 HI 270 1.

2 , .. (circumplex model) , (Plutchik & Conte, 1997). Leary(1957) - - . (x ) 8 16 (Kiesler, 1983, 1996). 90 8 (octants) , PA, BC, DE, FG, HI, JK, LM, NO . 8 .. BC , JK , , , .. Wiggins(1991, 1994) (Interpersonal Adjective Scale-R; IAS-R) Horowitz(1979, 1988; Horowitz, Rosenberg, Baer, Ureno, & Villasenor, 1988) (Inventory of Interpersonal Problems; IIP) (IIP-C; Alden, Wiggins, & Pincus, 1990).

3 IIP-C ( , , , , , , 2002; , 2001a), / (KIAS-40) - 585 - ( , , 2000; , 2004).. , . Wiggins(1979) 16 128 (IAS) , 64 (IAS-R) (Wiggins, Trapnell, & Phillips, 1988). , , (Wiggins, Phillips, & Trapnell, 1989). (2000) IAS-R . ( , , , 2000), ( , 2001b). , .. (2004) 40 (KIAS-40).

4 , . 214 5 8 . , .. , . , . 5 (Five Factor Model) 5 . ( ), , , , , (McCrae & Costa, 1989). , (Trapnell & Wiggins, 1990; Wiggins, Trapnell, & Phillips, 1988). (problem version).

5 , : - 586 - .. , . (KIAS-40) , .. 1 3 229 , 81 , 146 ( 2 ) ( ) . 2 274 , 92 , 179 ( 3 ) ( ) . 173 , 325 ( 5 ) 503 , ( ) .. (KIAS-40) (2004) , 8 5 . / (PA), / (BC), / (DE), / (FG), / (HI), / (JK), / (LM), / (NO) . ( ) .79~.90 . NEO (NEO-PI-R) Costa McCrae(1992) 5 1985 , , , , 5 . 6 ( 8 ).

6 (1997) .. (E1), (E2), (E3), (E4), (E5), (E6) .. (A1), (A2), (A3), (A4), (A5), (A6) . (1997) .72~.83( .95), .68~.77( .91) ( ) ..79~ .86( .94) , .72~.80( .89) . / (KIAS-40) - 587 - 1. 8 , ( ) ( ) 1. PA( / ) ( ) .88 2. BC( / ) ( ) .63 3. DE( / ) ( ) .75 4. FG( / ) ( ) .82 5. HI( / ) ( ) .80 6. JK( / ) ( ) .75 7. LM( / ) ( .96) .82 8. NO( / ) ( ) .90n=503 (IIP-C) (2001a) Horowitz (1988) , 64 . 5.

7 95 ( ) . 1(n=229) NEO , 2(n=274) . , . (8 ) 1 .. (JK, LM, NO, PA) (BC, DE, FG, HI) (Wiggins, 1979) . 5 BC . 2 . , . 0 , .. 2 2 , , . varimax ( - ) ( - ) . 3.

8 : - 588 - 3. 1. PA .00 .81 2. BC .44 3. DE 4. FG 5. HI 6. JK .58 7. LM .75 .08 8. NO .40 .64n=503. 2 varimax . 2. 8 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 1. PA 2. BC .46 3. DE .60 4. FG .22 .60 5. HI .27 .62 6. JK.

9 05 .39 7. LM .18 .54 8. NO .58 .15 .47 . , . 2 , . 2 2 . , Fisher(1983) .. (cosine) , . Fisher(1983) 0= 1- /180 ( ) . Fisher 0 0~1 , 0 , 1 . 4 . , 1 , 2 . Fisher , x2(1)=2n cos2(n.)

10 8) / (KIAS-40) - 589 - 2.. , .990 . , = , p<.05. 1 2 ( 1 = , p<.05; 2 = , p<.05). , . : - 590 - 4. 8 0 (1) (2) (1) - (2) cosine 0 1. PA 2. BC .976 .93 3. DE .996 .97 4. FG .997 .97 5. HI .985 .94 6. JK.


Related search queries