Example: biology

LEHMAN COLLEGE Faculty Name

5/11/17 annual Faculty evaluation Conference Report p. 1 LEHMAN COLLEGE annual Faculty evaluation Conference Report Faculty Name: Faculty Rank: evaluation Period: July 1, 20 to June 30, 20 Process: Summary of conference, formal evaluation and statement of goals completed within 10 days of the conference by department chair (or designee). Sent to Faculty for response (optional) and signature within 10 days. When signed, the completed evaluation is uploaded by the chair to Digital Measures. Completion checklist: Upload Chair evaluation to Digital Measures Date: Copy to Faculty Date: Chair Signature: Date: Faculty Signature: Date: 5/11/17 annual Faculty evaluation Conference Report p.

5/11/17 Annual Faculty Evaluation Conference Report p. 2 . Chair’s Annual Evaluation . Include (a) Summary of conference with faculty member; (b) Evaluation of teaching, scholarship, and service; and (c) Goals agreed upon for the upcoming year . Evaluation should provide an action plan

Tags:

  Annual, Evaluation, Faculty, Annual evaluation, Annual faculty evaluation

Information

Domain:

Source:

Link to this page:

Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:

Other abuse

Advertisement

Transcription of LEHMAN COLLEGE Faculty Name

1 5/11/17 annual Faculty evaluation Conference Report p. 1 LEHMAN COLLEGE annual Faculty evaluation Conference Report Faculty Name: Faculty Rank: evaluation Period: July 1, 20 to June 30, 20 Process: Summary of conference, formal evaluation and statement of goals completed within 10 days of the conference by department chair (or designee). Sent to Faculty for response (optional) and signature within 10 days. When signed, the completed evaluation is uploaded by the chair to Digital Measures. Completion checklist: Upload Chair evaluation to Digital Measures Date: Copy to Faculty Date: Chair Signature: Date: Faculty Signature: Date: 5/11/17 annual Faculty evaluation Conference Report p.

2 2 Chair s annual evaluation Include (a) Summary of conference with Faculty member; (b) evaluation of teaching, scholarship, and service; and (c) Goals agreed upon for the upcoming year. evaluation should provide an action plan for any evaluation areas that need improvement. Rating: Satisfactory Needs Improvement Unsatisfactory 5/11/17 annual Faculty evaluation Conference Report p. 3 Faculty comments (optional).


Related search queries