Transcription of LIPARI - medicalsupplychain.com
1 IN THECIRCUITCOURTOF JACKSONCOUNTYAT INDEPENDENCE,MISSOURID efendants.)))))))))))CaseNo. OS16-CV-04217 SAMUELK. LIPARI (Assigneeof DissolvedMedicalSupplyChain,Inc.,Plainti ff, ,LLC,et aI.,DEFENDANTGHXLLC'SMOTIONTO DISMISSPLAlNTIFF'SPETITIONFORFAlLURETO STATEA CLAlMPursuantto MissouriRulesof (a)(6),DefendantGHX,LLC("GHX")movesthis Courtfor an OrderdismissingPlaintiffsPetitionbecause it failsto stateaclaimuponwhichreliefcan be broughtsix separatecausesofactionagainstGHX(as wellas all the otherdefendants),includingMissouriAntitr ustStatute(CountsI, II and III),tortiousinterferencewithbusinessrel ations(CountIV),fraud(CountV)and primafacietort (CountVI).In noneof thesecountsdoesPlaintiffestablishthe presenceofall the elementsnecessaryfor a short,Plaintiffsantitrustclaimsshouldbed ismissedbecausetheyare (1) timebarred;(2) Plaintifflacksstandingto assertthem;(3)Plaintiffis collaterallyestoppedfromassertingthe claims;(4) the claimsare barredby theNoerr-Penningtondoctrine;(5) thereis no concertedactionalleged.
2 And(6) Plaintifffailstosufficientallegemonopoly poweror the elementsof an attemptto dismissedbecausehe failsto pleadthe existenceof misleadingstatementoromission(to the extentGHXhad a dutyto speakout)madeby GHXto Plaintiff,or that Plaintiffreliedon anystatementby dismissedbecausePlaintifffailsto pleadthatGHXknewor intentionallyinterferedwiththe contractsorbusinessexpectanciesthat the Plaintiffmayhavehad and theyare primafacietort claimshouldbe dismissedbecausehis allegationscontractthe basisfor recoveryunderthe theoryof forthin GHX'sSuggestions,DefendantGHXrequeststha t this CourtdismissPlaintiffsPetition.~MichaelS . SERVICET heund;:r~edherebycertifiesthata trueandaccuratecopyof the foregoingwasforwardedthis ~dayof June,2008,by firstclassmail,postageprepaidto:SamuelK. Lipari297 NE BayviewLee'sSummit,MO640643
