1 LOS ANGELES COUNTY sheriff 'S DEPARTMENT . ADMINISTRATIVE INVESTIGATION. TIMELINESS audit . 2016-5-A. JIM McDONNELL. sheriff . November 15, 2016. LOS ANGELES COUNTY sheriff 'S DEPARTMENT . audit and Accountability Bureau ADMINISTRATIVE INVESTIGATION TIMELINESS audit . Project No. 2016-5-A. audit Report PURPOSE. The audit and Accountability Bureau (AAB) conducted the Administrative Investigation Timeliness audit under the authority of the sheriff of Los ANGELES COUNTY . The audit was performed to determine how the Los ANGELES COUNTY sheriff 's DEPARTMENT ( DEPARTMENT ), Internal Affairs Bureau (IAB) adhered to DEPARTMENT policies and procedures as they pertain to Administrative Investigations, Shooting Reviews, and Force Reviews. The audit also examined how the current policies relate to the implemented recommendations from the Citizens' Commission on Jail Violence (CCJV).
2 1. The AAB conducted this performance audit under the guidance of Generally Accepted Government Auditing The AAB determined the evidence obtained was sufficient and appropriate to provide a reasonable basis for the findings and conclusions based on the audit objectives. BACKGROUND. The mission of the IAB is to conduct thorough Administrative Investigations, Shooting Reviews, and Force Reviews with integrity, objectivity, diligence, and confidentiality. Their responsibilities include conducting administrative investigations of policy violations, monitoring criminal investigations of DEPARTMENT members, responding to deputy-involved shootings, specific use of force incidents, preparing administrative reviews of shooting, and force incidents for the Executive Force Review Committee (EFRC).3. In its report, the CCJV made recommendations to the Los ANGELES COUNTY Board of Supervisors regarding investigations and discipline within the DEPARTMENT .
3 The CCJV. reported, There have been well-documented lapses in reporting, investigating and disciplining use of force in jails. Additionally, the CCJV found the investigative process often took too long to complete, and there were multiple deficiencies in the investigatory process. 1 On September 28, 2012, the Citizens' Commission on Jail Violence published 64 recommendations for reforms in the DEPARTMENT . Then sheriff Leroy D. Baca agreed to implement all of the recommendations. 2 United States Government Accountability Office - By the Comptroller General of the United States, December 2011, Government Auditing Standards 2011 Revision. 3 Manual of Policy and Procedures, Section 3-10 - Executive Force Review Committee ADMINISTRATIVE INVESTIGATION TIMELINESS audit . Project No. 2016-5-A. As a result of these findings, the CCJV recommended the DEPARTMENT 's investigative and disciplinary system be revamped (CCJV Recommendation ), the Internal Affairs Bureau be appropriately valued and staffed by personnel who can effectively perform the sensitive and important work of that Bureau (CCJV Recommendation ), and the DEPARTMENT implement an enhanced and comprehensive system to track force reviews and investigations (CCJV Recommendation ).
4 California Government Code, Sections 3300-3313, is cited as the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act (POBOR), and establishes procedures for the handling of administrative investigations against public safety officers wherein the disposition could lead to punitive action. Moreover, the POBOR limits a public agency's ability to impose any type of punitive action against a public safety officer if the investigation of any misconduct is not completed within one year of the public agency's discovery of the allegation of the violation. Upon receipt of a personnel complaint or upon notification that a personnel incident involving possible misconduct has occurred, a unit commander or higher ranking executive may order an administrative investigation. An administrative investigation names a DEPARTMENT member as a subject, and alleges a violation of DEPARTMENT policy by that subject.
5 While most investigations will be conducted at the unit level, there are situations which require assignment to IAB, such as when witnesses are spread over a large geographic area, subjects are supervisory personnel, or when the allegations, if founded, may result in discharge. An IAB Force/Shooting Response Team investigates deputy-involved shootings, force incidents resulting in admittance to a hospital, significant use of force, and other significant incidents requiring a comprehensive PRIOR AUDITS. This was the first Administrative Investigation Timeliness audit conducted by the AAB. This space intentionally left blank. 4 Manual of Policy and Procedures, Section 3-10 - Activation of the IAB Force/Shooting Response Teams Page 2 of 22. ADMINISTRATIVE INVESTIGATION TIMELINESS audit . Project No. 2016-5-A. METHODOLOGY. Scope The audit encompassed three main objectives reviewing Administrative Investigations, Shooting Reviews, and Force Reviews.
6 The applicable Manual of Policy and Procedures (MPP) sections, IAB Management Directives, the Administrative Investigations Handbook (Handbook),5 and the POBOR were used as the criteria to measure against the selected Administrative Investigations, Shooting Reviews, and Force Reviews to determine compliance as they relate to timeliness of the investigation. audit Time Period The audit time period was from January 1, 2014, through December 31, 2014. audit Population Using the Personnel Performance Index (PPI),6 auditors identified 256 Administrative Investigations conducted by IAB personnel during the 2014 calendar year that were available for review. A statistical sample comprised of 70 Administrative Investigations was reviewed for this Two Administrative Investigations were deselected because they were tolled and They were replaced with the next two randomly selected cases.
7 Auditors identified the total number of Shooting Reviews in 2014 was 35. Eleven of the 35 were not selected because eight cases had not been completed at the time of Three cases did not have any documentation available in PPI at the time of review, and were unable to be tested. 5 Manual of Policy and Procedures, Section 3-04 - Administrative Investigation Procedures, refers investigators to the Administrative Investigations Handbook, published by the IAB, for procedural information. The most current revision for the Handbook available on the IAB Intranet site is dated October 17, 2005. 6 The Personnel Performance Index application provides systematic recording of data relevant to incidents involving administrative investigations, shooting reviews, and force reviews handled by the DEPARTMENT (LASD Personnel Performance Index User Reference Manual, November 15, 1999).
8 7 A statistically valid sample was identified using a statistical one-tail test with a 95% confidence level and a 4% error rate. 8. The POBOR has stipulations where an administrative investigation may be tolled beyond the one-year statute such as when the employee is also the subject of a criminal investigation, the matter is subject to civil litigation, or the investigation involves more than one employee and requires a reasonable extension. 9. There are instances where a shooting review may be delayed such as when there is a concurrent criminal investigation, the District Attorney has not yet determined the lawfulness of the shooting, or where there is an allegation of misconduct. Page 3 of 22. ADMINISTRATIVE INVESTIGATION TIMELINESS audit . Project No. 2016-5-A. There were a total of 48 Force Reviews identified in 2014. Twenty-seven were not selected for review.
9 Fourteen were incomplete and had not yet been reviewed by the EFRC. One force case was not applicable for IAB review. One case was reviewed by the Special Enforcement Bureau. Eleven cases did not have any documentation available in PPI at the time of review, and were unable to be tested. SUMMARY OF audit FINDINGS. The management and staff at the IAB and the Advocacy Unit were accommodating and cooperative in providing the necessary information, and in validating the findings. The audit identified several areas in need of improvement. Refer to Table No. 1 below. Table - Summary of Findings Objective Met the audit Objectives No. Standard 1 IAB INVESTIGATION TIMELINESS. 1(a) IAB Investigation Timeliness - Case Completion by Investigator 0%. 1(b) IAB Investigation Timeliness - Extension Request 0%. 1(c) IAB Investigation Timeliness - Advocacy Unit Preparation of Disposition Sheet 0%.
10 IAB Investigation Timeliness - Cases Returned to IAB for Further 1(d) 60%. Investigation 1(e) IAB Investigation Timeliness - Finalization of Disposition Sheet 57%. 1(f) IAB Investigation Timeliness - Letter of Intent 100%. 1(g) IAB Investigation Timeliness - One Year Statute 98%. 2 IAB AND EXECUTIVE FORCE REVIEW COMMITTEE - SHOOTINGS. 2(a) Shooting Review by IAB Completed within 90 Calendar Days 0%. 2(b) EFRC Shooting Review Scheduled within 30 Calendar Days 75%. 2(c) Unit Commander Disposition within 15 Calendar Days 0%. 3 IAB AND EXECUTIVE FORCE REVIEW COMMITTEE - FORCE. 3(a) Force Review by IAB Completed within 90 Calendar Days 0%. 3(b) EFRC Force Review Scheduled within 30 Calendar Days 67%. 3(c) Unit Commander Disposition within 15 Calendar Days 0%. This space intentionally left blank. Page 4 of 22. ADMINISTRATIVE INVESTIGATION TIMELINESS audit .