Example: dental hygienist

MIL-STD-105E (1989) – Sampling Procedures and Tables for ...

NOT MEASUREMENT. SENSIUYE h MIL-STWI05E. 10 MAY 1989. SUPERSEDING. MIL-STD-105D. 29 APRIL 1963. military STANDARD. Sampling Procedures AND Tables . FOR inspection BY ATTRIBUTES. AMSC N/A AREA Qcil . ~~~ & Approved for public reiesse; dktribution is Unlimfi !QL- SI'D105E. DEPA~ W DEFENSE. Washbgmn, DC 20301. SAT*LDG P~ T I!ND'ZABESFOR 1. Ttis tilitarystandad is approvedfor use by all Depsmmms and Jqencies of - ~~~ of ~f- .. 2. Beneficial~.ts Cemmm&tiom. additions,Wetions) and any ~ may beef usein~this~ shouldbe addressedto: CnRInancier Us.

not measurement sensiuye h mil-stwi05e 10 may 1989 superseding mil-std-105d 29 april 1963 military standard samplingprocedures and tables for inspection by attributes

Tags:

  Military, Inspection, Attribute, Mil std, 510e, Inspection by attributes

Information

Domain:

Source:

Link to this page:

Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:

Other abuse

Transcription of MIL-STD-105E (1989) – Sampling Procedures and Tables for ...

1 NOT MEASUREMENT. SENSIUYE h MIL-STWI05E. 10 MAY 1989. SUPERSEDING. MIL-STD-105D. 29 APRIL 1963. military STANDARD. Sampling Procedures AND Tables . FOR inspection BY ATTRIBUTES. AMSC N/A AREA Qcil . ~~~ & Approved for public reiesse; dktribution is Unlimfi !QL- SI'D105E. DEPA~ W DEFENSE. Washbgmn, DC 20301. SAT*LDG P~ T I!ND'ZABESFOR 1. Ttis tilitarystandad is approvedfor use by all Depsmmms and Jqencies of - ~~~ of ~f- .. 2. Beneficial~.ts Cemmm&tiom. additions,Wetions) and any ~ may beef usein~this~ shouldbe addressedto: CnRInancier Us.

2 Amy AmamE!!!Rem-a, Dwelopnent and +-king Ckmer M-IN: SK?R-BAC-WBM!J . 6. Picatinnytisenal,NJ 07806-5000. by self-a=-essed&.andardizat ion Dmmmt m~ PrepSal (DD Fom 1426)~L-hq at the md of this docmmt or letter. ii MZL-S'IZ+1C5Z. mRE3m* . ms providessawling proce&res and referwm Tables for use in on the +mce 05 e%.ts when a sa~ies of-iots or bat~s are produ~ ti a stableenvironmrt. This publicationshouldbe-used to guide the user in the ~kpmnt of an that providesa co=. eff~ive qroach to attaining cm-:idm~ in pro&t ~liance wi thca%racaual te-&%i~ reqJ ats.

3 The user is warned of the assumedrisks relativeto the *sem sanple size and w-. ~ifications shouldnot contakn requirement s for use of specific , !23Z shxld .!y provideAQL's or H?D's as a -~rmem. pkns fc= coxinuous, ra'hr than lot inspection ,are contm M. iii ~ GmTmTs Page Paragraph 1. 1. -se .. 1. *liation .. 1. 2. ~IxmPEurs- .. 1. W. qplicable .. 1. 3. =INITIONS .. 1. Qdality Ievel WE) .. 2. Average Outgo ~Quality(lQ) .. 2. Averaoe OutqoingQualityWt ( 2. Classificationof 2. 2. 2. 2.. 3. DefectsPer Ru@edUn .. 3.

4 ~i~.. 3. ~aim by Attribxes .. 3. w&or 3. Im or Batch 3. Major 3. Major 3. Minor Defect .. 3. Minor Defeaive.. 3. 4. ~s 4. 4. Sanple Size COde~tt=v .. 4. Salq?ling 4. unit of 4. 4. ~mxm='nm .. 4. Written ~ .. 4. NmcVnfozmne .. 4. Fonmticm and Itificatim of ~ or =Cks.. 5.. 5. ML *.. 5. Umkation .. 5. choosingAQU .. 5.. iv mL-sm-lo5E. CcNTmrs - Conttiued. Page Paragraph ~B~ .. Sarrpling. 5.. 5. The of .. 5: Double or MQtiple Sampling .. 5. ~on P~ .. WitdlirlgP~ .. : Normalto .. 6. Tight- to Normal .. 6. Normalto ~.

5 *..**..**.. 6. Rduced to 6. Disconthtion of~ .. 7. 7. ~ion Wvel .. 7. Co& utters .. 7. ~aining San@ing 7. TYF= of sapling Pkns .. 8. Determinationof~ability.. 8. P~Defective~ion.. 8. Single Sanql@ 8. (?. Sa@ing 8. FhltipleSanpling. *.. 8. ~ p~ for Redu*IrqeCtion .. 8. DefectsPer ?lundmdt?nit s~ion .. 9. Idniting@ality .. 9. ~s ..*.. 9. ~t@~merkic ~ .. 9. A~ge Sanple Size .. 9. 5. TABES ..*..*..*.. 11. Table I. Sa@e Size Coda 13. II-A. Single San@ing Plans for Normal- ~im Naster table).. 14. II-B. Single Smpliq Plms for Tightewd ~i~ ~=t~le) 15.

6 II-C. Single Sapling Plans for ~. ~ia 16. III-A. Double SamplingPlans for Normal ~i~ -a~le).. 17. III-B. Dcxble Sapling Plans for Tight- ~m ~er=e) .. 18. III-C. Double Reduced ~im (Mastertable).. 19. v MIL-STW105E. mt'n'mrs- Conthued. Page Table IV-A. Mltiple Sa@ing Plans for Norml Inspectim M3ster-le) .. 20. IV-B. for Tightened ~im (MastertaMe) .. 22. TV-c. Mdtiple SamplingPlans for ReduOed inspection (Mastertable).. 24. V-A. Average Outgoinguty IAmit F~s for lwml~on (Sin@e Zq) .. 26. V-B. ~ge Outgo* QualityLimit Fa=ors for TightenedIMpeCtiOn (S=le ~1~).

7 :.. 27. %3-A. uting Quality (h Perumt Def-iue) for Wch a Pa = 10% (forNomal Inspemion, S~le Saxrpling) .. *o 28. V3-3. LimitingQuality (inDefectsper ~. Unks) for which the Pa = 10% (forNozmal inspection ,Single Sanplhg). 29. XI-A. Unliziq Quality (inP~t mfecti=) fo~. khid. thePa = 5% (forNom@ ~ionl SingleSawling).. 33. VII-B. LimitingQuality (fiDefectsper Hmdma Units) for which the Pa = 5% (f= W*. ~m, Siwle S=@@ ..*.. 31. ~*~1- Li,mitNmbersfor ~ .. 32 . IX. Auerage SampleSize Cumes for DDuble and .. 33. ~ltig pl= and cparatirq~amic Cumes (andData) for: X-A.)

8 San@e Size ~ktter 34. X-3 . Sanple Size ~Utter B .. 36. x-c. Sanple Size Mkter C .. 38. X-D. San@e Size Co& LetterD .. 40. X-E. Sanple Size ~Utter E .. 42. X-F. San@e Size Mletter F .. 44. x-G . Sanple Size MUtter G .. - 46. X-H. ~le Size @ckletter H .. 48. X-J. qksM-~ *.. 50. X-K. Sauple Size MIetter K ..----------------- 52. X-L. ~le S~M~ L .. 54. x-M. Sanple Size M~M .. 56. X-N. San@eSizeM E~N .. 58. x-P. Sal@esizeM wtterP .. 60. x-Q. ~le S~Mk= * + *.==.* + *..= 62. X-R. ~le S@ Mk=R ..= ~ 64. vi mL-sl'wlo5E.

9 , CCN'TS - Continued. Page x-s. ~~e size ~ ~tt~v S .. 66. Paragraph 6..*.. v Intf2nckci 67. Subject'I'em(keyuofi) tist~ .. 67. ~fr~P~im Issw .. 67. mlmsAL.. 68. F2L-S'ID-105S. 1. ~~~. Pqse. This ~li=tim establisheslot or bat~ sapling plans and proceduresfor ~ion by attributes. 1'nis publi=tion shallnot & irfter- superm3e or confli= with any amtraCtti ~ s. m words awqX , a~ , acceptable * e tc, refer only to the contractor's use of the sanplingpkms Writ- in this ~anddonotinplyana~ W. -theGove&mmnt to accept any prcdom.

10 Deterfnination of aqability by the Gwen :=% shall k as desm~ in contractual~ts. me Sarfpling plans *sdhd in Ws standad m awli-le to U's of .01pe~t or ~~ and ore not suitablefor ++lications where quality1-1s in the defemive are ; per million range m be realiz05. are applicable, a. ElrIc items. b. Cmponents c. Qerations d. Materialsin process. e. Su@ies in storage. f. Maintenance~ations. 9. Data or records. h. Mmbistrative ~- Theseplans are intendedprimarilyto be used for a continuingseries of lots 0: batches. The plans may also be used for the inspectionof isolatedlots or Mches, W.


Related search queries