民事訴訟と電子署名 - miyauchi-law.com

1 2011 10 20 10 20 2 2011 10 20 3 RSA1024bit SHA-1 (*) ( ) (*) 2006 ( )2011 10 20 41 2006 ( ) 2011 10 20 5 ( ) NEC AI, GPKI LGPKI 2004 NEC 2007 2008 2011 2011 10 20 6 ( ) (3 ) (2 ) (1 ) 5 9 11 11 12 7 (2011 )

2 (2010 ) (1 ) 5 3 8 9 3 2011 10 20 7 4 (2 2 ) 3 ( ) 4 ( ) 1 2 ( (1 6~7 48% 2011 2011 10 20 8 ( ) ( ) 2 2 2 ( ) ( ) 12 2011 10 20 9 5 5 ( ) 10 20 5 50 7 ( A )))

3 5 1 95% 2011 10 20 10 2011 10 20 12 5 ( 199 ) 5 ( ) 2011 10 20 13 ( ) F R (F R R F ( ))

4 F R F 3 F F F F not F F F R F R F F R F ( )2011 10 20 14 ( 50 10 24 29-9-1417) 3 ( ) 10~20 100% ( ) (*) ( )

5 (*) 2 5 ( ) 427, 2009. 2011 10 20 16 ( ) 228 1 ) ( 2004. 2011 10 20 17 ( ) ( 18-4-597) ( 228 4 ( ( 31 )( 186 2 )( 228 4 )))

6 228 4 2011 10 20 18 ( ) ( ) 145 230 1 2011 10 20 19 ( ) ( ) 3 ( )

7 CA 2 3 ( 4 1 ) ( 17 ) 2011 10 20 20 2011 10 20 22 (1)

8 446 2 3 e- 2011 10 20 23 (2) 132 10 1 2011 10 20 24 (3) EU-Directive EU Directive on electonic signatures Article 5.

9 Member States shall ensure that an electronic signature is not denied legal effectiveness and admissibility as evidencein legal proceedings solely on the ground thatit is: In electronic form or Not based upon a qualified certificate ( ) Uniform Electronic Transaction Act(1999) Section 7 (a): A record or signature may not deniedlegal effect or enforceability solely because it is in electronic form. 2011 10 20 25 (4) ( ) (WinMX ) HP )2011 10 20 26 ( 231 )

10 ( 359-194) ( 894-14)2011 10 20 27 WinMX ( 1152-131 - 1212-2)