Example: bankruptcy

National Energy Technology Laboratory

A Review of the CO2 Pipeline Infrastructure in the April 21, 2015 DOE/NETL-2014/1681 OFFICE OF FOSSIL Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory A Review of the CO2 Pipeline Infrastructure in the Disclaimer this report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference therein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof.

This report was prepared by Energy Sector Planning and Analysis (ESPA) for the United States Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Energy Policy and Systems Analysis (EPSA) and the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL). This work was completed under DOE NETL Contract Number DE-FE0004001. This work was performed under ESPA Task 200.01.03.

Tags:

  Report, This, Energy, Prepared, This report was prepared

Information

Domain:

Source:

Link to this page:

Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:

Other abuse

Transcription of National Energy Technology Laboratory

1 A Review of the CO2 Pipeline Infrastructure in the April 21, 2015 DOE/NETL-2014/1681 OFFICE OF FOSSIL Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory A Review of the CO2 Pipeline Infrastructure in the Disclaimer this report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference therein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof.

2 The views and opinions of authors expressed therein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. - A Review of the CO2 Pipeline Infrastructure in the Author List: Energy Sector Planning and Analysis (ESPA) Matthew Wallace Advanced Resources International Lessly Goudarzi, Kara Callahan OnLocation Robert Wallace Booz Allen Hamilton this report was prepared by Energy Sector Planning and Analysis (ESPA) for the United States Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Energy Policy and Systems Analysis (EPSA) and the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL). this work was completed under DOE NETL Contract Number DE-FE0004001. this work was performed under ESPA Task All images in this report are property of NETL unless otherwise noted. The authors wish to acknowledge the excellent guidance, contributions, and cooperation of the NETL and EPSA staff, particularly: Anthony Zammerilli, NETL Technical Project Monitor Judi Greenwald, EPSA Deputy Director for Climate Environment and Efficiency James Bradbury, EPSA Senior Policy Advisor David Rosner, EPSA Senior Policy Advisor Maria Vargas, Technical Contracting Officer Representative Donald Remson, NETL DOE Contract Number DE-FE0004001 A Review of the CO2 Pipeline Infrastructure in the this page intentionally left blank.

3 A Review of the CO2 Pipeline Infrastructure in the i Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary ..1 2 Introduction ..2 3 Current CO2 Pipeline Infrastructure ..3 Overview ..3 Permian Basin ..4 Gulf Coast ..7 Rocky Mountains ..8 Mid-Continent ..10 Other CO2 Pipeline Networks ..12 4 Potential CO2 Pipeline Network Expansion ..12 Projections Based on Industry Announcements ..12 Wyoming Pipeline Development and Greencore Pipeline Extension ..12 Green Pipeline Laterals ..13 Potential Additional CO2 Supplies from Natural Sources ..15 Additional CO2 from Industrial Sources ..16 Projections using the EIA NEMS analysis ..17 CO2 Price and CO2 Emissions CO2 Pipeline Expansion Results ..19 Rates of Projected Pipeline Construction ..30 5 Permitting, Regulations, and Policies ..31 Overview ..31 Federal Regulation ..31 General Oversight ..31 Safety Pipeline Siting and Eminent Domain.

4 32 Texas/New Mexico ..32 Mississippi ..32 Other States ..33 Other State Policies ..33 6 Conclusions ..33 7 Topics for Further Study ..34 Development of Oversight Authority ..34 8 Bibliography ..35 Appendix ..37 A Review of the CO2 Pipeline Infrastructure in the ii Exhibits Exhibit 1 Geographic areas with large-scale CO2 pipeline systems operating currently in the .. 3 Exhibit 2 Current CO2-EOR operations and infrastructure .. 4 Exhibit 3 Permian Basin CO2 pipeline infrastructure .. 5 Exhibit 4 Permian Basin CO2 transportation pipelines .. 6 Exhibit 5 Gulf Coast CO2 pipeline infrastructure .. 7 Exhibit 6 Gulf Coast CO2 transportation pipelines .. 8 Exhibit 7 Rocky Mountain CO2 pipeline infrastructure .. 9 Exhibit 8 Rocky Mountain CO2 transportation pipelines .. 10 Exhibit 9 Mid-Continent CO2 pipeline infrastructure .. 11 Exhibit 10 Mid-Continent CO2 transportation pipelines .. 11 Exhibit 11 Other CO2 transportation pipelines in the.

5 12 Exhibit 12 Denbury s Wyoming CO2 pipeline developments .. 13 Exhibit 13 Planned Webster CO2 lateral pipeline .. 14 Exhibit 14 Planned Conroe CO2 lateral pipeline .. 14 Exhibit 15 Planned Lobos CO2 pipeline in New Mexico .. 15 Exhibit 16 Planned CO2 transportation pipelines .. 16 Exhibit 17 CO2 Price under the Cap40 and CP 25 scenarios .. 18 Exhibit 18 CO2 Emission reductions for all sectors under the Cap40 and CP 25 scenarios .. 19 Exhibit 19 CO2 pipeline schematic .. 19 Exhibit 20 CO2 transportation by market segment (2040) .. 20 Exhibit 21 CO2 transportation by miles as a function of pipeline diameter (2040) .. 21 Exhibit 22 Inter- and Intrastate pipeline segments (2040) .. 23 Exhibit 23 Transportation Costs for the Cap40 case .. 24 Exhibit 24 Transportation costs for the CP25 case .. 24 Exhibit 25 Transportation cost as a function of CO2 throughput .. 25 Exhibit 26 Oil produced by source for all three cases*.

6 26 Exhibit 27 Oil Production by EOR in the Cap40 case .. 27 Exhibit 28 Oil Production by EOR in the CP25 case .. 28 Exhibit 29 Power plant pipeline build-out by 2040 for the Cap40 case .. 29 Exhibit 30 Power plant pipeline build-out by 2040 for the CP25 case .. 29 Exhibit 31 Power plant pipeline build-out by 2030 in the $25/tonne CO2, low carbon scenario . 30 Exhibit 32 Comprehensive List of CO2 Pipelines .. 37 Exhibit 33 State-Level Inter- and Intrastate Pipeline Segments for the Cap40 Case .. 39 Exhibit 34 State-Level Inter- and Intrastate Pipeline Segments for CP25 Case .. 40 Exhibit 35 Cumulative CO2 Pipelines Construction .. 41 Exhibit 36 Total Mass of anthropogenic CO2 Sequestered .. 41 Exhibit 37 Sequestered Anthropogenic CO2 Captured at Industrial vs. Power Sector Sources .. 42 Exhibit 38 Electric Capacity with Carbon Sequestration .. 42 Exhibit 39 Oil Production (MMBbls/day) Associated with CO2-EOR, in 2015, 2030, and 2040 (table).

7 42 Exhibit 40 oil production (MMBbls/day) associated with CO2-EOR, in 2015, 2030, and 2040 (graph) .. 43 A Review of the CO2 Pipeline Infrastructure in the iii Acronyms and Abbreviations AEO2014 Annual Energy Outlook BAU Business as usual Bcf Billion cubic feet Bcf/d Billion cubic feet per day BLM Bureau of Land Management CAFE Corporate Average Fuel Economy CCA Cedar Creek Anticline CO2 Carbon dioxide CCS Carbon capture and storage CTUS Capture, transport, utilization, and storage DOE Department of Energy DOT Department of Transportation EIA Energy Information Agency EIS Environmental Impact Statement EOR Enhanced oil recovery EPSA Energy Policy and Systems Analysis FERC Federal Energy Regulatory Commission GAO General Accountability Office GHG Greenhouse gas GW Gigawatt ICC Interstate Commerce Commission ICF ICF International IGCC Integrated gasification combined cycle in Inch ITC Investment Tax Credit MBbl/d Million barrels per day mi Mile MM.

8 Mm Million MMcfd Million cubic feet per day MMBbls Million barrels of oil MMBOE Million barrels of oil equivalent MMT Million metric tons NEJD North East Jackson Dome NEMS National Energy Modeling System NETL National Energy Technology Laboratory PCS Potash Corp of Saskatchewan PHMSA Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration PTC Production Tax Credit RCSP Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships SACROC Scurry Area Canyon Reef Operators Committee STB Surface Transportation Board TBD To be determined United States WPA Wyoming Pipeline Authority A Review of the CO2 Pipeline Infrastructure in the iv this page intentionally left Review of the CO2 Pipeline Infrastructure in the 1 1 Executive Summary Spanning across more than a dozen states and into Saskatchewan, Canada, a safe and regionally extensive network of carbon dioxide (CO2) pipelines has been constructed over the past four decades.

9 Consisting of 50 individual CO2 pipelines and with a combined length over 4,500 miles, these CO2 transportation pipelines represent an essential building block for linking the capture of CO2 from electric power plants and other industrial sources with its productive use in oilfields and its safe storage in saline formations. Expanding this system could help to enable fossil-fired power generation in a carbon constrained environment and increase Energy security by enhancing domestic oil production. The vast majority of the CO2 pipeline system is dedicated to enhanced oil recovery (CO2-EOR), connecting natural and industrial sources of CO2 with EOR projects in oil fields. Roughly 80 percent of CO2 traveling through pipelines is from natural (geologic) sources; however, if currently planned industrial CO2 capture facilities and new pipelines are built, by 2020 the portion of CO2 from industrial-sources could be nearly equal to that from natural sources.

10 In terms of future potential, it is estimated that up to 4 million barrels per day of oil could potentially be produced in the with CO2-EOR and that 85% of this would be reliant on industrial CO2; contributing to significantly fewer oil imports and annual emissions reductions of 400 MMTCO2, by 2030. Just over 4 percent of total crude oil production is currently produced through EOR, though this is projected to increase to 7 percent by 2030, and a National carbon policy could significantly change the outlook, creating incentives for electric power plants and other industrial facilities to reduce CO2 emissions through carbon capture technologies and improving the economics for oil production through EOR. In a low-carbon case, construction through 2030 would more than triple the size of current CO2 pipeline infrastructure, through an average annual build-rate of nearly 1,000 miles per year. The regulation of CO2 pipelines is currently a joint responsibility of federal and state governments.


Related search queries