NEW FORM CODE CLASSIFICATION - ephmra.org

1 NEW FORM CODE CLASSIFICATION GUIDELINES VERSION 2018 PUBLICATION DATE JANUARY 2018 New Form Code CLASSIFICATION Guidelines VERSION 2018 Page Amendment Date: EphMRA 2 CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION 4 GENERAL CLASSIFICATION RULES 5 - Rule 1. Level of Detail 5 - Rule 2. Long-Acting and Ordinary Forms 5 - Rule 3. Alphabetical Rule 6 - Rule 4. Oral Systemic Forms Which Require Modification Before Use 6 THE HIERARCHIES WITHIN THE SYSTEM 7 DEFINITON OF THE FIRST LETTER 8 THE VALID FIRST LETTER CODES 9 Oral Solid Ordinary 10 Oral Solid Long-Acting 10 Oral Liquid Ordinary 10 Oral Liquid Long-Acting 10 Parenteral Ordinary 10 Parenteral Long-Acting 11 Rectal Systemic 11 Nasal Systemic 11 Other Systemic 11 Oral Topical 11 Topical, Dermatological, Haemorrhoidal.

2 External 12 Ophthalmic Otic Nasal Topical Lung Administration Vaginal/Intra-uterine Non-human Use and Others Unknown DEFINITION OF THE SECOND LETTER 12 12 13 13 14 14 14 15 THE VALID SECOND LETTER CODES DEFINITION OF THE THIRD LETTER 15 16 New Form Code CLASSIFICATION Guidelines VERSION 2018 Page Amendment Date: EphMRA 3 VALID COMBINATIONS OF SECOND AND THIRD LETTERS AND DEFINITIONS .A. Tablets .B. Coated Tablets .C. Capsules .D. Solid Special Forms.

3 E. Powders/Granules .F. Gases .G. Liquids .H. Pressurised Aerosols .J. Bath Preparations .K. Teas .L. Suppositories .M. Ampoules .N. Pre-filled Syringes .P. Vials .Q. Infusions .S. Ointments .T. Creams .V. Gels and Sols .W. Medicated Dressings .Y. Other Special Forms .Z. Medical Aids VALID COMBINATIONS OF FIRST, SECOND AND THIRD LETTERS LIST OF VALID NEW FORM CODES AND THEIR ABBREVIATED DESCRIPTIONS 17 17 19 21 23 25 27 28 31 33 35 36 37 39 42 45 47 48 49 51 54 57 60 84 New Form Code CLASSIFICATION Guidelines VERSION 2018 Page Amendment Date: EphMRA 4 INTRODUCTION The THREE LETTER CODE (TLC) was introduced as a dosage Form Code in the audits during the middle of the 1960s.

4 A large number of new dosage forms have appeared since that time and it was considered that revision of the system was required in order that a unified, worldwide CLASSIFICATION could be developed. The Annual General Meeting of the EphMRA in 1984 decided to create a Working Party to discuss suggested improvements to the CLASSIFICATION , and members were appointed from representative countries and IMS. This group based their work upon proposals, which were already under consideration between some members and IMS.

5 The result of the Working Party deliberations was the NEW FORM CODE (NFC) which was accepted for the worldwide introduction at the 1985 AGM of EphMRA. At that meeting it was also agreed that the New Form Code Committee should assume responsibility for further improvements and development of the NFC in addition to the allocation of correct codes. In 1988 the NFC replaced the TLC in the audits and on the databases. As far as possible the conversion had been completed automatically using IMS programs based on the "form descriptions".

6 Where that description was incorrect, assistance was given by the NFC Committee. All users are requested to inform either IMS or members of the NFC Committee if they discover an error or believe that a code allocation may be in doubt. Since the main objective of the NFC is to maintain an international uniformity of the coding structure for the audits and the databases, it is important that the CLASSIFICATION remains simple and easy to understand. Only if this is achieved for all forms and countries will it be possible to use the code for international investigation of dosage forms.

7 These notes are known as the New Form Code CLASSIFICATION Guidelines, and are intended to be used in conjunction with the CLASSIFICATION . This English version of the Guidelines is the authorised, definitive version produced by EphMRA. Within these Guidelines the terms "active ingredient" and "active substance" are synonymous and used interchangeably. These terms cover chemical, biological, biotechnical, living ( fly larvae) and synthetic agents and extracts be they tissue plant or natural. New Form Code CLASSIFICATION Guidelines VERSION 2018 Page Amendment Date: EphMRA 5 GENERAL CLASSIFICATION RULES Rule 1.

8 Level of Detail The form should be classified according to the information that is contained in the reference literature or announcements by the manufacturer. For example when the manufacturer uses the name suspension in the pack description and the literature specifies powder for suspension; the correct code is dry powder for suspension. Generic products will be classified according to the level of information available from the generic manufacturers. Parallel imports will be classified according to the local product against which the products is imported.

9 Rule 2. Long-acting and Ordinary Forms Long-acting as used in the New Form Code CLASSIFICATION primarily refers to the form of a preparation and not to the active ingredient. However, modification of the chemical ingredient pegylation, may also be classified as long-acting if long action is claimed by the manufacturer. Long-acting (Retard) forms are only classified as long-acting if this information is provided by the manufacturer in the literature or if implied in the product name Depo Provera (Upjohn) or pack description.

10 If the ingredients are known pharmacologically to have a long duration of action and the manufacturer does not specify that the form is long-acting, the form is classified ordinary. The manufacturer's marketing policy must not be changed by the CLASSIFICATION . Injectable preparations with a special 'long-acting' formulation oil, oily suspension, aqueous suspension, ester etc for intramuscular, subcutaneous, intra-articular and intrasynovial administration are also classified as long-acting. Note that forms described as delayed action or delayed release are classified as ordinary unless they are also long-acting.