1 PROPOSAL FOR. EQUALIZATION levy . ON. SPECIFIED TRANSACTIONS. (Report of the Committee on Taxation of E-Commerce). PROPOSAL FOR EQUALIZATION . levy ON SPECIFIED. TRANSACTIONS. (Report of the Committee on Taxation of E-Commerce). February, 2016. Prepared by the Committee on Taxation of E-Commerce formed by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India 1|Page 2|Page CONTENTS. Section 1 Constitution and Mandate of the Committee Section 2 Digital Economy: Current status and Growth Prospects Section 3 Tax Challenges from Digital Economy & Action 1 in BEPS.
2 Issues related to Tax Neutrality between Domestic &. Section 4. Multi-National Enterprises and their Implications Principles for Allocating Taxing Rights, Factors that Section 5 contribute to Profitability & Historical Review of Existing Rules Broader Tax Challenges related to Nexus and Section 6 Characterization of Income from Digital Transactions and common Disputes Issues related to Value of data & User Activity in Section 7. Multidimensional Business Models Recent International Literature on Taxation of Digital Section 8.
3 Economy Enterprise Options to address broader tax challenges of Digital Section 9. Economy in the Indian Context Section 10 Characteristics of the Proposed EQUALIZATION levy '. Section 11 Conclusions & Recommendations of the Committee 3|Page Executive Summary The Committee on taxation of E-Commerce examined the tax issues arising from the new business models employed in the digital economy, in particular issues relating to tax nexus rules under existing law and tax treaties, characterization of payments made for services and facilities provided primarily through digital means and issues related to valuation of data and user contribution in profits of digital enterprises.
4 The Committee took cognizance of the Report on Action 1 of Base Erosion & Profit Shifting (BEPS) Project, wherein very significant work has been undertaken for identifying the tax challenges arising from digital economy, the possible options to address them and constraints likely to be faced. The Committee also notes that this report has been accepted by G-20 countries, including India and OECD, thereby providing a broad consensus view on these issues. The Committee took note of the work done in this field by other experts, as well as the lack of uniformly accepted standards in taxation of royalty and fee for technical services, and the resultant tax disputes.
5 The Committee also took note of the divergent approaches to characterization of such Income taken by the taxpayers, tax authorities and appellate authorities, and the litigation arising from such inconsistencies. The Committee acknowledges the need for addressing all these issues in a holistic manner. The Committee notes that the BEPS Report on Action 1 clearly brings out that the physical presence nexus in existing international taxation rules, which were developed in the last century keeping in view the business models of that time, provided a reasonable nexus test for identifying significant participation of a traditional brick & mortar enterprise in the economic life of a jurisdiction.
6 However, with the evolution of new business models in digital economy, where revolutionary technological developments have made the need for physical presence redundant, it is no more a justifiable indication of nexus. The BEPS Report also brings out very clearly the challenges that are faced in characterizing the payments for digital goods and services, which are likely to be faced more often by countries like India, which opt for taxation of royalty and fee for technical services in the source jurisdiction. Lastly, the BEPS Report also recognizes the new issues that have emerged in respect of multidimensional business models, like valuation of data belonging to residents of source jurisdiction and the user contributions to the profitability of enterprises, both for the purpose of determining nexus and attributing profits.
7 The Committee notes that the ability of multinational enterprises to avoid taxes completely in the source jurisdiction under the existing rules, poses significant challenges and concerns for countries like India. The unfair advantage enjoyed by them over their Indian competitors can make Indian enterprises, both digital as well as brick & mortar ones, relatively less competitive 4|Page in the long run, resulting in detrimental impact on growth of Indian enterprises. Further, their ability to avoid payment of taxes in India can also adversely impact revenue collections, and lead to a rising tax burden on Indian enterprises and Indian citizens that could be even more detrimental to Indian economy as a whole.
8 Thus, the Committee considers that there is a need for addressing these issues without any further delay. The BEPS Report on Action 1 clearly highlights the need for modifying existing international taxation rules, and identifies three options, a new nexus based on significant economic presence, a withholding tax on digital transactions, and EQUALIZATION levy . The Report elaborates in detail the characteristics of these options and their possible tax design. The Report does not recommend any of these options at this stage, in view of the work that may be required in the area of attribution of profits, but concludes by recognizing the right of any country that may wish to adopt any of these options, either under its domestic law or in its bilateral tax treaties.
9 After examining the three options identified in the report, the Committee notes that compared to the first two options, a new nexus based on significant economic presence and the withholding tax on digital transactions, which would require changes in a number of tax treaties, the third option of EQUALIZATION levy ' provides a simpler option that can be adopted under domestic laws without needing amendment of a large number of tax treaties. Accordingly, the Committee recommends the adoption of this option to address the tax challenges of digital economy and provide greater certainty and predictability in its taxation.
10 The EQUALIZATION levy imposed on the payment for digital transactions, would not be a tax on Income , and hence would not be covered by tax treaties. As EQUALIZATION levy is not proposed as tax on Income , it would need to be imposed outside the Income -tax Act, 1961. The Committee proposes that the EQUALIZATION levy may be imposed on specified digital services and facilities including online marketing and advertisements, cloud computing, website designing hosting and maintenance, digital space, digital platforms for sale of goods and services and online use or download of software and applications.