QC for Airfield Asphalt Paving Projects High Risk

1 46th Annual Quality Assurance Workshop QA\QC for Airfield Asphalt Paving Projects high RiskINTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND Mark D. McGuire, , Sr. Vice President for Campbell & Paris Engineers, a small business Civil Engineering firm focusing on planning, design, and construction management for aviation related Projects . P. Kerr Chase, , Construction Phase Service Manager Personal focus on FAA / State / Local funded aviation Projects since 1998. Funding agency grant assurances typically require use of FAA specifications, quality control and quality assurance procedures.

2 Adherence to the Brooks Act and Design Bid Build process with contracts between contractor / owner and engineer / owner. 46th Annual Quality Assurance Workshop QA\QC for Airfield Asphalt Paving Projects high RiskGOVERNING DOCUMENTS Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circulars (ACs) mandatory when Airport Improvement Funds or Passenger Facility Charges are used for project . Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) 150 Series (Airports) 5370-10 (F) Current Standards for Specifying Construction of Airports Part 5 Flexible Surfaces Courses Item P-401 Plant Mix bituminous Pavements Item P-402 Porous Friction Course (Central Plant Hot Mix) Item P-403 Plant Mix bituminous Pavements (Base, Leveling or Surface Course)

3 46th Annual Quality Assurance Workshop QA\QC for Airfield Asphalt Paving Projects high RiskP-401 Plant Mix bituminous PavementsDescription, Materials, Composition, Construction Methods, Material Acceptance, Contractor Quality Control, Method of Measurement, Basis of Payment, Testing Requirements, Material RequirementsWhat is old is new! Marshall Mix Design is only approved method for FAA Projects . superpave can be approved through Regional Office for aircraft weights < 100K lbs and through HQ for weights over 100K lbs with a Modifications to Standards.

4 Engineering Brief 59A (May 2006) provides guidance on using superpave mixtures. FAA William J. Hughes Technical Center, Atlantic City International Airport, NJ work in progress. 46th Annual Quality Assurance Workshop QA\QC for Airfield Asphalt Paving Projects high RiskP-401 Plant Mix bituminous PavementsMajor Issues with Adopting superpave (stolen from Roy D. McQueen) Required number of gyrations for mix design Volumetric appropriate level of VMA and VTM Gradation Requirements Field compaction StandardMix Designs superpave AASHTO T 312 Gyratory Compactor vs Marshall Apparatus ASTM D 6926 Quality of Asphalt Cement common to see polymer modified PG 70-22 required for Airfield Projects .

5 Informal FAA guidance is to always use polymer modified unless directed Annual Quality Assurance Workshop QA\QC for Airfield Asphalt Paving Projects high RiskMix Designs (continued) a. Percent passing each sieve size for total combined gradation, individual gradation of all aggregate stockpiles and percent by weight of each stockpile used in the job mix formula. b. Percent of Asphalt cement. c. Asphalt performance, viscosity or penetration grade, and type of modifier if used. d. Number of blows of hammer compaction per side of molded specimen.

6 E. Mixing temperature. f. Compaction temperature. g. Temperature of mix when discharged from the mixer. h. Temperature-viscosity relationship of the Asphalt Annual Quality Assurance Workshop QA\QC for Airfield Asphalt Paving Projects high RiskMix Designs (continued) i. Plot of the combined gradation on the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) 45 power gradation curve. j. Graphical plots of stability, flow, air voids, voids in the mineral aggregate, and unit weight versus Asphalt content. k. Percent natural sand. l. Percent fractured faces.

7 M. Percent by weight of flat particles, elongated particles, and flat and elongated particles (and criteria). n. Tensile Strength Ratio (TSR). o. Anti-strip agent (if required). p. Date the job mix formula was Annual Quality Assurance Workshop QA\QC for Airfield Asphalt Paving Projects high RiskMix Designs (continued) The Marshall Design Criteria applicable to the project shall be specified by the Engineer from the information shown below:Test PropertyPavements Designed for Aircraft Gross Weights of 60,000 Lb or More or Tire Pressures of 100 PSI or MorePavements Designed for Aircraft Gross Weights Less Than 60,000 Lb or Tire Pressures Less Than 100 PSIN umber of Blows7550 Stability, pounds (Newtons)2150 (9564)1350 (6005)Flow, in.

8 ( mm)10-14 10-18 Air Voids (percent) Voids in Mineral Aggregate (minimum)See Table Table 2 Maximum Particle SizeMinimum Voids in Mineral Aggregate mm16% mm15%1 mm14%1 mm13%46th Annual Quality Assurance Workshop QA\QC for Airfield Asphalt Paving Projects high RiskMix Designs (continued) Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP) should not be used for surface mixes, except on shoulders. It can be used very effectively in lower layers or for shoulders. Engineer to specify the maximum percentage of reclaimed Asphalt allowed in the mix.

9 The amount of RAP shall be limited to 30 percent, as long as the resulting recycled mix meets all requirements that are specified for virgin mixtures. The Contractor may obtain the RAP from the job site or an existing source. We typically note: RAP shall not be permitted in this Annual Quality Assurance Workshop QA\QC for Airfield Asphalt Paving Projects high RiskTest Section Test Section / Test Strip varies from project to project but typically consists of a 300 X 20 area placed in two lanes, with a longitudinal cold joint, and shall be constructed at the same depth specified for the construction of the course which it represents.

10 The test section shall be evaluated for acceptance as a single lot in accordance with the acceptance criteria in paragraph and The test section shall be divided into equal sublots. As a minimum the test section shall consist of 3 sublots. Test strip acceptance criteria exceeds production acceptance criteria!46th Annual Quality Assurance Workshop QA\QC for Airfield Asphalt Paving Projects high RiskTest Section (continued) The test section shall be considered acceptable if; 1) stability, flow, mat density, air voids, and joint density are 90 percent or more within limits, 2) gradation and Asphalt content are within the action limits specified in paragraphs and 5b, and 3) the voids in the mineral aggregate are within the limits of Table 2.