Qualified Domestic Relations 7 Orders and Spousal …

1 7 Qualified Domestic Relations Orders and Spousal Rights JESSICA LAUREN BERGER. Harrison & Held, LLP. Chicago . IICLE gratefully acknowledges the contributions of Sally Doubet King to the previous edition of this chapter.. COPYRIGHT 2015 BY IICLE . 7 1. ESTATE PLANNING IN RETIREMENT BENEFITS. I. [ ] Introduction II. Qualified Domestic Relations Orders A. [ ] Qualified Domestic Relations Orders The Exception to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 Spendthrift Provisions B. [ ] Overview of Applicable Law and Guidance C. [ ] Effective Date of Qualified Domestic Relations order Rules D.

2 [ ] Employee Benefit Plans to Which Qualified Domestic Relations Orders Apply E. [ ] Alternate Payees F. [ ] Qualified Domestic Relations order Requirements G. [ ] Administrative Procedures for Qualification H. [ ] United States Department of Labor Interim Final Regulations 1. [ ] Subsequent Domestic Relations Orders 2. [ ] Timing of Domestic Relations Orders I. Plan Features To Consider in Drafting Qualified Domestic Relations Orders 1. [ ] Defined-Contribution Plan 2. [ ] Retroactive Assignment Dates in Defined-Contribution Qualified Domestic Relations Orders 3.

3 [ ] Defined-Benefit Plan J. [ ] Divorce Decree as a Qualified Domestic Relations order K. [ ] Pitfalls to Qualification L. [ ] Qualified Domestic Relations order After Death of Participant M. [ ] Contrary Beneficiary Designations N. [ ] Qualified Domestic Relations order Modification O. [ ] Bankruptcy of Participant P. [ ] Receipt of Benefits Q. [ ] Dividing the Benefit Shared Payment or Separate Interest R. [ ] Taxation of Benefits III. Qualified Retirement Plan Obligations Regarding spouses A. [ ] Qualified Joint and Survivor Annuity 1. [ ] Waiver of Automatic Qualified Joint and Survivor Annuity Distribution Form 2.

4 [ ] Qualified Joint and Survivor Annuity Notice Rules B. Qualified Preretirement Survivor Annuity 1. [ ] Commencement of Annuity Payments 2. [ ] Waiver of Qualified Preretirement Survivor Annuity C. [ ] Tax Issues for Surviving spouses 7 2 Qualified Domestic Relations Orders AND Spousal RIGHTS. IV. [ ] Qualified Domestic Relations Orders Apply to Same-Sex Couples V. Sample Forms and Documents A. [ ] Sample Spousal Consent and Waiver Election B. [ ] Sample Qualified Domestic Relations order for Defined-Benefit Plan C. [ ] Sample Qualified Domestic Relations order for Defined-Contribution Plan D.

5 [ ] Qualified Domestic Relations order Checklist E. [ ] Sample Letter to Plan Participants Regarding Qualified Domestic Relations order Procedures ILLINOIS INSTITUTE FOR CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION 7 3. ESTATE PLANNING IN RETIREMENT BENEFITS. I. [ ] INTRODUCTION. This chapter provides an overview of the rights of the spouse of a participant in a Qualified retirement plan, the obligations of the Qualified retirement plan with respect to the spouse, and the treatment of Domestic partners with respect to retirement plan benefits under current law. After the Supreme Court's decisions in United States v.

6 Windsor, ___ ___, 186 808, 133. 2675 (2013) and Obergefell v. Hodges, ___ ___, ___ ___, 135 2584. (2015), same-sex married couples have the same rights as opposite-sex married couples with respect to Qualified retirement plans. In Windsor, the Supreme Court held that the provision in the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), No. 104-199, 110 Stat. 2419 (1996), that defined marriage as a legal union between one man and one woman and spouse as a person of the opposite sex was unconstitutional. Windsor therefore mandates the recognition of same-sex marriages under federal law.

7 In Obergefell, the Supreme Court ruled that the Fourteenth Amendment requires states to allow and to recognize same-sex marriage. This chapter is intended only as a starting point for gaining familiarity with this subject matter; a seasoned benefits practitioner should be consulted for a more comprehensive analysis. II. Qualified Domestic Relations Orders . A. [ ] Qualified Domestic Relations Orders The Exception to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 Spendthrift Provisions The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), No. 93-406, 88.

8 Stat. 829, governs Qualified retirement plans. See 29 1001, et seq. The federal statute provides a comprehensive set of rules to protect the integrity of employee benefit plans and rights of participants and beneficiaries in those plans. ERISA provides that the benefits conferred to participants and beneficiaries in Qualified retirement plans may not be assigned or alienated. 26 401(a)(13); ERISA 206(d)(1), 29. 1056(d)(1). These spendthrift provisions are intended to ensure that a participant's retirement benefits are actually available to provide financial support during the participant's retirement years.

9 As the Supreme Court stated, ERISA's spendthrift provision reflects a considered congressional policy choice .. to safeguard a stream of income for pensioners (and their dependents ..), even if that decision prevents others from securing relief for the wrongs done them. Guidry v. Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund, 493 365, 107 782, 110 680, 687 (1990). A Qualified Domestic Relations order (QDRO) is an exception to the anti-alienation provision of ERISA. 26 401(a)(13)(B). A QDRO is any Domestic Relations order (DRO) such as a judgment, decree, or marital settlement agreement that is made pursuant to a state's Domestic Relations law that allows for the payment of Qualified retirement plan benefits to certain persons who would otherwise be prevented from receiving such benefits.

10 Specifically, a QDRO provides for child support, alimony payments, or marital property rights to a spouse, former spouse, child, or other dependent of a participant in a Qualified retirement plan. 26 414(p)(1)(B);. ERISA 206(d)(3)(B)(ii), 29 1056(d)(3)(B)(ii). 7 4 Qualified Domestic Relations Orders AND Spousal RIGHTS ERISA preempts any and all state laws insofar as they relate to employee benefit plans. ERISA 514(a), 29 1144(a); Egelhoff v. Egelhoff, 532 141, 149 264, 121. 1322 (2001). It is not surprising that during the years immediately after the passage of ERISA, courts were divided on the question of whether anti-alienation rules applied to state DROs imposing family-support obligations on a participant's benefit in a Qualified retirement plan.