Example: dental hygienist
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ...
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) NOS.72817282/2017 Sushila Aggarwal and others …Petitioners Versus State (NCT of Delhi) and another …Respondents J U D G M E N T M.R. SHAH, J. In the light of the conflicting views of the different Benches
Tags:
Information
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Documents from same domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE …
www.main.sci.gov.inA. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of Mandamus directing and commanding the respondent nos. 2 & 3 to award the mark of question no. 46 of Booklet Series ‘C’ to the petitioner and prepare a fresh select list. B. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of Mandamus directing the respondent
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ...
www.main.sci.gov.inthe second supplementary charge sheet was filed on 3rd July, 2017 against another 5 accused persons. The said accused persons are presently absconding. The charges later came to be framed on 20th June, 2019 for offences under Sections 121, 121A, 122, 120B IPC
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL …
www.main.sci.gov.in4 While addressing these challenges, the Bench of three judges of this Court took note of several decisions of this Court in which the right to privacy has been held to be a constitutionally protected fundamental right. Those decisions include : Gobind v State of Madhya Pradesh6 (“Gobind”), R Rajagopal v State of Tamil Nadu7
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL …
www.main.sci.gov.in10. The appellant filed a petition for execution of money decree in the High Court of Delhi on 27th April, 2006. A reply to the execution petition was filed by the respondent on 17th January 2007, raising several objections which are available at its command
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK …
www.main.sci.gov.inhigh court of delhi gautam narayan versus devina sharma ia no.36569/2022-exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment 32 slp(c) no. 4432-4435/2022 xiv high court of delhi gautam narayan versus nisha tomar and ors. {mention memo} ia no.36466/2022-exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment new delhi 10-03-2022 19:46:00 additional ...
Related documents
ARTICLE I. APPELLATE PROCEDURE - Rhode Island
www.courts.ri.govARTICLE I. APPELLATE PROCEDURE . Rule 1. Scope of rules and mandatory electronic filing . - (a) Scope of Rules. These rules govern procedure in appeals to the Supreme Court from the Superior Court and the Family Court, and in applications for writs or other relief which the Supreme Court is competent to give. (b) Rules Not to Affect Jurisdiction.
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL …
main.sci.gov.inin the supreme court of india civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal nos. 843-844 of 2021 (arising out of slp (c) no. 1531-32/ 2021) bharat sanchar nigam ltd. & anr. …appellants versus m/s nortel networks india pvt. ltd. …respondent j u d g m e n t indu malhotra, j. leave granted. 1.
Rules of Appellate Procedure - United States Courts
www.uscourts.govThe Supreme Court prescribes Federal Rules of Appellate Proce-dure pursuant to section 2072 of Title 28, United States Code, as enacted by Title IV ‘‘Rules Enabling Act’’ of Pub. L. 100–702 (ap-proved Nov. 19, 1988, 102 Stat. 4648), effective December 1, 1988, and section 2075 of Title 28. Pursuant to section 2074 of Title 28, the