return to updates Stephen Hawking - Miles Mathis

1 return to updatesStephen Hawkingdied and has been replaced by Miles MathisFirst published April 17, 2015I have written several papers critiquing Stephen Hawking , including a long one on his Brave New World series for the BBC. But this is my first paper really linking my science research with my faked events research. I will use simple photo analysis and facial analysis to quickly show you the current Stephen Hawking is not the same person as the original Stephen should not surprise you too much, especially if you know something about ALS. ALS is Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, also known as Lou Gehrig's Disease. We are told Hawking has had ALS for over 52 years, which is a record by many decades. Jason Becker is the only person I have heard of who has lived more than 20 years with the disease, so there is about a three-decade difference between the longest survivor and the second longest survivor. That is a more than 100% difference between first and second place.

2 It would be like Justin Gatlin running the 100 meters in seconds, and Usain Bolt beating him with a time of seconds. In other words, statistically it doesn't happen. The average survival time for ALS is four years. When Hawking was first diagnosed in 1963, doctors gave him two years to live. And yet here we are, 52 years later and counting. Should you believe it? Well, no. Like Becker, it appears the real Hawking did beat the odds and live for about 20 years. But at some point he was replaced. I have no proof he died, but I assume that is why they replaced him. He was a very useful public relations entity for physics, and they didn't want to lose him. But rather than speculate on that, let us go right to the evidence. I won't call it proof, since of course you are free to disagree with me. This is an opinion piece, not a court transcript; and even if it were a stamped court finding, you would be free to disagree with it. You don't have to agree with anything anyone tells you, ever.

3 Remember that. This paper is nothing more than presented evidence, evidence I find compelling. If you also find it compelling, fine. If you don't, also fine. The picture under title is the real Hawking . Notice the longish face and skinny neck. Also notice the dark brown hair. Here is another picture of the real Hawking : Let that etch into your brain. This is also Hawking , a few years later: You see that his hair is turning gray. But the thing to notice here is his teeth. Pretty awful, right? Well, it gets worse. He is now fully gray, and he has pretty much lost his lower teeth. I am not a dentist and don't know exactly what is going on there, but it looks like those teeth have been filed down or chipped down, with only stub fillings left. The next step would be dentures, right? Well, no. The next step, apparently, was going from gray to blonde, even in the eyebrows, and a whole new set of old yellow teeth. He also bought some new fat cheeks. Amazing right?

4 Actually, that is the replacement. That isn't Hawking , as I hope you can see now that I point it out. Go back two photos and compare the teeth directly. Not even close. They found a guy with the same nose and big ears, but otherwise they don't look that much alike. This is the guy you have been looking at for the past thirty years. Which means Hawking might not have written A Brief History of Time, which came out in 1988. I haven't pinpointed the date, but that was about the time they made the switch. My current guess is early 80's, which if true would mean that book was a forgery. You will say, That is just a younger Hawking , before he lost those lower teeth. No, it isn't. I just showed you the younger Hawking , and he didn't look like that. Compare them side by , the first picture is Hawking from the 1970's. The second is Hawking from the 1990's. Amazing that he aged 20 years with a debilitating disease and got younger looking at the same time, isn't it? Hawking was still looking young in 2007, when he went aboard the ZeroG Plane: See how it says zero g on his shirt?

5 That is from when he went up in the plane, which was in 2007. He was supposed to be 65 in 2007. Looks great for 65, eh? Unfortunately, he already looked older than that in 1982, 25 years earlier:1982 2007 His face also got shorter. Normally your face will get longer as you age, not shorter. Here is a more recent photo of the impostor: Again, the teeth are the clue. This may be the same guy as our blonde impostor, but it certainly isn't Stephen Hawking . Go back to the earlier photos. Those four lower teeth were supposed to be gone decades ago, filed down to filling nubs. Are we supposed to believe they regrew? Do those look like caps or dentures to you? Would you pay a dentist to replace your teeth with those? No, we are supposed to believe that is what he has left of his real teeth, obviously. But I have just shown you why that cannot be the case. Here is a photo I found of the blonde impostor where is it really easy to see he isn't Hawking : That picture is from a foreign magazine, I guess, since it seems to have been suppressed in the US and on the internet.

6 I only found one copy of it, and the full-size image is gone. The website has been scrubbed. This makes me think photos of this guy have normally been retouched to make him look a bit more like Hawking . And here is a really weird one, although I bet you won't see it until I point it out: Well, did you find the problem? This time it is with the hands. Look at the coloration and texture. Those are waxwork hands. If you can't see it there, maybe you can see it here: Another reason I noticed the hands is that they don't look like ALS hands. In Hawking 's biography, they admit that his fingers had already begun to curl in the 1960's. Those with this disease not only can't straighten their fingers, they can't straighten their wrists. In older pictures of Hawking , he has badly curled wrists, with his left hand normally bent sideways. So how did his hands suddenly get so smooth and relaxed in his 70's? Many of the photos of Hawking have been faked, as you might expect given what we just discovered.

7 Take a look at these two, for instance: Those are both sold to us as wedding pictures of Hawking and Elaine Mason. So how many times did they get married, and how many wedding dresses did Mason have? I knew these were faked even before noticing the two wedding dresses, because this is the real Hawking , not the blonde impostor. But Mason married the blonde impostor, so I knew these photos must be faked. How did I know this was Hawking so fast? Look at the photo of him from the side. See how skinny his neck is and how it slopes up quickly to meet his skull? Then he has a protruding rear skull. The blonde impostor doesn't have that. The shape of his skull is entirely different, and it is very obvious from the side. The real Hawking was always much more bony and angular. I also beg you to notice again how old Hawking looks there. That was supposed to be 1995 (but was really 1984-ish). Then how did he look like this in 2007? dated 1995 but actually ~1984 2007 Twelve (actually 23) years later with a debilitating disease, and he looks ten years younger?

8 How does that work? Where did he get those cheeks? If this analysis is true, it would mean that Hawking 's recent books are forgeries, unless he wrote them from beyond the grave (or is still alive as a brain in a tank somewhere). And it would mean his recommendation in 2012 that Peter Higgs get the Nobel Prize was a forgery. The only person recommending anything in that case would be this impostor. You may say something like, Yes, I see what you are saying, but I am going to withhold judgment until this breaks in the press. If you are right, it can't stay hidden. Someone will sue or something and a judge will decide. To this I say, don't hold your breath. These things do stay out of the mainstream press indefinitely, since the press is controlled. For example, the truth about the Lincoln assassination still hasn't come out in the mainstream, 150 years later. Odds are, no one will ever decide this for you, so you have to do your own research. If you doubt my analysis, do your own.

9 This is how things now work, and if you want to know something, you have to research it and make your own decision. Which is why I don't mind putting this on my science site. That is what science is, after all. Not accepting someone else's decision which would be belief by hearsay or reputation. Science is studying the facts yourself and coming to your own conclusions. You cannot do science second hand. You can learn from a teacher, but ultimately you have to be your own scientist. But let's not quit there. I would really like to know if Hawking 's famous book is a forgery. I have proposed before that the sales numbers for that book were faked, since they aren't believable. But if we can show that Hawking was already gone before the book came out, that would go a long way to proving the sales figures were also faked. If they can fake the author they are hardly going to stick at faking the sales numbers, are they? Since most of the photos of Hawking on the internet are conveniently not dated, this line of research is difficult.

10 So let's go to his biography to see if we can find other clues to the date of the switch. We find the important paragraph at Wikipedia without much effort:During a visit to the European Organisation for Nuclear Research on the border of France and Switzerland in mid-1985, Hawking contracted pneumonia, which in his condition was life-threatening; he was so ill that Jane was asked if life support should be terminated. She refused but the consequence was a tracheotomy, which would require round-the-clock nursing care, and remove what remained of his speech.[55] [56] The National Health Service would pay for a nursing home, but Jane was determined that he would live at home. The cost of the care was funded by an American foundation.[57] [58] Nurses were hired for the three shifts required to provide the round-the-clock support he required. One of those employed was Elaine Mason, who was to become Hawking 's second wife. Wow. It's all there, we only have to unwind it.