Example: bachelor of science

serMon eVaLUation ForM - 9Marks

serMon eVaLUation form . STRONGLY STRONGLY. DISAGREE DISAGREE NEUTRAL AGREE AGREE. Exegesis/Theology 1. The preacher clearly set the context of the passage. 1 2 3 4 5. 2. The serMon revealed the main point of the text. 1 2 3 4 5. 3. The preacher clearly preached Jesus from the text. 1 2 3 4 5. 4. The preacher noted the special way God relates with mankind at 1 2 3 4 5. this point in redemptive history. Application 1. The preacher made clear and helpful application of the text to 1 2 3 4 5. various types of people. 2. The serMon was gospel-centered. 1 2 3 4 5. 3. The preacher presented clear ways to respond to the serMon . 1 2 3 4 5.

serMon eVaLUation ForM. The preacher clearly set the context of the passage. 2. The sermon revealed the main point of the text. 3. The preacher clearly preached Jesus from the text. 4. The preacher noted the special way God relates with mankind at this point in redemptive history.

Tags:

  Form, Evaluation, Sermon, Sermon evaluation form

Information

Domain:

Source:

Link to this page:

Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:

Other abuse

Advertisement

Transcription of serMon eVaLUation ForM - 9Marks

1 serMon eVaLUation form . STRONGLY STRONGLY. DISAGREE DISAGREE NEUTRAL AGREE AGREE. Exegesis/Theology 1. The preacher clearly set the context of the passage. 1 2 3 4 5. 2. The serMon revealed the main point of the text. 1 2 3 4 5. 3. The preacher clearly preached Jesus from the text. 1 2 3 4 5. 4. The preacher noted the special way God relates with mankind at 1 2 3 4 5. this point in redemptive history. Application 1. The preacher made clear and helpful application of the text to 1 2 3 4 5. various types of people. 2. The serMon was gospel-centered. 1 2 3 4 5. 3. The preacher presented clear ways to respond to the serMon . 1 2 3 4 5.

2 4. The preacher showed care for the audience by preaching to their hearts. 1 2 3 4 5. 5. I would have wanted my non-Christian friends to hear 1 2 3 4 5. this serMon . Presentation 1. The intro was engaging and in line with the text. 1 2 3 4 5. 2. The main idea and overall structure was clear. 1 2 3 4 5. 3. The preacher did not seem too stuck to notes. 1 2 3 4 5. 4. The preacher had dynamic and appropriate voice inflection 1 2 3 4 5. (avoiding ums' and uhs'). 5. The preacher's body language enhanced the serMon and was not 1 2 3 4 5. distracting. Total Score: _____ / 70 = _____ %. To the best of your ability, can you recall what the main point of the serMon was?

3 N O T E S. What did you find most encouraging about this serMon ? What other comments (encouragement or critique) or suggestions do you have?


Related search queries