Example: tourism industry

STRUCTURAL TEST REPORT - Eldorado Stone

ASTM E 330 STRUCTURAL TEST REPORT . Rendered to: Eldorado Stone , LLC. STYLE: CASTLE ROCK. REPORT No.: Test Date: 01/15/07. Through: 01/22/07. REPORT Date: 02/14/07. Record Retention Date: 02/09/11. Revision 1: 07/28/15. ASTM E 330 STRUCTURAL TEST REPORT . Rendered to: Eldorado Stone , LLC. Box 489. Carnation, Washington 98014. REPORT No.: Test Date: 01/15/07. Through: 01/22/07. REPORT Date: 02/14/07. Record Retention Date: 02/09/11. Revision 1: 07/28/15. Project Summary: Architectural Testing, Inc. was contracted by Eldorado Stone , LLC, to perform STRUCTURAL testing on their Castle Rock faux Stone veneer products at Architectural Testing's facility in Kent, Washington.

69947.01-901-44 Page 3 of 4 . A copy of this report will be retained by Architectural Testing, Inc.for a period of four years from the original test date.

Tags:

  Report, Tests, Structural, Structural test report

Information

Domain:

Source:

Link to this page:

Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:

Other abuse

Transcription of STRUCTURAL TEST REPORT - Eldorado Stone

1 ASTM E 330 STRUCTURAL TEST REPORT . Rendered to: Eldorado Stone , LLC. STYLE: CASTLE ROCK. REPORT No.: Test Date: 01/15/07. Through: 01/22/07. REPORT Date: 02/14/07. Record Retention Date: 02/09/11. Revision 1: 07/28/15. ASTM E 330 STRUCTURAL TEST REPORT . Rendered to: Eldorado Stone , LLC. Box 489. Carnation, Washington 98014. REPORT No.: Test Date: 01/15/07. Through: 01/22/07. REPORT Date: 02/14/07. Record Retention Date: 02/09/11. Revision 1: 07/28/15. Project Summary: Architectural Testing, Inc. was contracted by Eldorado Stone , LLC, to perform STRUCTURAL testing on their Castle Rock faux Stone veneer products at Architectural Testing's facility in Kent, Washington.

2 Test specimen description and results are reported herein. Test Methods: The specimen was evaluated in accordance with ASTM E 330, Standard Test Method for STRUCTURAL Performance of Exterior Windows, Doors, Skylights and Curtin Walls by Uniform Static Air Pressure Difference (MODIFIED). Test Specimen Description: General Description: Three 8' wide by 8' high wall samples were prepared. Each wall sample was constructed of Douglas - Fir nominal 2 x 4 plates and 2 x 4 studs spaced 16" on center. Each of the intermediate studs was attached to the top and bottom plates with two 3". drywall screws. 7/16" thick OSB sheathing was fastened to the stud wall with 1-5/8".

3 Drywall screws spaced approximately 8" apart. One layer of 60 minute WRB was stapled to the sheathing. The lb expanded metal lath was applied over the WRB with the staples fastened into the studs every 6". A bed of mortar was applied over the lath and allowed to cure overnight. Following the application of the mortar the individual faux stones were applied in the grouted method. The wall samples were allowed to cure for no less than 28. days and then subjected to tests . Test Description: General Description: Each of the wall samples was subjected to positive and negative STRUCTURAL load tests at psf and 60 psf pressure differentials.

4 Loads were held for 60. seconds. Deflection gauges were used to measure the deflection of the wall assembly. Gauges were mounted to the exterior face of the faux Stone in line with the top, bottom and mid-span of the centermost stud. At the conclusion of each load, the faux Stone was inspected for cracking. Net deflections and visual observations are reported below. Page 2 of 4. Test Results: Test Specimen #1 (Installer: ACCS 2): Pressure Net Deflection Observations psf (positive pressure) " No damage or cracking observed (150 mph wind speed). psf (negative pressure) " No damage or cracking observed (150 mph wind speed).

5 Psf (positive pressure) " No damage or cracking observed (153 mph wind speed). psf (negative pressure) " No damage or cracking observed (153 mph wind speed). Note #1: After completion, loads and inspections at psf and 60 psf pressure differentials, a negative pressure differential of 110 psf (207 mph wind speed) was applied and held for 10 seconds. Following pressure release a visual inspection revealed no visible cracks in the faux Stone . Test Specimen #2 (Installer: LPCS - 1): psf (positive pressure) " No damage or cracking observed (150 mph wind speed). psf (negative pressure) " No damage or cracking observed (150 mph wind speed).

6 Psf (positive pressure) " No damage or cracking observed (153 mph wind speed). psf (negative pressure) " No damage or cracking observed (153 mph wind speed). Note #2: After completion, loads and inspections at psf and 60 psf pressure differentials, a negative pressure differential of 110 psf (207 mph wind speed) was applied and held for 10 seconds. Following pressure release a visual inspection revealed no visible cracks in the faux Stone . Test Specimen #3 (Installer: LYCS - 3): psf (positive pressure) " No damage or cracking observed (150 mph wind speed). psf (negative pressure) " No damage or cracking observed (150 mph wind speed).

7 Psf (positive pressure) " No damage or cracking observed (153 mph wind speed). psf (negative pressure) " No damage or cracking observed (153 mph wind speed). Note #3: After completion, loads and inspections at psf and 60 psf pressure differentials, a positive pressure differential of 110 psf (207 mph wind speed) was applied and held for 10 seconds. Following pressure release a visual inspection revealed no visible cracks in the faux Stone . Page 3 of 4. A copy of this REPORT will be retained by Architectural Testing, Inc. for a period of four years from the original test date. This REPORT is the exclusive property of the client so named herein and is applicable to the sample tested.

8 Results obtained are tested values and do not constitute an opinion or endorsement by this laboratory. This REPORT may not be reproduced, except in full, without approval of Architectural Testing, Inc. For ARCHITECTURAL TESTING, INC: Brian L. Rasmussen Jeffrey L. Dideon Technician Director - Regional Operations JLD:hlr:pac Attachment (pages): Appendix A: Alteration Addendum (1). Appendix B: Eldorado Stone Installation Procedures (6). Page 4 of 4. Revision Log Rev. # Date Page(s) Revision(s). 0 02/14/07 N/A Original REPORT issue 1 07/28/15 Cover page, Page 1 Expiration Date changed to Record Retention Date.

9 APPENDIX A. Alteration Addendum Note: No alterations were required. APPENDIX B. Eldorado Stone Installation Procedures I N S T A L L A T I O N. P R O C E D U R E S.. C143-0603 2003 Eldorado Stone LLC. 2. PREPARING THE SURFACE. OVER SHEETROCK, WALLBOARD, PANELING, ence is by spraying surface with water. If water beads up or PLYWOOD OR OTHER RIGID WOOD-RELATED runs off the wall, the presence of a release agent is likely. If SHEATHING Cover the wall surface with a weather-resis- a release agent is present, acid etch, wire brush surface, or tive barrier. The barrier shall be equal to that provided for in use a metal lath and scratch coat.

10 It is imperative that the the Standard No. 14-1 for kraft waterproof building concrete surface is free of form release contamination if paper or asphalt-saturated rag felt. The building paper or felt lath and scratch coat is not used to ensure a proper bond. shall be applied horizontally with the upper layer lapped over OVER PAINTED, SEALED OR TREATED BRICK, the lower layer not less than 2 inches. Where vertical joints BLOCK, CONCRETE OR OTHER MASONRY SUR- occur, the felt or paper shall be lapped not less than 6 inches. FACES The surface must either a) be cleaned back to the Then install a lb. diamond mesh expanded metal lath or original surface by sandblasting, water blasting, acid etching an 18 gauge woven wire mesh.


Related search queries