Example: bachelor of science

Supplier Assessment Form - Weir Group

Supplier Assessment Supplier NAME:CONTACT PERSON:POSITION: Supplier LOCATION:Existing SupplierNew SupplierCurrent 6 Month DPPM Average (where applicable)Current 6 Month OTD Average (where applicable)TYPES OF OPERATION:FOUNDRYMACHININGFABRICATIONFUL L MANUFACTURINGRAW MATERIALDISTRIBUTOROTHERS (Reference Welding, Coating, NDE Testing Tabs as applicable)Specify here: Supplier Self-AssessmentWeir AuditEVALUATOR:DATE:FOR WEIR OIL & GAS USE ONLYWeir Supply Chain Leader Signature & Date:Weir quality Leader Signature & Date:Printed copies are 1 of 5 WOG-DF-Q 001, Rev 0, May 20, 2019# Confidential - Access limited to Weir personnel or by NDACONTACT INFORMATIONName of Company:Address:City:State:Phone Number:Fax Number:Web site:Contact person 1: Position: Phone No: E-Mail:Contact Person 2: Positio

Evaluation Score: 5 4 3 2 1 SCORE AVG. 1 Quality System Yes, valid certification System,but not certified No system in place 2 Quality System Yes, valid certification System,but not certified No system in place 3 Extenal & Internal Issue Is the company has determines external and internal issues relevant to its purpose and strategic direction? Yes Yes, not documented No

Tags:

  Assessment, Internal, Quality, Supplier, Supplier assessment

Information

Domain:

Source:

Link to this page:

Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:

Other abuse

Advertisement

Transcription of Supplier Assessment Form - Weir Group

1 Supplier Assessment Supplier NAME:CONTACT PERSON:POSITION: Supplier LOCATION:Existing SupplierNew SupplierCurrent 6 Month DPPM Average (where applicable)Current 6 Month OTD Average (where applicable)TYPES OF OPERATION:FOUNDRYMACHININGFABRICATIONFUL L MANUFACTURINGRAW MATERIALDISTRIBUTOROTHERS (Reference Welding, Coating, NDE Testing Tabs as applicable)Specify here: Supplier Self-AssessmentWeir AuditEVALUATOR:DATE:FOR WEIR OIL & GAS USE ONLYWeir Supply Chain Leader Signature & Date:Weir quality Leader Signature & Date:Printed copies are 1 of 5 WOG-DF-Q 001, Rev 0, May 20, 2019# Confidential - Access limited to Weir personnel or by NDACONTACT INFORMATIONName of Company:Address:City:State:Phone Number:Fax Number:Web site:Contact person 1: Position: Phone No: E-Mail:Contact Person 2: Position: Phone No: E-Mail:GENERAL INFORMATIONB usiness Type:Product / Service (WEIR):Other Capabilities:Year Established:Company Ownership:Major Customers:Number of Employees:Number of Shifts:Annual Sales.

2 IT Readiness (Systems):Management System Certificates:Printed copies are 2 of 5 WOG-DF-Q 001, Rev 0, May 20, 2019# Confidential - Access limited to Weir personnel or by NDA Evaluation Score: quality System Yes, valid certification System,but not certified No system in place2 quality System Yes, valid certification System,but not certified No system in place3 Extenal & internal Issue Is the company has determines external and internal issues relevant to its purpose and strategic direction?Yes Yes, not documented No4 Interested Parties Is the company has determines what interested parties are relevant to the QMS?

3 Yes Yes, not documented No5 quality System Yes Yes, not documented No 6 Documentation Is the company's documents & records properly controlled? Yes Partially No7 Doc's review Does the company review customer & general engineering standards/specs? Yes Only when notified No Evaluation Score: QA Policy Avl,displayed,understood Policy awareness,not defined None2 Vision / Mission Communicate/documented Discussed,not documented None in place3 Performance Yes Some evident No KPI's4 Continual Improvement Yes Some evident No5 Customer focus Determined & met Some evident Not determined6 Role/ responsibilities/ Authority Yes & effective Some communication evident No communication Evaluation Score.

4 Training Yes, trained with records Some training evident None evident2 Training Yes, with Assessment records Competency observed No evidence3 Infrastructure Yes, effective Partially / Able to invest Not satisfactory4 Plant layout Yes & documented Yes but not documented None available5 Work environment Yes, effectively Yes but not effectively Not at all Evaluation Score: Product Acceptance All evident with records Some evident None evident2 Change Control Yes & documented Yes, not documented No evidence3 Requirements Yes & documented Yes, not documented No evidence4 Communication Yes & documented Yes, not documented No system evident5 Communication Yes Partially No6 Product Design Yes & documented Yes, not documented No evidence7 Supplier monitoring Displayed with targets vs actual Some evident No system evident8 Supplier monitoring Displayed with targets vs actual Some evident No system evident9 Production Process Yes.

5 Documented & discussed Yes, not documented No evidence10 Maintenance Yes & documented Yes, not documented No evidence11 Tooling Yes & documented Yes, not documented No evidence12 Identification Yes & documented Yes, not documented No evidence13 Conformity Yes & documented Yes, not documented No evidence Evaluation Score: Monitoring Yes & documented Yes, not documented No evidence2 Non conformances Yes & documented Yes, not documented No tracking of scrap3 Continuous Improvement Yes & documented Yes, not documented No evidence4 Continuous Improvement Yes & documented Yes, not documented No evidence5 Monitoring Yes & documented Yes, not documented No evidence6 Data Analysis Yes & documented Yes, not documented No evidence7 Continuous Improvement Demonstrated & defined Demonstrated, not defined No cont.

6 Improvement8 Problem Solving Yes & documented Yes, not documented No evidence9 Corrective Action Yes & documented Yes, not documented No evidence10 Corrective Action Are the corrective actions effective (any recurrences)? Yes,documented,effective Partially, & / or with recurrences No evidence11 Poka yoke Yes & documented Yes, not documented No evidence Evaluation Score: PPE Yes Partially None3 Housekeeping Yes Partially No4 5S Yes & documented Partially None5 EnvironmentDo working areas have sufficient space, lightening,and ergonomically position? Yes Partially None6 Safety Machinery Are primary moving parts of machines adequately guarded ?

7 Yes Partially None7 Safety Lifting OpsAre lifting operations / use of cranes and fork lift trucks safe ? Yes Partially None8 Safety Segregation Are workers segregated from traffic movement and other high risk activities ( metal pouring) where required? Yes Partially None9 Environment & SafetyAre chemical risks adequately controlled (storage and spillage) ? Yes Partially None10 Environment Is there a waste management system / process in place - segregate / recycle? Yes Partially None11 Safety Risk there a robust risk Assessment / job safety analysis programme in place ? Yes & documented Partially None12 Environment Risk Prog.

8 Yes & documented Partially None Overall Avg. ScoreRatingsDevelopment Required > required -- -- < > -- < -- Supplier to be considered0 Company vision / mission communicated / discussed with employees? Does the company set out KPIs, being tracked/ monitored/ reviewed? Are continual improvement tracked / monitored / reviewed? Are customer requirements determined,met for increased customer satisfaction? Does responsibilities and authorities for relevant roles are assigned, communicated and understood within the of the Organization & quality ManagementKey Word Analysis Criteria Is the company ISO 9001 certified?

9 Is the company ISO 14001/ OHSAS certified? Is the quality system defined & documented?SupportKey Word Analysis Criteria Are employees trained to perform their job functions?LeadershipKey Word Analysis Criteria Is there a quality policy available / displayed / understood?0 Are employees competent to perform their job functions? Does the company have the necessary infrastructure (buildings, equipments, transport,IT.)? Does the company have any plant layouts available? Does the company consider personnel safety within the manufacturing process?OperationKey Word Analysis Criteria Does the company verify,validate,monitor, and / or inspect customer product?

10 Is there any maintenance / preventative maintenance activities evident? Are any manufacturing tooling requirements available & demonstrated? Does the company identify product through process for traceability purposes ( internal )?0 Are the effects of any change (drawings,etc) properly controlled? Are customer requirements such as delivery (packaging) & post delivery (warranty) evident? Does the company have a proper communication system with the customer? Is measurement equipment verified for manufacturing process (ex. Calibrated, GR&R)? Is information available on daily Production such as schedule adherence & discussed?


Related search queries