SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
2 . v. HAWAII TRUMP Syllabus . Invoking his authority under 8 U. S. C. §§1182(f) and 1185(a), he de-termined that certain restrictions were necessary to “prevent the en-
Link to this page:
Documents from same domain
2 CITIZENS UNITED v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMM’N Syllabus and cable television. Concerned about possible civil and criminal penalties for violating §441b, it sought declaratory and injunctive re-
The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the ; United States District Court for the Middle District of North : Carolina for further consideration in light of Gill v.
(Slip Opinion) Cite as: 585 U. S. ____ (2018) 1 Per Curiam NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the …
2 OIL STATES ENERGY SERVICES, LLC v. GREENE’S ENERGY GROUP, LLC Syllabus . 1. Inter partes review does not violate Article III. Pp. 5–17. (a) Under this Court’s precedents, Congress has significant lati-
ment, as applied to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment. The freedoms asserted here are both the freedom of speech and the free exercise of religion.
cite as: 583 u. s. ____ (2017) 1 breyer, j., dissenting supreme court of the united states nos. 16–9448 and 17–5083 quentin marcus truehill 16–9448 v. florida . on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme
No. 19A60 In the Supreme Court of the United States _____ DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL., Applicants, v. SIERRA CLUB, ET AL., Respondents, _____ RESPONDENT’S OPPOSITION TO APPLICATION FOR STAY Sanjay Narayan