Example: bachelor of science

Ten steps to cognitive behavioural supervision

EDUCATION ANDSUPERVISIONThe cognitive Behaviour Therapist, 2012,5, 71 82 steps to cognitive behavioural supervisionP. Kenneth Gordon Department of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UKReceived 3 April 2012; Accepted 26 September 2012; First published online 19 October supervision is recognized as essential for CBT therapists, bothduring training and in subsequent practice, and there has been a rapidly growingdemand for accredited therapists to become supervisors. However, this can be adaunting prospect.

72 P. K. Gordon summarized as a balance of normative, formative and restorative functions (Inskipp & Proctor, 1993). More recently and within the CBT literature, the Newcastle ‘Cake Stand’ model

Tags:

  Formative

Information

Domain:

Source:

Link to this page:

Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:

Other abuse

Transcription of Ten steps to cognitive behavioural supervision

1 EDUCATION ANDSUPERVISIONThe cognitive Behaviour Therapist, 2012,5, 71 82 steps to cognitive behavioural supervisionP. Kenneth Gordon Department of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UKReceived 3 April 2012; Accepted 26 September 2012; First published online 19 October supervision is recognized as essential for CBT therapists, bothduring training and in subsequent practice, and there has been a rapidly growingdemand for accredited therapists to become supervisors. However, this can be adaunting prospect.

2 supervision is a highly complex activity with several overlappingpurposes, in which the supervisor must enact multiple roles and use varied modes ofactivity. Research on the process has been limited, but a consensus on good practice andevidence-based procedures is beginning to emerge. Against this backdrop, a sequenceof steps to be taken within any CBT supervision session is presented here. The structureis applicable across all levels of expertise. The purpose is to give clear and accessibleguidance to supervisors to ensure they adhere to best practice and manage sessions inan efficient, helpful and well-focused words:Clinical supervision , cognitive behavioural therapy, supervision is recognized as essential to the provision of high quality cognitivebehavioural therapy (CBT) services, we are only gradually clarifying the nature of effectivesupervision practice.

3 The research literature on supervision has been slow to develop(Watkins, 1997) and we cannot yet talk of evidence-based practice as confidently as we mightwithin therapy. We rely mainly on recommendations for best practice and emerging modelsof the CBT supervision work stressed basic principles such as the working alliance (Bordin, 1983, see alsoSafran & Muran, 2001) and discussed the parallels between therapy and supervision activities(Liese & Beck, 1997; Newman, 1998). Many authors have also referred to the ways thatsupervision reflects the learning process articulated by Kolb (1984) with its cycle fromconcrete experience, through observation and reflection, to abstract conceptualization, andon to testing of those ideas in new situations.

4 The purpose of supervision has been usefully Address for correspondence: Dr P. K. Gordon, Department of Psychology, University of Southampton, ShackletonBuilding, Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK (email: earlier version of this paper was presented at the Annual Conference of the British Association for Behaviouraland cognitive Psychotherapy, Leeds 2012. British Association for behavioural and cognitive Psychotherapies 201272P. K. Gordonsummarized as a balance of normative, formative and restorative functions (Inskipp & Proctor,1993). More recently and within the CBT literature, the Newcastle Cake Stand model(Armstrong & Freeston, 2006) gives an overview of supervision aims and activities, whileBennett-Levy & Thwaites (2007) suggest six stages through which supervision should for practice have begun to emerge.)

5 Falenderet al.(2004) offered anexpert consensus from US psychologists which describes the competencies required forsupervisors across a range of therapy modalities. Recommendations for best practice inCBT supervision have been summarized by Pretorius (2006). Friedberget al.(2009)discussed ways that supervision could most effectively foster empirically supported treatmentmethods. A more ambitious competence-based supervision framework, based on a literaturereview, was produced by Roth & Pilling (2008) to support the Increasing Access toPsychological Therapy (IAPT) programme (Department of Health, 2007).

6 While coveringgeneric and meta-competencies, the guidelines also began to clarify CBT-specific and colleagues have begun to address the evidence base for supervision via systematicliterature reviews (Milne & James, 2000; Milneet , 2011). While noting thelimitations of some research in terms of its design and strength, they have been able todevelop several recommendations for practice, covering the major areas of supervision :relationship, contracting, learning methods and evaluation (Milne, 2009; Milne & Dunkerley,2010).

7 In summary, we are at a transitional stage where there is a range of guidance available tosupervisors in a conceptual and descriptive form, and an emerging consensus on best practiceand the supervisor competencies required, although the supporting research evidence remainslimited. Training for supervision is gradually becoming more available, and with some earlyindications of its impact (Milneet ). This is important, as the recent expansion of CBTservices has produced a high demand for therapists to undertake present paper stems from several years of experience in delivering supervisor training,both in health service settings and in relation to postgraduate CBT courses within the CBTC entre at the University of Southampton.

8 It became clear that supervisors need a bridge tolink the complexities of guidelines and models of supervision to their moment-by-momentfacilitation of the supervision meeting. The structure described below was developed tospecify the actions and processes to be followed during case supervision , and to offer thisin a clear and accessible format. It is in the form of ten crucial steps to be taken duringCBT supervision . With their focus on process rather than content, these steps can be followedby supervisors of varying experience and at all levels of work with trainees and ten stepsTable 1 summarizes the steps which are proposed as a basis for effective, structured workwithin CBT supervision .

9 Each step is discussed in 1. Clarify the supervision questionLiese & Beck (1997) talk of the need for a specific, negotiated agenda in supervision , just as intherapy. Formulating this as a question rather than simply a subject brings several advantages:Ten steps to supervision73 Table steps for supervisionStep1 Clarify the supervision for a clear question which will promote relevant background it brief and structured, client problem statement, key points of history, formulationand progress to an example of the will usually include listening to a session tape supervisee s current establishes their current competence and gives an indication of the learning zone where supervision should the level or focus of the supervision example, a focus on micro-skills.

10 Or problem conceptualization, or on problematicthoughts and feelings within of active supervision , modelling, behavioural experiment, Socratic if the supervision question has been the supervisee to reflect and consolidate the a client-related action how the learning will be used within the any associated development needs, reading related literature or self-practice ofa CBT feedback on the for any problems in the supervision alliance, or learning points for the gives clarity about the goal of the ensuing discussion, it ensures the work stays on track (withthe implied test of Have we answered the question?)