TEST REPORT EN 61326-1 Electrical equipment for ...

1 Page 1 of 30 REPORT No. TRF EMC SpATEST REPORTEN 61326- 1 electrical equipment for measurement , control and laboratory use. EMCrequirements. - Part 1: General Reference No.. :55790 TRFEMCT ested by (name+signature) .. :Guido Roman Approved by (name+signature).. :Paolo BarbieriDate of issue .. :2005-12-16 Testing :Nemko :Via Trento e Trieste, 116I-20046 Biassono MI (Italy)Testing location/ :Full application of Harmonised standardsPartial application of Harmonised standardsOther standard testing methodsNon-standard testing methodsSINAL accredited test reportTesting location/ address .. :Nemko Spa - Via Trento e Trieste, 116 - I-20046 Biassono MI (Italy)Applicant s :Via F. Rovereto, 9/11 - 20014 S. Ilario di Nerviano (Mi) - ItalyTest specification:Standard.

2 :EN 61326-1 :1997 + A1:1998 + A2:2001 + A3:2003 Test :NemkoNon-standard test :N/ATest REPORT Form No.. :TRF EMC SpATRF Originator .. :Nemko SpaMaster TRF .. :2005-04 Nemko Spa, I-20046 Biassono MI, Italy. All rights publication may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial purposes as long as the Nemko Spa isacknowledged as copyright owner and source of the material. Nemko Spa takes no responsibility for and will notassume liability for damages resulting from the reader's interpretation of the reproduced material due to its placementand item :CONTINUOUS LEVELSWITCHEST rade Mark .. reference .. : .. :8 - 36 VdcThis test REPORT may not be partially reproduced, except with the prior written permission of Nemko SpaPage 2 of 30 REPORT No.

3 TRF EMC SpAEMC -- T E S T R E P O R TTest REPORT No. :55790 TRFEMC 2005-12-16_____Date of issueType / Model: :CONTINUOUS :Via F. Rovereto, 9/11I - 20014 S. Ilario di Nerviano (Mi) - :Via F. Rovereto, 9/11I - 20014 S. Ilario di Nerviano (Mi) - ItalyTest Result according to thestandards on page 4:PositiveThe test REPORT merely corresponds to the test is not permitted to copy extracts of these test result without the written permission of the test 3 of 30 REPORT No. TRF EMC SpAContents1 T E S T S T A N D A R D S 42 S U M M A R Y 53 E Q U I P M E N T U N D E R T E S T SUPPLY SYSTEM DESCRIPTION OF THE equipment UNDER TEST (EUT)

4 LEVEL74 T E S T E N V I R O N M E N T OF THE TEST OF SYMBOLS USED IN THIS TEST OF THE measurement UNCERTAINTY95 T E S T C O N D I T I O N S A N D R E S U L T S 1 DISTURBANCE (ELECTRIC FIELD) , RADIO-FREQUENCY, ELECTROMAGNETIC FAST TRANSIENTS / DISTURBANCES INDUCED BY RADIO-FREQUENCY FREQUENCY MAGNETIC FIELD266 U S E D T E S T E Q U I P M E N T 2 87 P H O T O S 2 9 Page 4 of 30 REPORT No.

5 TRF EMC SpA1 T E S T S T A N D A R D SThe tests were performed according to following standards:EN 61326-1 (1997) + A1 (1998) + A2 (2001) + A3 (2003) Electrical equipment for measurement , control and laboratory use. EMC requirements. - Part 1: 61000-3-2 (2000) + A2 (2005)Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) - Part 3-2: Limits - Limits for harmonic current emissions ( equipment inputcurrent up to and including 16 A per phase)EN 61000-3-3 (1995) + A1 (2001)Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) - Part 3-3: Limits - Limitation of voltage changes, voltage fluctuations and flickerin public low-voltage supply systems, for equipment with rated current <= 16 A per phase and not subject toconditional connectionEN 61000-4-2 (1995) + A1 (1998) + A2 (2001)Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) - Part 4: Testing and measurement techniques - Section 2.

6 Electrostaticdischarge immunity test - Basic EMC 61000-4-3 (2002)+ A1 (2002)Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) - Part 4: Testing and measurement techniques - Section 3: Radiated, radiofrequency electromagnetic field, immunity 61000-4-4 (1995) + A1 (2001) + A2 (2001)Electromagnetic compatibility(EMC) - Part 4: Testing and measurement techniques - Section 4: Electrical fasttransient / burst immunity test - Basic EMC 61000-4-5 (1995)+ A1 (2001)Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) - Part 4: Testing and measurement techniques - Section 5: Surge 61000-4-6 (1996) + A1 (2001)Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) - Part 4: Testing and measurement techniques - Section 6: Conduceddisturbances induced by radio-frequency fields- immunity 61000-4-8 (1993) + A1 (2001)Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) - Part 4: Testing and measurement techniques - Section 8: Power frequencymagnetic field immunity test - Basic EMC 61000-4-11 (2004)Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) - Part 4: Testing and measurement techniques - Section 11: Voltage dips, shortinterruptions and voltage variations immunity 177 : Use of measuring instruments to perform standards 179 : Uncertainty measurement evaluation in EMI 5 of 30 REPORT No.

7 TRF EMC SpA2 S U M M A R YGENERAL REMARKS://FINAL ASSESSMENT:The EMC requirements pertaining to the technical standards and tested operation modes are - not equipment under test - fulfils the EMC requirements cited on page does not fulfil the EMC requirements cited on page of receipt of test sample:15 December 2005 Testing commenced on:15 December 2005 Testing concluded on:16 December 2005 Page 6 of 30 REPORT No. TRF EMC SpA3 E Q U I P M E N T U N D E R T E S supply system utilisedPower supply voltage:o230V/50 Hz / 1fo115V/60Hz / 1fo400V/50 Hz 3 PEo400V/50 Hz 3 NPE 36 V DCo36 V description of the equipment under Test (EuT)The is a continuous of tested samples:1 Serial number:-EuT operation mode:The equipment under test was operated during the measurement under the following conditions:o- Standby - According to standards requirementsEmissions and Immunity tests: The was tested in normal working limits for class B equipment was locations immunity requirements have been configuration:The following interface cables were connected during the measurement : Power/signal supply cable (Shielded cable >30m)Model :Standard power supply cableoModel :oModel.

8 Technical variant:All the EUT type products perform the same function as the head of family product; hardware is the same but theyhave a different floatBrandCommercial name ofproduct codeDifferences by head of of of of of of of of of floatPage 7 of 30 REPORT No. TRF EMC levelThe test results shall be classified in terms of the loss of function or degradation of performance of the equipmentunder test, relative to a performance level defined by its manufacturer or the requestor of the test, or agreedbetween the manufacturer and the purchaser of the related to the performance level: based on the used product standard (table 2 of EN 61326-1 for continuous monitored operationequipment) based on the declaration of the manufacturer, requestor or purchaserDuring the test a value of current was monitored, maximum variation allowed 5% (declared by manufacturer).

9 Criterion A:Definition: normal performance within limits specified by the manufacturer, requestor or purchaser:Criterion B:Definition: temporary loss of function or degradation of performance which ceases after the disturbance ceases, andfrom which the equipment under test recovers its normal performance, without operator intervention:Criterion C:Definition: temporary loss of function or degradation of performance, the correction of which requires operatorintervention:Page 8 of 30 REPORT No. TRF EMC SpA4 T E S T E N V I R O N M E N of the test laboratoryNemko SpaVia Trento e Trieste, 116I-20046 Biassono conditionsDuring the measurement the environmental conditions were within the listed ranges:Temperature:18-27 CHumidity:30-60 %Atmospheric pressure:86-106 of symbols used in this test REPORT - The black square indicates that the listed condition, standard or equipment is applicable for this empty circle indicates that the listed condition, standard or equipment is not applicable for this 9 of 30 REPORT No.

10 TRF EMC of the measurement uncertaintyThe data and results referenced in this document are true and accurate. The reader is cautioned that there may beerrors within the calibration limits of the equipment and facilities. The measurement uncertainty was calculated forall measurements listed in this test REPORT according to CISPR 16 - 4 Specification for radio disturbance andimmunity measuring apparatus and methods Part 4: Uncertainty in EMC Measurements and is documented inthe Nemko Spa Technical Procedure PT 179. Furthermore, component and process variability of devices similar tothat tested may result in additional deviation. The manufacturer has the sole responsibility of continued complianceof the the best measurement capability for Nemko Spa laboratory is reported.