Example: stock market
United States Court of Appeals
On July 19, 2016, WMATA filed its first motion for summary judgment , which the District Court denied. WMATA later filed a supplemental motion for summary judgment to . 5 . raise the defense of contributory negligence as a matter of law, and to raise the argument that Mr. Whiteru was negligent per
Tags:
Information
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Documents from same domain
FORMAT OF BRIEFS
www.cadc.uscourts.govAmicus Curiae Briefs Fed. R. App. P. 29(a)(4)(D) Statement of Authorship and Financial Contributions Amicus Curiae Briefs Fed. R. App. P. 29(a)(4)(E) Summary of Argument All Briefs (Excluding Amicus Curiae's Briefs Fed. R. App. P. 28(a)(7) D.C. Cir. Rule 28(a)(6) Fed. R. App. P. 28.1(c) Standing < In cases involving direct review of ...
United States Court of Appeals
www.cadc.uscourts.govUnited States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Filed: May 20, 2015 No. 13-5368 PRIESTS FOR LIFE, ET AL., APPELLANTS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ET AL., APPELLEES Consolidated with 13-5371, 14-5021 Appeals from the United States District Court
United States Court of Appeals - cadc.uscourts.gov
www.cadc.uscourts.govLater, the United States Sentencing Commission lowered that range and made its amendment retroactive. Smith then moved for a corresponding reduction in his sentence. The district court ruled that a reduced sentence was both legally unavailable and unwarranted. Because, under
United States Court of Appeals
www.cadc.uscourts.govcircumstances,” it provides some directional signals: “[T]he term ‘exceptional circumstances’ does not include a delay that results from a predictable agency workload of requests under this section,
United States Court of Appeals
www.cadc.uscourts.govThe district court held the challenged laws do not exceed the District’s authority under local law because they are usual and reasonable police regulations within the meaning of the 1906 Act. 698 F. Supp. 2d 179, 196–97 (2010). Then, addressing
United States Court of Appeals
www.cadc.uscourts.govDec 28, 2021 · United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 17, 2021 Decided December 28, 2021 No. 20-1190 AT&T SERVICES, INC., PETITIONER v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENTS APPLE INC., ET AL., INTERVENORS Consolidated with 20 …
CIRCUIT RULES of the UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS …
www.cadc.uscourts.govDec 01, 2021 · FEDERAL RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE AND CORRESPONDING CIRCUIT RULES OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Federal Rules Adopted Effective July 1, 1968, As Amended Through December 1, 2021 Circuit Rules Effective January 1, 1994, As Amended Through December 1, 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE I. APPLICABILITY …
United States Court of Appeals
www.cadc.uscourts.govunited states court of appeals for the district of columbia circuit argued november 30, 2021 decided december 9, 2021 no. 21-5254 donald j. trump, in his capacity as the 45th president of the united states, appellant v. bennie g. thompson, in his official capacity as chairman of the united states house select committee to investigate the january 6th attack on
United States Court of Appeals - cadc.uscourts.gov
www.cadc.uscourts.govreliable to support a refund.On June 19, 2020, United petitioned for review of the TSA’s denial. We have jurisdiction of United’s petition pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 46110(a). III. Analysis . United contends that the TSA’s rejection of its refund request was …
Guidance on Redacting Personal Data Identifiers in ...
www.cadc.uscourts.govGuidance on Redacting Personal Data Identifiers in Electronically Filed Documents -5-< Redacting a Scanned File (tiff, jpeg, gif, etc.): This is a little more tricky since you are modifying an "image" or photo of a file and the data which contains that image may not be fully removed or destroyed using common software tools.